| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunber | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was young and foolish and made mistakes. In support of his application, he provides: a copy of his DD Form 794A (UOTHC) Discharge Certificate; a copy of a 19 September 1978 letter of debarment; a copy of Orders #262-110 (with 1st Indorsement), dated 19 September 1978, assigning him to the Separation Transfer Point; two copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 19 September 1978; a copy of his DA Form 2139-1, Military Pay Voucher, dated 20 September 1978; a copy of DA Form 664, Service Member's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation from the Veterans Administration; a copy of DA Form 1811, Physical Data and Aptitude Test Scores upon Release from Active Duty; a copy of DA Form 137, Installation Clearance Record, dated 19 September 1978; and four letters of support from friends.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 7 September 1959 and enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 9 February 1977. On 26 July 1977, he was discharged from the USAR; he enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 27 July 1977.
The applicant underwent One-Station Unit Training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma from 2 August 1977 through 20 October 1977. He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B10, Cannon Crewman, and assigned to B Battery, 3rd Battalion/21st Field Artillery, Fort Polk, Louisiana on 2 November 1977.
On 23 June 1978, the applicant departed his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status. He remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Sill on 17 August 1978, at which time he was returned to military control and assigned to the Personnel Control Facility at Fort Sill.
On 25 August 1978, the applicant was charged with AWOL (780623-780817). On the same date, he consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense. Further, he stated that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant submitted a statement on his own behalf in which he claimed that he was disillusioned with the Army -- he didn't like being where he did not want to be, and when he said that he wouldn't do something, he meant it, but in the Army such a refusal only got him in trouble. The unit commander and intermediate commander recommended approval of the discharge UOTHC. On 12 September 1978, the separation authority approved the discharge with a UOTHC discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.
On 19 September 1978, the applicant was discharged with a UOTHC discharge, under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time of discharge, the applicant had 1 year of creditable service on his enlistment and 55 days of lost time.
There is no evidence that applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade within the 15-year statute of limitations imposed by that board.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The Board noted that, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated offense under the UCMJ. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
3. The Board notes that the applicant was born on 7 September 1959 and was almost 19 years old when he entered on active duty and almost 20 years old when he went AWOL. The applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age. No evidence has been presented to show that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_JNS ___ __RTD__ ___DPH__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001052209 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010828 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19780919 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063909C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, an Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) Case Report and Directive, dated 15 February 1985, shows the applicant was charged with the above AWOL offense on 28 June 1983.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003420C070208
Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 9 March 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an UOTHC discharge. On 14 April 1978, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064419C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 22 March 1976, while serving in the pay grade of E-3, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent without leave from 1 March to 2 March 1976. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017096
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 28 November 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed he receive a UOTHC discharge. The applicant's request includes a DD Form 293 which shows he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009049
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 24 March 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a UOTHC discharge. Although an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008407
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant stated to him, in effect, that his absence without leave was a result of severe family problems. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000661C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for review of his discharge under that board's 15- year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085486C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that his discharge was inequitable and granted him relief in the form of an upgrade of his characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for his discharge to Secretarial Authority. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010881C070208
Marla J. N. Troup | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 7 March 1978; therefore, the time for the applicant to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052210C070420
On 18 August 1978, the applicant’s unit commander requested active duty orders under the provision of paragraph 6-3b, Army Regulation (AR) 135-91. Orders Number 199-9, dated 18 October 1978, released the applicant from his USAR assignment and ordered him to involuntary active duty for a period of 19 months and 10 days, effective 5 December 1978. Accordingly, on 28 September 1979, the applicant was discharged from the Army after completing 8 months and 19 days of creditable active service...