Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053793C070420
Original file (2001053793C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 11 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001053793

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Mr. Jose A. Martinez Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and any other awards and decorations he may have earned.

APPLICANT STATES: Since her husband served during the Vietnam War era, he should be entitled to some awards and decorations.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 November 1959, was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of lineman, was promoted to pay grade E-3, and was honorably released from active duty on 9 October 1962.

He reenlisted in the Regular Army as prior service on 24 December 1964.

On 15 June 1965 the FSM’s commander forwarded a recommendation to discharge the FSM for fraudulent entry for concealing how many dependents he had when he reenlisted. In that request his commander stated that the FSM’s
“. . . work is far below average, in fact, unsatisfactory. He has earned a reputation as a malingerer, a malcontent and a habitual complainer. He has no desire to do his job nor to learn how to do his job, either as a soldier or a clerk. In February and March 1965 he proceeded to miss formations, went AWOL for short periods of time, and participated in various petty activities to induce disciplinary action. These premeditated occurrences were self admitted in the hopes that he would be discharged from the Army . . .”

The FSM was afforded, and waived, the rights given a soldier being recommended for discharge by reason of fraudulent entry. His commander’s recommendation was approved by the appropriate authority and the FSM’s enlistment was voided due to fraudulent enlistment and he was issued a General Discharge Certificate on 4 August 1965. The DD Form 214 he was issued, item 24, Statement of Service, Net Service This Period, shows that he was credited with zero days, zero months, and zero years of service. Item 26, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, has “None” entered.

Army Regulation 635-206, then in effect, provided, in pertinent part, that an enlisted member who had concealed an enlistment disqualification would normally be separated. When separation for fraudulent entry was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.

Army Regulation 635-5 states that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for soldiers who have their enlistment voided due to fraudulent entry.

The Department of Defense Pay Manual, paragraph 10103a, lists a period of service which is determined to be fraudulent and is specifically terminated by reason of fraud, not to be creditable.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the NDSM is issued during the Vietnam War era for service performed between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Since the FSM’s reenlistment was voided, he would not be authorized any awards or decorations based solely on the dates he served on his fraudulent reenlistment.

2. However, he was entitled to the NDSM for his first enlistment. The award of the NDSM is administrative and does not require the authority of the Board.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

NOTE: The Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri, will be requested to issue the FSM a DD Form 215 adding the NDSM to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 October 1962.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___mdm _ ___jhl ___ ___jam _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001053793
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011011
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012556

    Original file (20100012556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) was completed by the applicant prior to entering military service. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was separated on 1 September 1965 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, section II, for fraudulent entry by concealing previous civil arrests.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016782

    Original file (20070016782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has provided new evidence that will be considered by the Board. The FSM's military service records show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army on 28 September 1962. There is no evidence of record that shows the FSM served in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006352C070206

    Original file (20050006352C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of his enlistment, the applicant signed a DD Form 4, stating that he had one dependent, his wife. The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued shows in block 24a (Statement Of Service), 0 years, 0 months and 0 days of creditable active military service. Soldiers separated under this chapter maybe awarded an honorable discharge, a general discharge, or a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006071

    Original file (20110006071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant states the FSM served in Thailand from 27 August to 3 December 1962 and when he requested his medals and awards in 2006 he was informed that he was entitled to the VSM; however, it was never added to his record. Army Regulation 600-8-22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006985

    Original file (20090006985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 of the record copy of the FSM's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41. The applicant provided a copy of page 4 of the FSM's DA Form 20 showing the FSM was awarded the PH and the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019560

    Original file (20090019560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement. The FSM’s service record does not show he was recommended for or awarded the Army Achievement Medal. However, the FSM’s service record does not contain any orders or other evidence which shows he was recommended for or awarded the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014142

    Original file (20110014142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and Purple Heart (PH) to her late husband and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 February 1968 to show these awards. The DFC and/or the PH were not included in this authorized list of awards. However, there is no evidence indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070754C070402

    Original file (2002070754C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The FSM’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 15 November 1967 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows the FSM served in Vietnam after 3 July 1965.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008011

    Original file (20120008011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the DFC or PH in the available records. The available records are void of any documents or orders showing the FSM was ever recommended for or awarded the DFC or awarded the PH during his active duty service. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the FSM was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003685

    Original file (20140003685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his social security number (SSN) as "3XX-4X-2XXX" instead of "2XX-3X-9XXX" and that he served in Vietnam. His military records contain the following: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 23 February 1962, which does not list his SSN * DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data),...