Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054805C070420
Original file (2001054805C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 19 July 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001054805

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Mark D. Manning Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Ms. Gail J. Wire Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and that his retired pay be paid to his estate.

APPLICANT STATES: The applicant apparently defers to counsel.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: That the applicant is not requesting to collect monies under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for which the FSM never applied. As executrix of the FSM’s estate, she requests to collect those military retired pay benefits that he would have received from the date of eligibility to the date of his death. Because his military records were not accurate, the FSM decided to correct his military records before making application for his military retired pay benefits. He continued this on and off until his death in December 1999. He earned his military retired pay. His estate and widow should not be barred from collecting said benefits.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He was born on 16 June 1935. After having had prior active duty, he entered the U. S. Army Reserve on 23 April 1960. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 26 June 1980. He turned age 60 on 16 June 1995. He died on 6 December 1999 without ever had applied for retired pay.

There is no evidence of record to show that there was a problem with the FSM’s retirement points or other records or that he ever contacted the Army Reserve Personnel Command about such a problem.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12731(a) states that a person who meets certain eligibility criteria is entitled, upon application, to retired pay.

The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DODFMR), paragraph 300101 states that entitlement to retired pay terminates on the date of the retiree’s death. The DODFMR defines “retired pay” as the gross entitlement for a member based on conditions of the retirement law, pay grade, years of service for basic pay, years of service for percentage multiplier, percentage of disability, if appropriate, and date of retirement.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Retirements and Annuities Branch, Army Reserve Personnel Command. That office noted that the FSM had been provided the necessary forms and instructions for applying for retired pay one year in advance of his 60th birthday yet he never made application for his retired pay.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. She did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The law provides that retired pay is paid, upon application, to the member. Entitlement to retired pay terminates upon the member’s death. The FSM had an opportunity to apply for retired pay and dispute the accuracy of his records afterwards. There is no evidence of record to show that there was an inaccuracy in his records or that he ever contacted the Army Reserve Personnel Command about such a problem and the applicant provides no such evidence. The Board will not consider granting the relief requested without such evidence.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mdm___ __le____ __gjw___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001054805
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010719
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.14
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057995C070420

    Original file (2001057995C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and that he named him, the applicant, as the beneficiary for all retired pay due and as his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary. If so, an application for retired pay would be sent to him. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM applied for retired pay on 1 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022984

    Original file (20120022984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This research confirmed that DFAS did not receive an annuity application from her mother or a written claim for the annuity within 6 years of the FSM's death. As such, and only as a matter of equity, the FSM's records should be corrected to show his widow, the applicant's deceased mother, made a timely request for payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death and her request was received and processed by DFAS shortly after the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008789C070206

    Original file (20050008789C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS stated in the letter that the FSM's account had been corrected to show spouse coverage only, based on full gross retired pay at a monthly cost of $93.60. Therefore, since the evidence clearly shows that the applicant and his mother made timely attempts to file for SBP, it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to recommend that the FSM's records be corrected to show that the FSM's spouse, the applicant’s mother, applied for SBP, (spousal coverage only, based on full gross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009888

    Original file (20100009888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased mother, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she applied for non-regular retired pay effective 17 May 2002 and that her estate be paid her entitlements until the time of her death on 8 April 2009. On 7 October 1999, the FSM was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay (20-year letter) notifying her that she had completed the required years of qualifying Reserve service and was eligible for retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065650C070402

    Original file (2002065650C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was appointed the executor-administrator of his estate. Records at DFAS-CL indicate the FSM continued to pay SBP premiums until his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002897C070206

    Original file (20050002897C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that Section 24 of the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) contains a signature which has been forged. She requests that this signature be removed and replaced with a statement indicating that she did not agree with the decision of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to decline SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000905

    Original file (20110000905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The response from DFAS shows that the following was not on file: * DA Form 4240 * SBP debt * Death certificate * No application from the applicant for SBP benefits 10. The evidence also shows he died on 27 September 1998 and his death was not reported to DFAS in a timely manner and his spouse continued to collect his full retirement pay until it was stopped in August 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020846

    Original file (20130020846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. Her position is that when the law states "only," anything outside of that is an invalid designation to be paid out by law. The FSM designated 25% of the death gratuity to two organizations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020557

    Original file (20110020557.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s request that the record of the FSM be corrected to show she applied for retired pay and that the estate of the FSM be provided all back retired pay due as a result has been carefully considered. Based on the extraordinary equity considerations in this case, even though no direct benefit would accrue to the FSM, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity to amend the original Board recommendation to show the FSM applied for retired pay in a timely manner, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009308

    Original file (20130009308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copes of: * the FSM's DA Form 4240 * death certificate for the FSM and his spouse * birth certificates * FSM's Chronological Record of Military Service (retirement points record) * Eric Roger W-----, the FSM's grandson's, designation of the applicant as General Power of Attorney (POA), signed, witnessed and notarized on 19 April 2013 * Standard Form 1174 (Claim for Unpaid Compensation of Deceased Member of the Uniformed Services), signed by the applicant as executor of...