Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053485C070420
Original file (2001053485C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 02 AUGUST 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001053485

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Gale J. Thomas Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Mr. John P. Infante Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her spouse, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received a disability separation.

APPLICANT STATES: That her spouse was injured while on active duty in Korea, resulting in permanent damage to his spine and lungs.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The service member's military records were partially destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. There are no medical records in his available records.

Surviving documents show that the FSM initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 March 1944 and reenlisted continuously up to date of his final reenlistment on 3 November 1951. The applicant served in Korea from September 1950 to January 1951, and from May 1952 to September 1953.

On 31 October 1957, the FSM failed to attain a passing score on a battery of aptitude tests used to determine eligibility for enlistment or reenlistment, and as such he was denied reenlistment.

On 7 November 1957, the FSM was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, for expiration term of service. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he had 13 years, 8 months and 6 days of creditable service.

In April 1961, a reenlistment waiver submitted by the FSM in November 1957 was approved and he was afforded the opportunity to reenlist. However, he elected not to apply for reenlistment, and requested disability compensation.

In September 1963 this Board denied the FSM's request for a disability separation. In the processing of his case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Surgeon General's Office which stated that the FSM had sustained a severe injury (fracture of spine T3-4-5) in December 1950, from which he made an excellent recovery, and that at the time of his separation, over six years later, no residuals of his injury warranted a finding of unfitness for continued military service. In January 1965, a reconsideration of the FSM's case by this Board was denied.

Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.

Army Regulation 40-501, at paragraph 3-3a, provided, in pertinent part, that performance of duty despite an impairment would be considered presumptive evidence of physical fitness.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence to show that there was an error or injustice in this case.

2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.

3. The evidence of record indicates the FSM did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing. Therefore, there is no basis for physical disability retirement or separation.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RJW__ __BJE___ __JPI ___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001053485
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010802
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015986

    Original file (20070015986.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM served in post-war Japan between 3 September 1945 and 27 April 1952 and is entitled to award of the Army of Occupation Medal (Japan); c. The FSM served with the 7th Infantry Division as a Military Policeman from on/about 4 September 1950 to on/about 19 February 1952 and is entitled to award of the Korean Service Medal (with appropriate campaign stars), United Nations Service Medal, two Meritorious Unit Citations, and two Republic of Korea (ROK) Presidential Unit Citations; and d. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090817C070212

    Original file (2003090817C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. However, the applicant's records had not been destroyed at that time and the proceedings of his case indicate the applicant's award of the KSM and the fact that his records indicate his March 1951 wounds. The available evidence of record clearly establishes that the applicant was wounded in combat in Korea on 1 March 1951, that he was treated for those wounds and that the treatment was made a matter of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017127C070206

    Original file (20050017127C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the former service member (FSM) was wounded in Korea and received the Purple Heart. His military records, including his DD Form 214, properly document his wounds, medical retirement, and award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Good Conduct Medal for the period from 26 February 1951 through 31 May 1952; and b. by showing that in addition to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006870

    Original file (20090006870.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-10, states, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954, both dates inclusive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the FSM’s DD Form 214 to add the United Nations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011803C071108

    Original file (20060011803C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the: a. Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 15 May 1953; b.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020468

    Original file (20090020468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to award the FSM the PH at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066635C070402

    Original file (2002066635C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter). Based upon the listed causes of his death, it appears his death may have been related to his radical prostatectomy surgery. That the applicant be paid the RCSBP annuity retroactive to 17 November 2001, the date of the FSM’s death, as a result of the above corrections.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089802C070403

    Original file (2003089802C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that during the Korean Conflict he was captured on 29 April 1951 by Chinese forces and was held captive as a prisoner of war (POW) until he was repatriated on 5 August 1953. Although the evidence of record does show that the applicant was medically retired subsequent to his repatriation, the evidence of record describing his disabilities does not rise to the level to qualify for award of the Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012730C071029

    Original file (20060012730C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no indication, however, that any “physical incapacity” requiring reassignment from an infantry unit would have been related to “placing a bandage on the nose or area of the face” of the FSM. There is no indication that the “physical incapacity” was the result of being wounded in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077309C070215

    Original file (2002077309C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    12) A 15 July 2002 letter from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denying reconsideration of the applicant's request to correct his records to promote him to the rank of first sergeant, pay grade E-8, or to chief warrant officer four (CW4). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The medical board records on 22 October 1952, show that the applicant was a SGT.