Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052507C070420
Original file (2001052507C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 10 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001052507

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Lee Cates Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Sherri V. Ward Chairperson
Mr. George D. Paxson Member
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That award of the Purple Heart be shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 21 September 1966. He provides a copy of a Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision which indicates service connection for shrapnel wound, left leg.

APPLICANT STATES: That the Purple Heart is not shown on his DD Form 214.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 27 September 1963, he enlisted in the Regular Army.

During the period 19 December 1965 to 21 September 1966, he served in the 1st Cavalry Division in Vietnam.

On 21 September 1966, a separation physical examination cleared the applicant for separation and did not indicate any wounds.

On 21 September 1966, he was honorably separated under Army Regulation 635-200, based on being an overseas returnee. His separation document indicates he had 2 years, 11 months and 25 days of creditable service.

His Enlisted Qualification Record shows no listing in item 40, Wounds.

There is no evidence of record showing that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and the said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individuals concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, which shows that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action; therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

2. The VA Rating Decision, in this case, does not justify award of the Purple Heart.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_jea____ _svw____ _gdp____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001052507
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010410
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083730C070212

    Original file (2003083730C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action; therefore, there is no basis for the Board to award him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002370

    Original file (20120002370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the Purple. 10. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001981

    Original file (20090001981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA's Compensation and Pension Exam Hospital Summary shows that on 26 March 1969, the applicant was admitted with a chief complaint of pain at left ankle area where he had an old gunshot wound. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. There are no medical records available which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087054C070212

    Original file (2003087054C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with 1 bronze service star, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066055C070421

    Original file (2001066055C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, there is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017879

    Original file (20110017879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. The VA letter he provides states that he was awarded service-connected disability compensation for a scar to the left chest; however, this document does not prove he suffered a combat injury as a result of hostile action or that he required or received treatment for it. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and sincerity, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012737

    Original file (20080012737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a two-page self authored letter; two eyewitness statements; a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); discharge orders; a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 26 November 1967; a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 November 1973; two physician's statements; a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) report; and a Department of Veterans Affairs service connected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007900

    Original file (20090007900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017096C071029

    Original file (20060017096C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) and a Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records). There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030265

    Original file (20100030265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not show and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he received a wound/injury as a result of hostile action or that he was treated by medical personnel for a wound. In the absence of documentary evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action and treated for a wound, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart. Nevertheless, this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in...