| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Ms. JoAnn H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be changed.
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his discharge, he was young and scared and did not know what was happening; that he needed advice and did not get it; and that he had no idea his future would be so affected by his discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 19 August 1953 and enlisted in the Regular Army at Van Nuys, California for a period of 2 years on 31 August 1971. He was then honorably discharged on 23 September 1971 in order to reenlist immediately for 3 years on 24 September 1971.
Following basic combat training at Fort Ord, California, he was assigned to Fort Sill, Oklahoma for advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A, Cannoneer. While still in AIT, the applicant went AWOL (absent without leave) from 14-28 January 1972. Upon his return to military control at Fort Sill, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for AWOL, disobeying a lawful order, and breaking restriction. He was punished by reduction to private/E-1, forfeiture of $100 pay per month for 2 months, and 30 days' restriction and extra duty.
On 2 February 1972, the applicant again went AWOL and remained absent until 3 April 1972 when he returned to military control at Fort Ord. He was assigned to the Fort Ord Personnel Control Facility and court-martial charges were preferred against him for being AWOL. On 10 April 1972, he consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He stated that he acknowledged he was guilty of the charge against him, a charge which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further stated that he understood that he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate and that as a result, he may be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration (VA) and under State and Federal law. He submitted a statement in his own behalf, stating "I want out. I can't stand it. I don't like the people in the Army. I'll split again and never come back. So, save everybody some trouble and let me out."
The applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial was approved on 11 May 1972. On 15 May 1972, he was separated with an Undesirable Discharge. He had 5 months and 6 days of creditable service on his enlistment and 6 months of total creditable service. He also had 76 days of lost time due to AWOL.
The applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade. The ADRB, after considering his case on 18 January 1984, denied his request.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. At the time of the applicant’s separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant was 18 years old when he first enlisted and met all entrance qualification standards, to include age. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
3. The applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. The Board noted that the applicant consulted with legal counsel who thoroughly explained his situation and the effects of a less than fully honorable discharge. Having been so informed, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he admitted guilt to the stipulated offense.
4. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. There is no error or injustice.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JHL __ ___MHM_ __KAH __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001055265 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010918 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19720515 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001593C070205
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 20 September 1973, the applicant was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085051C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s record does not contain his request for discharge for the good of the service and all documents related to his discharge from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608830C070209
The first specification covered the period the applicant was AWOL from Fort Ord, 7 September-18 October 1971 and the second specification was for an AWOL period 21-22 October (1 day) from Fort Leonard Wood. Accordingly, on 19 October 1972 the applicant was discharged while in an AWOL status after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 15 days of active military service and accruing 121 days of time lost. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011943
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. James E....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008621
The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. At that time, he stated if he was not discharged he would go AWOL again.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011124
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 March 1972, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 - for the good of the service in lieu of trial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089894C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was transferred to Fort Ord, California to undergo his basic combat training (BCT). The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068610C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 9 June 1976, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge after determining that he had been properly discharged. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100001C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 12 August 2003.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002366
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge on 22 June 1971 and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.