Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052236C070420
Original file (2001052236C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 17 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001052236


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John H. Kern Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he served in both an enlisted and warrant officer status with the Army National Guard (ARNG) and after his discharge from the ARNG and transfer to the USAR he was appointed a captain (CPT) in the Medical Corps (MC). He claims he now has found out that he was discharged from the USAR into a civilian status and was not transferred to the Retired Reserve and wishes that this be corrected. He indicates that he has over
20 years of service for non-regular retirement and received his letter of notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20 Year Letter) in 1987 and should be appropriately transferred to the Retired Reserve.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 21 August 1987, he was issued a 20 Year Letter, which certified that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60.

5. On 31 March 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard (ARNG) and transferred to the USAR Control Group Reinforcement, St Louis, Missouri. At the time of his discharge from the ARNG, the applicant held the rank and pay grade of chief warrant officer four/W-4
(CW4/W-4) and had completed a total of 27 years, 9 months, and 16 days of service for pay.

6. On 12 October 1992, the applicant accepted a USAR appointment and commission as a CPT in the MC and remained assigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), as codified in Orders Number C-10-236833, dated
13 October 1992, issued by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), St. Louis, Missouri.

7. On 3 July 1995, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR via Orders Number D-07-554051, issued by the USAR Personnel Center (ARPERSCEN). At the time of his discharge he held the rank and pay grade of CPT/0-3.

8. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for the separation of USAR officers. Chapter 4 contains criteria for discharge and paragraph 4-4 provides guidance and the reasons that mandate the removal of a member of the USAR from an active status. It states in pertinent part, that members of the USAR will be removed from an active status for any of 18 listed reasons. It also indicates that removal will be by discharge; however, it does provide the option for eligible members to apply for transfer to the Retired Reserve in lieu of discharge.
CONCLUSIONS:

1. The record provides no specific reason for the applicant’s discharge from the USAR. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board presumes that his honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with applicable law and regulation at the time.

2. However, given the applicant’s contentions, the Board also finds it reasonable to conclude that if he had been properly advised of the regulatory option to request transfer to the Retired Reserve, in lieu of discharge, he would have likely elected that option. This presumption would be true regardless of the reason for his discharge and the Board finds no apparent reason why he would not have chosen that option had he been given the opportunity at the time.

3. If the applicant’s USAR discharge was based on something other than medical unfitness, his electing transfer to the Retired Reserve would likely subject him to recall while only providing him benefits to which he is already entitled based on his years of qualifying service for retirement. Therefore, the Board finds it reasonable, as a matter of equity, to provide the requested relief.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 3 July 1995 discharge from the USAR of the individual concerned; and by showing that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective that same date.

BOARD VOTE:

___mm __ ___jhk __ ___mvt__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____John H. Kern______
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001052236
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2001/04/17
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1995/07/03
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 135-100
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 37 106.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007921

    Original file (20070007921.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his US Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve 2. Review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) did not provide any documentation (normally stated in the context of the 20-year letter) that covered the requirement of law to earn 50 or more retirement points by each retirement year ending date (RYE). The applicant contends that his 21 July 1995 discharge orders should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080749C070215

    Original file (2002080749C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 April 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, 2 years after his removal was required by law. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. The applicant was separated from active duty on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003200C071029

    Original file (20070003200C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 31 August 1992 shows he was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) by reason of resignation from the ARNG. The applicant’s request to resign from the ARNG is not available; therefore it cannot be determined if there is a Government error or injustice in this case. However, the additional instructions in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081455C070215

    Original file (2002081455C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her discharge be revoked and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In support of her application, she submits copies of her: Election of Options Form; two follow-up requests dated 11 December 1997 and 14 June 2002; response memorandum from the 90 th Regional Support Team (RST), dated 25 July 2002; Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 21 February 1991; Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020317

    Original file (20090020317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was appointed as a 1LT, Chaplain Corps, with a DOR of 25 August 1994. Once he is appointed in the USAR in the correct grade, USAHRC officials should determine the earliest dates he would have qualified for consideration for promotion to MAJ and LTC and, if necessary, have his records be considered for promotion by a special selection board to MAJ and LTC, under the appropriate year(s) criteria, as soon as he became eligible for such promotions based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007799C071029

    Original file (20070007799C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a 7 August 2006 letter from HRC-STL to his Congressman, which indicated the applicant had been identified to, but removed from, the 2000 CPT, Army Promotion List, Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) due to his time spent in the Inactive Army National Guard as of 1 February 2000. Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance, chapter 13, states that a commissioned officer who is notified of a two-time nonselect for promotion, and is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001732

    Original file (20080001732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in his new application, that an officer selected for promotion must: (1) be promoted; (2) transferred to the IRR and be promoted; or (3) retired and promoted per AR 135-155, paragraph 4-18(b). Orders, dated 18 October 1994, retired the applicant from active service effective 31 January 1995 under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, section 3911 and placed him on the Retired List the following day in the rank and grade of LTC, O-5 with 22 years and 8 days of AFS. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067767C070402

    Original file (2002067767C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, that education requirements for promotion eligibility for MAJ are a bachelor degree and completion of an officer advanced course prior to the convening date of the promotion board. It does appear that the records reviewed by the promotion board did not correctly show this information.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017511

    Original file (20130017511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she served on active duty as well as the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the USAR; she was denied promotion to LTC * her promotion packet was pulled due to the erroneous belief that she did not have enough retirement points/qualifying years for promotion * she was slotted in an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) slot and worked for Army Broadcasting from 1 July 1995 to 1 March 2003 * the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) erroneously listed her in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019739

    Original file (20130019739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he served continuously as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entitlement to adjustment of his pay and allowances at the pay grade O-4 rate. If selected, the Board further recommended correction of his records to show: a. he was promoted to MAJ on his date of eligibility provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion; b. his transfer to the Retired Reserve for...