| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
APPLICANT STATES: That she was the FSM’s beneficiary on his military records for the entire time he was in the Army. They were together for over 30 years. She filed for a divorce in January 1982 but they never entered the separation agreement and they assumed the divorce was voided. She provides several letters from her son and acquaintances attesting to the fact that she and the FSM lived together for years until his death. She states the failure to enroll in the RCSBP was an oversight on his part but by waiting until he was 60 to elect the SBP would have meant more monthly retired pay. The premiums could come from his retirement account.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
He was born on 22 July 1950. His marriage certificate is not available but his Statement of Personal History, DD Form 398, dated 8 June 1970 shows he was married to the applicant at that time. After having had prior active duty, he entered the U. S. Army Reserve in January 1972. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter), is dated 21 April 1997.
The applicant provides no divorce decree or other court documentation to show that the divorce never became final.
The FSM died on 1 November 2000 of acute coronary insufficiency. The death shows the applicant was the informant and that he was married at the time.
Correspondence from AR-PERSCOM to the applicant dated 17 January and 6 February 2001 indicated that the FSM was mailed his SBP packet on 21 April 1997 and he failed to return the Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, within 90 days.
Correspondence from AR-PERSCOM to the applicant’s Senator dated 13 February 2001 indicated that the applicant and the FSM were divorced at the time of his death and the service was not informed by either the FSM or the applicant of any redesignation. It cannot be determined if AR-PERSCOM saw a divorce decree or used information given by the applicant.
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board makes no determination about the applicant’s divorce since she provides neither the divorce decree nor other court documents to show that she and the FSM were not legally divorced.
3. More pertinently, however, the evidence of record shows that the FSM failed to enroll in the RCSBP. As the applicant acknowledges, waiting until the FSM was 60 to elect the SBP would have meant more monthly retired pay. Many reservists make a conscious decision, a gamble that they will reach age 60, not to enroll in the RCSBP for just this reason. Unfortunately, since the FSM never reached age 60 he never became eligible for retired pay so it would not be appropriate to take the RCSBP premiums out of retired pay to which he never became entitled.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __slp___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001055031 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010717 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062786C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) and enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for children only coverage, option C. According to TNARNG records, the FSM would have completed his 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay around 4 March 2001. That all of the Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029
The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012228
The Board indicated that the applicant and the FSM were divorced on 15 August 2000 and that once they were divorced, she was no longer qualified to receive SBP benefits under the spouse option. The evidence of record shows that the applicant and the FSM were remarried on 4 December 1990. The evidence of record also shows the FSM and the applicant were divorced on 15 August 2000 and their divorce decree did not indicate continued coverage under the SBP as a former spouse.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020974
Counsel requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show: * the applicant is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits * the applicant is eligible to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay 2. The divorce decree indicated that the applicant was to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001441
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests reconsideration of her previous request for correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. In their response, DFAS made the following points: * the FSM originally elected SBP coverage for his spouse * upon their Judgment of Divorce, dated 6 February 1997, the applicant lost her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822
The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007305
Despite this, there is no documentation in his record that shows he elected to participate in the RCSBP after receiving his 15-year letter. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provides a means for those who have qualified for Reserve retirement, but who are not yet age 60 [upon which they would be eligible to begin drawing retired pay, upon request, and to participate in the SBP], to provide an annuity to their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015270
He states that he and the former service member (FSM) lived together as husband and wife for 3 years prior to the date of their marriage. By letter, AR-PERSCOM, Transition and Separations Branch notified the applicant that he was not eligible for the FSMs SBP annuity because he and the FSM were not married for one full year before the FSMs date of death. Public records show the applicant and the FSM were married on 26 February 2009.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059331C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 August 1998, the FSM and the applicant divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076772C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for former spouse coverage. On 10 August 1992, he completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. He named the applicant as his spouse and indicated they were...