Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054591C070420
Original file (2001054591C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001054591

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Mr. Thomas F. Baxter Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for his initial period of service and that he receive an award for his service in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR).

APPLICANT STATES: That the service stripes on his uniform must match the Army Good Conduct Medal or the photographers at their photo facility will not take his official photo for the upcoming E-7 promotion board. He states that he provided a copy of his Report of Separation or Discharge, DD Form 214, and his release from the USAR to allow him to reenlist in the Regular Army but no documents were attached.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, except his Delayed Entry Program (DEP) documents, from his initial period of service are not available. The records may be at the Army Reserve Personnel Command but cannot be obtained by the Board at this time. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The applicant enlisted in the DEP on 19 June 1987 and in the Regular Army on 2 September 1988. He apparently was honorably separated on 1 September 1991 and entered the active Reserve at some point. He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 9 March 1995 from the USAR in pay grade E-4.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. It provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is normally 3 years. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. The decision to award an individual a personal decoration and the decision as to which award is appropriate are both subjective decisions made by the commander having award approval authority. No individual is automatically entitled to an award upon departure from an assignment.

Each recommendation for an award of a military decoration must be entered administratively into military channels within 2 years of the act, achievement, or service to be honored. However, Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1130 (formerly known as section 522 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1996) provides that the Service concerned will review a proposal for the award of a decoration that would not otherwise be authorized to be awarded based upon


time limitations previously established by law. A separate Recommendation for Award, DA Form 638, must be submitted for each award. The unit, the period of assignment, and the award being recommended must be clearly identified. A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates and related documents. Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders and fellow comrades who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request. The law also requires that a request for award not previously submitted in a timely fashion will only be considered under this provision if the request has been referred to the Service Secretary from a Member of Congress. The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rests with the requestor. A request for award should be sent, through the appropriate Member of Congress, to: Commander, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, ATTN: TAPC-PDO-PA (Awards Branch), Room 3S67, Hoffman II, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332-0400.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal and there are insufficient records available to enable the Board to make a decision whether the applicant met the criteria for its award. When his initial service records become available, he may request reconsideration.

2. The applicant should inform, or have his servicing personnel service company inform, his photo facility that there is no direct relationship between the Army Good Conduct Medal and the uniform service stripe.

3. No individual is automatically entitled to an award upon departure from an assignment. If the applicant feels he should have been recommended for an award while he was in the active Reserve, he should take the actions provided for in Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1130 as outlined above.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jh____ __tfb___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001054591
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010816
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2. 107.0056
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008082

    Original file (20150008082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * two letters from the applicant's wife to the person who assisted him with this application * WD AGO Form 53-55 * WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) * birth certificate * news article reporting the applicant's capture * witness statement regarding capture dated 13 November 1944 * roster of all with the applicant's last name * two DA Forms 1577 (Authorization...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013187

    Original file (20100013187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 January 1968, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 13E (Field Artillery Operations and Intelligence Assistant). The record does not contain any evidence that the applicant was recommended for award of the Air Medal or the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006666

    Original file (20110006666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). With respect to the BSM, based upon his application, the evidence of record, and accompanying supporting documents he has submitted, it does not appear that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM. In order to request an award under 10 USC 1130, he must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002354C070206

    Original file (20050002354C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. However, the available evidence of record shows he did not complete any qualifying years during his Reserve Component service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001163

    Original file (20090001163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 3 years of total active service, and his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the AGCM. In pertinent part, it provided that a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. The AAM and the AFSM were not authorized awards during the time frame the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072217C070403

    Original file (2002072217C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Service Ribbon (ASR), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and that he be awarded a medal for saving American lives. A separate DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award, must be submitted which clearly identifies the unit, the period of assignment, and the award being recommended.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007432

    Original file (20100007432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Air Medal with clusters and an Air Observer Badge or a Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device. He states he was erroneously/unjustly not awarded an Air Medal with clusters and an Air Observer Badge or a Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device for his duties as a section chief of the Air Photo Interpretation Section of the 2nd Infantry Division. Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060808C070421

    Original file (2001060808C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect sufficient Reserve Component service credit to receive retired pay. For the time that the applicant was appointed an officer in the ARNG, 1 June 1955 through 28 February 1959, only the period of 1 June 1955 through 6 June 1956, is credited with retirement points as 1 year creditable for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010446

    Original file (20140010446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The ARBA letter states that the applicant's MSM was not upgraded because his performance of assigned staff duties was insufficient. Only one decoration will be awarded to an individual for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service. Senator in 2012 for award of the LOM for achievement based on advice from the Awards Branch at HRC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003482

    Original file (20150003482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Reserve Medal is awarded for honorable and satisfactory service as a member of one or more of the Reserve Components for a period of 10 years. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the conditions for award of the Armed Forces Reserve Medal require that a minimum of 50 retirement points be earned for each of the 10 qualifying years and that the qualifying service be completed within 12 consecutive years. This award is awarded for...