| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Lee Cates | Analyst |
| Mr. John H. Kern | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he was honorably separated. Since the issuance of his undesirable discharge of 7 August 1953, he has continued to suffer the adverse consequence of the bad discharge both mentally and economically. He indicates that his youth and immaturity affected his ability to serve. He provides a copy of his records and letters of support. Counsel requested his discharge be upgraded based on his deprived background, lack of necessary discipline and education to successfully serve in the military; he was diagnosed with a personality disorder which diminished his ability to serve; and, his post service activities are free of any criminal activity. He had maintained steady employment over the years and is respected in his community. Counsel opined that this submission, in conjunction with the official Army records, amply advance this former member’s contentions and substantially reflect the probative facts needed for equitable review.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 13 December 1929.
On 12 March 1951, he was inducted into the Army of the United States, at age 21. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 4014 (Automotive Mechanic).
On 13 July 1951, he was convicted by a summary court-martial (SCM) for being absent without leave (AWOL) for the period 11 June to 10 July 1951. His sentence included confinement at hard labor (CHL) for 30 days and a forfeiture of $50.
On 15 November 1951, he was convicted by a special court-martial (SPCM) for being AWOL for the period 1 August to 22 October 1951. His sentence included CHL for 2 months and a forfeiture of $50 pay per month for 6 months.
On 11 February 1952, he was convicted by a SPCM for being AWOL for the period 8 to 30 January 1952. His sentence included CHL for 30 days.
On 1 April 1952, he was convicted by a SCM for being AWOL for the period 19 to 31 March 1952. His sentence included CHL for 30 days.
On 20 June 1952, he was advanced to pay grade E-2.
On 31 October 1952, he was convicted by a SPCM for being AWOL for the period 15 September to 22 October 1952. His sentence included CHL for 3 months and a forfeiture of $34 pay per month for 4 months.
On 4 May 1953, he was convicted by a SPCM for being AWOL for the period 2 February to 23 April 1953. His sentence included CHL for 6 months and a forfeiture of $28 pay per month for 6 months.
On 16 June 1953, a neuropsychiatric examination indicated a diagnosis of character and behavior disorder, emotional instability type, manifested by AWOL’s, disrespect for authority and somatic symptoms. This condition did not warrant separation from the service under medical discharge regulations. The recommendation was that he be considered for separation under Army Regulation 615-368.
On 29 July 1953, a Report of Proceedings of a Board of Officers indicated a finding that the applicant gave evidence of habits and character whch rendered retention in the service undesirable. It also recommended discharge due to unfitness. The appropriate separation authority approved the board action on 4 August 1953.
On 7 August 1953, he was discharged with a characterization of undesirable, in pay grade E-1. His separation document indicates he had 7 months and 28 days of creditable service and 628 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 615-368, in effect at that time set forth the policy and procedures for separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. Unfitness included, in addition to misconduct and repeated petty offenses, habits and traits of character manifested by antisocial or amoral trends. When rehabilitation was deemed unsuccessful, impractical, or inappropriate and separation for unfitness was warranted, discharge was normally under other than honorable conditions and an Undesirable Discharge Certificate was issued.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 7 August 1953, the date he was discharged. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 7 August 1956.
The application is dated 8 January 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_mvt____ _jhk____ _mm___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001051941 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010417 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1.110 | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001307
On 28 June 1953, the FSM's unit recommended a board of officers be convened to determine whether the FSM should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness). The certificate, dated 12 June 1953, issued by the Psychiatry and Neurology Service, USAH, Camp Atterbury, essentially stated: * the FSM's diagnosis was anti-social personality manifested by immaturity, impulsive behavior, lack of adequate standards of behavior, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008071
On 15 July 1954, his immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge. The regulation stated that discharge, if recommended, would be for unfitness,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059810C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 11 January 1954, the applicant’s commander requested that he appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009184
The applicant requests the characterization of service of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be upgraded from an undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. On 14 November 1954, his immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention. On an unknown date in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011763
The board found that the applicant gives evidence of habits and gives evidence of traits of character which rendered retention in the service undesirable and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of unfitness and that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant completed 3 years, 3 months, and 9 days of creditable active service when he was discharged. Although the applicants daughter contends that they have no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012053
The board of officers found that the evidence showed the applicant to have habits which rendered retention in the military undesirable and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of unfitness and that he be given an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 29 April 1954 and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016650
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicants military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 February 1951, for 3 years. However, his records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 23 September 1955 in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, with an undesirable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019683
The FSM's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. On 12 February 2013, the ABCMR considered his petition for a discharge upgrade but found no evidence of error or injustice and denied his request. The regulation stated that discharge, if recommended, would be for unfitness, except that discharge because of unsuitability (under Army Regulation 615-369 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Inaptitude or Unsuitability)), without referral to another board, might be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006705
Also on 12 May 1952, the applicant's immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention due to his habitual AWOL. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The board found him unfit for retention and...