Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054911C070420
Original file (2001054911C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 30 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001054911


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
                  records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
                  advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was actually presented the medal “on the field of combat” in 1952. He also complains that Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has treated him unfairly. He makes reference to medical files that were believed to replace those lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire in 1973. He submits copies of news releases about those medical files. Although he indicated on the DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) that he did not wish a personal hearing, his attached narrative indicates that he does request a personal appearance hearing before the Board.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum of consideration prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR2000040828) on 19 September 2000.

The applicant’s contentions are new argument that requires Board consideration.

The applicant retired due to length of service in 1976.

A health record research project, commonly referred to as the "SGO Files", involved transposing the hospital admission card data from the periods of World War II and the Korean conflict onto magnetic tape. In 1988 the National Research Council made these tape files available to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). The availability of the information to the NPRC received considerable publicity by the various veterans service organizations. It was widely believed that these tapes would become a valuable substitute for the records lost in the NPRC fire of 1973. It is estimated that the SGO files document 95 percent of all hospitalized battle casualties from World War II and the Korean War.

The only available SGO entries show that the applicant was hospitalized in Korea as a non-battle casualty on 12 August 1952.

Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted) that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.


The regulation provides further guidance for reconsideration requests that are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case. In such cases, the staff of the Board will review the request to determine if substantial relevant evidence has been submitted that shows fraud, mistake in law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or if there exists substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s original decision. If the staff finds such evidence, the case will be resubmitted to the Board. If no such evidence is found, the application will be returned without action.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no available evidence of record that the applicant was treated for a wound sustained while in action against the enemy or as the result of enemy action.

2. The SGO files fail to substantiate entitlement to the Purple Heart.

3. Prior to reaching a determination that it was not in the interest of justice to excuse a failure to timely file, the Board looks at an entire file. The Board considers the statute of limitations only after all other aspects have been considered and it has been concluded that there is no basis to recommend a correction of the records. When the Board determines that an error or injustice exists, it routinely recommends relief in spite of a failure to submit the application within the 3-year time limit. Although the decisional document may not state that the Board considered the merits of the case, the display of the pertinent details of applicant’s service record, the circumstances of the case and the regulations governing the issues tends to show that it did. The Board does not deny applications simply because they were not submitted within 3 years.

4. There is no statutory or regulatory right to a formal hearing. The Board receives over 15,000 applications each year, but normally grants only approximately 20 formal hearings a year. Formal hearings are granted only when it is determined that a case is so complex, or the records so incomplete that only sworn testimony can provide the necessary information.


5. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE
:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___RVO_ __CJP __ __LDS___ DENY APPLICATION



         Carl W. S. Chun

Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001054911
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010830
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058976C070421

    Original file (2001058976C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that a 28 March 1952 letter from the FSM’s division commander substantiates that he was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge. The submitted letter is new evidence that requires Board consideration. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710881A

    Original file (9710881A.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submits copies of service medical record documents and a statement to the effect that the official medical report dated 1 November 1950 erroneously indicates he received burns of the face and hands when attempting to remove a cap from a water tank. He also submits a copy of an SGO record for a World War II soldier. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073921C070403

    Original file (2002073921C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Contrary to the applicant's contentions, the SGO files clearly show that he was hospitalized on three occasions for illnesses and surgical complications, not injuries (wounds). While the applicant served as an infantryman during the Korean War, and was released prior to the expiration of his term of service, neither of these facts establish that he was wounded in combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070728C070402

    Original file (2002070728C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he entered on active duty on 6 June 1949, had 2 years and one month of foreign service, and was awarded the Combat Medical Badge, the Army of Occupation Medal (Japan), the Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the United Nations Service Medal. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010450

    Original file (20090010450 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). While the SGO files indicate the applicant's knee condition was recorded as a "battle casualty," there is no other evidence available to the Board or provided by the applicant which confirms the accuracy of that entry on the SGO files. In this particular case, in the absence of more compelling medical evidence which supports the accuracy of the information in the SGO files concerning the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072634C070403

    Original file (2002072634C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Purple Heart be included in his records. When the Department of the Air Force authorizes the Korean War Service Medal, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign unit award to his DD Form 214. The Board also notes that the applicant’s service in Korea during the Korean Conflict entitles him to receive the Korean War Service Medal; however, the applicant must apply to the Department of the Air Force to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015623

    Original file (20140015623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. Although the unit to which he was assigned in Korea is not known, the SGO file provides sufficient evidence that he was in fact serving in Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 with an effective date of separation of 14 November 1952: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068198C070402

    Original file (2002068198C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Personnel awarded the Korean Service Medal automatically establish eligibility for the United Nations Service Medal. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. The applicant is entitled to award of the National Defense Service Medal and the United Nations Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106042C070208

    Original file (2004106042C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action With Enemy Forces), of the FSM's DD Form 214, shows the entry, "None." Once the Department of the Air Force has authorized the Korean War Service Medal, the applicant may apply to the Army Board For Correction of Military Records to have it added to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079890C070215

    Original file (2002079890C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not include award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action. As a matter of information, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Korean War, the Government of the Republic of Korea issued the Korean War Service Medal to pay tribute to eligible Korean War veterans for their historic endeavors to preserve the freedom of the Republic of Korea and the free world. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the...