Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052150C070420
Original file (2001052150C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 15 March 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001052150


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ernest M. Willcher Chairperson
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member
Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his discharge from the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be voided.

3. The applicant states that he unintentionally resigned from the IRR by signing an Army Reserve Status and Address Verification Form (ARPC Form 3725-E, November 1999). Both the November 1999 version and the November 1996 version of this form had two possible items for signature – one to verify that the information on the form was correct and one if the officer requested resignation. However, the earlier version of the form did not require a signature if all the information on the form was correct; the new version requires the form to be signed even if all the information is correct. He inadvertently signed in the wrong item. The item requesting resignation is right underneath the item verifying all the information is correct. He received discharge orders dated 21 November 2000. He talked to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) immediately and told them they made a mistake. They initially voided his discharge orders but published discharge orders again on 6 December 2000 and informed him his only recourse was to submit an application to the Board. He was informed that several other officers had made the same mistake and that the problem was serious enough that the form was being redesigned after less than a year of use.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty as a commissioned officer on 30 April 1985. On 1 April 1996, he was released from active duty under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program. He would receive an annual VSI payment of $10,924.75 for 22 years contingent upon his serving in the Ready Reserve for that entire time.

5. The instructions for completing the November 1996 version of the ARPC Form 3725-E required the individual to simply tear off an attached post card and return it to AR-PERSCOM if all the information on the form was still current. A signature certifying that the information on the form was true and correct was required only if the individual changed some of the information.

6. The instructions for completing the November 1999 version of the ARPC Form 3725-E requires the individual to certify the information on it by signing the form even if the information is current. Immediately below the signature block where the individual certifies the information is correct is a signature block, in Part D, where an individual could sign if he requested resignation. The instructions for completing Part D state it is self-explanatory. Part D states only “As an officer who has completed my 8 years statutory obligation, I hereby tender my resignation.”


7. The applicant signed the ARPC Form 3725-E on 10 September 2000. He erroneously signed in the block requesting resignation. Orders D-11-061439, AR-PERSCOM dated 21 November 2000 discharged the applicant from the USAR based upon his signature on the ARPC Form 3725-E. Orders D-11-061439R, AR-PERSCOM dated 4 December 2000 voided those orders. Orders D-12-064503, AR-PERSCOM dated 6 December 2000 discharged him again effective 6 December 2000.

8. Army Regulation 135-175 provides policy, criteria, and procedures for the separation of officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the USAR except for officers serving on active duty or active duty for training exceeding 90 days. Paragraph 6-3 states that resignations will be prepared in accordance with the appropriate format prescribed in figures 6-1 through 6-5 and will include the officer’s present assignment and attachment, if any; the reason(s) for submission of the resignation; and documentary evidence, when appropriate, to substantiate given reason(s) for submission of the resignation. Resignations will be submitted through appropriate military channels to the commander authorized to take final action thereon.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board concludes that there was a Government error in this case. The November 1999 version of the ARPC Form 3725-R is confusing. The section wherein an officer may request resignation clearly does not meet the regulatory requirements for submitting such a request. The regulatory format is not used and no reason is required to be given.

2. The applicant’s discharge will work a financial hardship on him as he would be forfeiting 17 more years of annual VSI payments.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant signed the ARPC Form 3725-R on 10 September 2000 in the item certifying that the information provided on the form is true and correct and that he did not sign in Part D.


2. That Orders D-12-064503, AR-PERSCOM dated 6 December 2000 be voided and the applicant be shown to have had continuous service in the IRR from his release from active duty to the present.

BOARD VOTE:

__emw___ __rtd___ __teo___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Ernest M. Willcher
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001052150
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010315
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075338C070403

    Original file (2002075338C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge be revoked, that he be returned to a Ready Reserve status, and that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be reinstated. He was also informed of the requirements in order to continue to receive his VSI payments. The applicant was separated from active duty on 1 August 1994, under the VSI program and was to receive $8,319.03 a year for 18 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059910C070421

    Original file (2001059910C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) as a captain and that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) program benefits be restored. At the same time, the applicant stated that he also received a letter from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informing him that he could request resignation. As a matter of justice and exception to policy, his 9 September 1998 discharge from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061905C070421

    Original file (2001061905C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) and his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be resumed. On 1 August 1993, he was discharged under the Early Release Program – VSI after completing 9 years, 2 months, and 20 days of creditable active service. The applicant can continue to be eligible for the VSI payments only if his USAR discharge action is voided.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014195

    Original file (20100014195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was not discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The orders stated he would be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) within 1 year of the effective date of the order unless he provided an MSO election form requesting to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from active duty in 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062154C070421

    Original file (2001062154C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his voluntary resignation from the IRR (Individual Ready Reserve) be revoked and that he be reinstated in order to continue to draw his annual VSI (Voluntary Separation Incentive) payments. The applicant states that he was honorably discharged on 31 July 1993, under VSI and was transferred to the US Army Reserve (USAR). The applicant’s record confirms that he served honorably for 10 years on active duty and was entitled to the VSI upon his separation on 31 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079849C070215

    Original file (2002079849C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR-PERSCOM informed him the he had been discharged effective 22 June 2001 and would not receive future VSI payments. AR-PERSCOM stated that Public Law and the implementing instructions of the Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, Chapter 35, requires that individuals receiving VSI "must continue to serve in a Reserve Component for the entire period of eligibility for VSI" unless the member's "transfer is required by reason of failure of selection for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017783

    Original file (20080017783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be revoked, that he be returned to a Ready Reserve status, and that his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments be reinstated. On 1 August 1993, the applicant was released from active duty, as a captain, and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) under the VSI program with entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016715

    Original file (20080016715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) record shows that between the date of her release from active duty and 2007, a number of pieces of correspondence, including ARPC Forms 3725-E (Army Reserve Status and Address Verification) and MSO letters were reportedly sent to applicant. The following pertinent information is taken from the iPERMS files: a. this record contains no documentation related specifically to the applicant's election to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066203C070421

    Original file (2001066203C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That his 6-year Reserve enlistment contract was truly unjust and that he was under the impression that he needed to reenlist in order to continue receiving his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments. The applicant’s records failed to show an enlistment contract for the period 22 March 2000 to 5 June 2001. The period of military service for all enlisted soldiers of the Army will be accordance with applicable laws.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067244C070402

    Original file (2002067244C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was erroneously discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and thereby lost his VSI status and annual VSI payments. He was medically disqualified for retention and should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve and continue to receive his VSI payments under the provisions of the VSI program. Under the provisions of VSI, he should be provided VSI payments from 1998 to the present and continue to receive VSI payments.