| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to an honorable discharge (HD) by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) be affirmed.
3. The applicant states, in effect, the upgrade of his UD to HD approved by the ADRB in 1977 requires affirmation by this Board in order for him to qualify for benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
4. The applicant’s counsel states, in effect, that the applicant served on active duty from 22 July 1970 until 24 August 1971, which included service in Vietnam where he earned the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for achievement. His discharge was characterized as honorable by the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program and at this time affirmation of that upgrade is being requested, in order for the applicant to qualify for VA benefits. Although the records are incomplete, the ADRB upgrade decision appears to have been influenced by the applicant’s awards and decorations, in addition, to impaired ability to serve based on his intellect.
5. The applicant’s military records show that on 22 July 1970 he was inducted into the Army of the United States for two years. He successfully completed basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Polk, Louisiana. Upon completion of AIT he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman) and he was assigned to combat duty in Vietnam for his first permanent duty station.
6. The applicant’s Department of the Army (DA) Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) indicates that the applicant entered the Army with an Armed Forces Qualification Test score of 19 and a general technical aptitude area test (GT) score of 78, which placed him in a aptitude category of IV.
7. On 6 January 1970, the applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to , 198th Infantry Brigade, where he served as both a Rifleman and Machine Gunner until his departure for separation on 21 August 1971.
8. The applicant’s DA Form 20 confirms that during his tenure in Vietnam he was awarded the following combat related individual awards and decorations: the CIB, based on his combat service as an Infantryman; and the BSM, for his meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces. In addition, he earned the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm during his tenure in Vietnam.
9. The separation packet and specific facts and circumstances pertaining the applicant’s discharge processing are not on file. However, there is a properly constituted Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), which was issued to and authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his discharge.
10. The separation document confirms that on 24 August 1971, the applicant was issued an UD after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 3 days of active military service. It also confirms that the authority for his separation was chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and the reason for his discharge was for the good of the service.
11. On 13 June 1977, the ADRB reviewed the applicant’s case under the terms of the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) and unanimously voted to upgrade his discharge to fully honorable. This decision was based on there being no compelling reasons to the contrary and on the applicant’s meritorious achievement during his combat service in Vietnam, as evidenced by his earning the CIB and BSM.
12. A DD Form 2070 (DOD Discharge Review Program-Case Data Sheet) on file, dated 13 June 1977, reveals that the offenses on which the applicant’s discharge was based were solely discreditable acts with military authorities. It further verifies that the offenses were not acts of violence, desertion in or from combat theater, or subject to civilian criminal prosecution.
13. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. An honorable discharge may be authorized for members separating under these provisions, although an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board concurs with the findings and conclusions of the 13 June 1977 SDRP review by the ADRB and affirms its decision to upgrade the applicant’s discharge to fully honorable.
2. After a careful review of the available evidence, and lacking any compelling reasons to the contrary, the Board finds the applicant’s meritorious combat service, as evidenced by his earning the CIB and BSM, mitigates his military related misconduct sufficiently to warrant an upgrade to his discharge.
3. Therefore, while not condoning the applicant’s misconduct, the Board does conclude, because his offenses included only acts of a discreditable nature toward military authorities and he did not commit any crimes against society, that it would be unjust to further deny him entitlement to veterans benefits.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that this Board affirms the 13 June 1977 decision of the ADRB, which corrected the record of the individual concerned to show he received an HD on
24 August 1971, in lieu of the UD of the same date he originally received.
BOARD VOTE:
___cjp __ ____le___ ___js____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_____John N. Slone______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001052201 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/03/29 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/08/24 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 C10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In Lieu of Court-Martial |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067174C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, affirmation and restoration of the general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) granted him by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) based on the criteria of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In addition, notwithstanding the claims of the applicant and his wife, the Board finds no medical evidence of record or independent medical evidence that supports the allegation that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014865
The applicant requests, in effect, that the upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD), under the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) be affirmed. On 13 July 1972, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant's military records and all other available evidence, determined that he had been properly and equitably discharged and it voted to deny his request for a change to the characterization of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004963
The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN for 4 months between June and September 1969. On 24 February 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) voted to upgrade the applicant's discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD), under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) and Presidential Proclamation 4313. Notwithstanding the initial upgrade of his discharge under the SDRP based on his service in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011833
The SDRP stipulated that all former service members who received UDs (the equivalent now being a discharge under other than honorable conditions) or general discharges during the period 4 August 1964 through 28 March 1973 were eligible for review under the SDRP. The SDRP also provided secondary criteria that allowed the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) to upgrade a discharge if the board believed such upgrade was appropriate based on all the circumstances of a particular case, and on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017780
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) which was upgraded to a general discharge (GD), under the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP), be upgraded to honorable. A memorandum, dated 21 October 1971, Subject: Elimination Proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, shows that a board of officers was directed to investigate his case to determine if he should be discharged from the service. He applied to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016876
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 15 July 1977, the ADRB reviewed the applicant's case under the criteria of the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) and voted to upgrade his undesirable discharge (UD) to a GD based his RVN service and the fact he earned a decoration other than a service medal. In addition, notwithstanding the initial 1977 upgrade of his discharge under the SDRP based on his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002705C070206
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge under the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) on 6 April 1977. The program mandated upgrade of administrative discharges if the applicant met one of seven specified criteria, to include various aspects of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to support his allegations or to show that he was diagnosed with PTSD while on AD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027142
The applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). On 30 August 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he receive a UD. Notwithstanding the initial upgrade of his discharge under the SDRP based on his service in the RVN, it is clear the 1978 determination of the ADRB not to affirm this upgrade action under the uniform discharge review standards established in DOD Directive 1332-28 was the correct action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015414
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. However, the applicant's records contain a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 23 April 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service with a character of service of under conditions other than honorable and issued an Undesirable Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024434
Charges were preferred against the applicant at Fort Riley on 17 March 1971 for being AWOL from 9 October 1969 to 18 September 1970 and 20 October 1970 to 25 February 1971. On 27 June 1977 the applicants discharge was reviewed by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) under the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) which voted to upgrade his undesirable discharge to a general discharge based on his previously-issued honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a...