| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Ms. Sherri V. Ward | Chairperson | |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Member | |
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show she was discharged for medical reasons.
APPLICANT STATES: That the Department of Veterans Affairs rated her 30 percent disabled effective 5 August 1993, based on asthma, right knee and bilateral eye condition and she should have been released from active duty with a medical discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 5 July 1989, she enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Enlistment Program.
On 22 August 1989, she enlisted in the Regular Army.
On 26 February 1990, she fractured her left ankle. She was treated and released to duty.
On 22 March 1993, she was barred from reenlistment based on her repeated failures to pass the Armed Forces Physical Fitness Test.
On 21 June 1993, she voluntarily requested separation under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5, based on her perceived inability to overcome the bar.
On 28 July 1993, the appropriate separation authority approved her request.
On 4 August 1993, she was honorably separated under the above listed regulation, by reason of her request for voluntary discharge based on her perceived inability to overcome the locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Her separation document indicates she had 3 years, 11 months and 12 days of creditable service.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5 indicates, in pertinent part, that soldiers who perceive that they will be unable to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment may request immediate separation.
Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and the said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individuals concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rated 30 percent disabling.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant is not entitled to correction of her records to show she was discharged for medical reasons.
2. Her records clearly show she voluntarily requested discharge based on her perceived inability to overcome the bar to reenlistment, not based on a physical disability.
3. There is nothing in the applicant’s records, which would show she was unable to perform her duties because of a medical condition.
4. An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation from the Army. Operating under its own policies and regulations, the VA, which has neither the authority nor the responsibility for determining medical unfitness for military duty, awards ratings because a medical condition is related to service ("service-connected") and affects the individual's civilian employability. Furthermore, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout their lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform their duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before they can be medically retired or separated.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jea___ _svw____ __gdp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001052080 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010410 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002030
He further states that he had a profile and had the right to be processed under the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and his chain of command denied him that right. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) provides that the mere presence of an impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability. Therefore, based on the available evidence, he was not entitled to or eligible for processing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606461C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve in December 1972, served on active duty from February through November 1973, when she was honorably discharged. He stated, in effect, that there was no evidence of any medical condition which rendered the applicant medically unfit and justified physical disability processing. The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention at the time of her separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011340
The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was separated for medical reasons. The applicant's record is void of medical documentation that indicates she suffered from an unfitting PTSD condition during her active duty service. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a Soldier may be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004855
In her self-authored statement, dated 3 July 2008, the applicant states the following: a. that she should not have been separated under chapter 16-5 of Army Regulation 635-200 based on her service records. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to their military duties because of physical disability. With respect to medical disability retirement, there is no evidence in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506254C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That within a year of his discharge from the Army, he was evaluated at 60 percent by the VA. A review of his entire military records will show that he should have been given a medical retirement after all of his exceptional military service. His physical profile was shown as 111221. The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention at the time of his separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086420C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Medical records, which she submits with her request, show that she was treated for right knee and thigh pain in April 1980, and in May of that year was diagnosed with chondromalacia, a softening of the articular cartilage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017527
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was retired due to a physical disability. There is no evidence in the available military records showing that the applicant's MOS was changed or that he appeared before either an MEBD or a PEB. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered physically unfit for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge, or retirement, may be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070316C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her discharge for completion of her term of required active service be changed to retirement due to physical disability rated at 30 percent with back pay authorized. APPLICANT STATES : She was rated by a formal physical evaluation board (PEB) as disabled due to bipolar disorder rated at 30 percent. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607940C070209
The applicant did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing. The VA has determined that the applicant did not have a bipolar disorder, but PTSD and has rated her 50 percent disabling because of that condition. The VA is not required to determine fitness for duty at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065862C070421
On 19 November 1997 the applicant reported to medical personnel that she experienced migraines one to three times per month and on that particular day (19 November) she had taken medication for her migraine and was requesting that she be assigned to her quarters for the day. The VA's decision to grant the applicant a 50 percent disability rating for her headaches was based on information contained in the applicant's MEB and a 6 August 1998 examination in which the applicant stated that "the...