Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051870C070420
Original file (2001051870C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 10 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001051870

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Sherri V. Ward Chairperson
Mr. George D. Paxson Member
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was separated for expiration term of service, not as a result of a bar to reenlistment. He contends that item
26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. He got out of the military because he did not want to reenlist at that time and there was no bar to reenlistment in effect. He is trying to enlist in the USAR and cannot do so because of item 26 which states that he received some type of bar to reenlistment. His reentry (RE) code was amended on 13 August 1993 from
RE-4 to RE-3 and his separation code should have been changed as well. In support of his application, he submits an undated letter of explanation; a letter, dated 7 December 2000, from the Review Boards Agency in St. Louis, Missouri; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); and a copy of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted on 13 March 1984, trained as a combat signaler and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.

On 7 January 1993 a bar to reenlistment was imposed against the applicant for not measuring up to Army standards and apathy.

The applicant was honorably discharged on 6 June 1993 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for expiration term of service. The applicant was issued a RE-4. Subsequently, on 13 August 1993, the applicant’s RE code was amended to show RE-3.

Item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 shows “JBK”. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JBK” is “Completion of Required Active Service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 4.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 4 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active duty for training.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 9, 10, 13, and 14 of Army Regulation 635-200.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant’s contention that there was no bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of his separation, is not valid. Evidence of record shows that a bar to reenlistment was approved on 7 January 1993.

2. The applicant’s contention that item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 is incorrect, is not valid. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for expiration term of service. His separation code shows “JBK” and the reason for discharge based on separation code “JBK” is completion of required active service, not as a result of a bar to reenlistment. Therefore, item 26 (Separation Code) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct as currently constituted.

3. The applicant was properly discharged in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any procedural violation of the applicant’s rights.

4. The separation code and the RE code issued in the applicant’s case are correct and were applied in accordance with the applicable regulations.

5. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the separation code issued to him was in error or unjust.

6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION
: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

SVW____ GDP____ JEA_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001051870
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010410
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19930606
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 Chapter 4
DISCHARGE REASON Expiration term of service
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605876C070209

    Original file (9605876C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as SSG (Staff Sergeant) E-6, vice SGT (Sergeant) E-5, that his date of rank (DOR) show 1 October 1989 [his DOR as SSG], and that the military education portion of his DD Form 214 show that he received training in telecommunications center operations and as a tactical communications systems operation/mechanic. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000994

    Original file (20140000994 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), dated 25 May 1990, shows his company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment. If, however, the Soldier had a local bar to reenlistment and had less than 18 years of service, the Soldier was to be assigned RE code "3." _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000994

    Original file (20140000994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), dated 25 May 1990, shows his company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment. If, however, the Soldier had a local bar to reenlistment and had less than 18 years of service, the Soldier was to be assigned RE code "3." _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001123

    Original file (20110001123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation code JBK is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who were discharged on completion of their enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 2 October 1989 and applicable to the governing regulation, established RE code 3C as the proper reentry code to assign Soldiers separated with a SPD code of JBK, for failure to meet grade and service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006766

    Original file (20090006766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 June 1991, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 4 upon his expiration of his required term of active service. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. While the evidence of record does not show the applicant received a bar to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005360

    Original file (20090005360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the reentry eligibility (RE) code he was assigned upon his discharge from the Army on 17 February 1992 be changed from RE-3 to RE-2. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-3 on 22 August 1979 with prior service in the U.S. Army Reserve. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment based on his substandard performance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017723

    Original file (20140017723.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The table in effect at the time of her discharge shows the SPD code of "JBK" has a corresponding RE code of "3." The evidence of record shows the applicant was flagged on 18 May 2011. The evidence of record shows that the SPD Code "JBK" was the correct SPD code assigned to a Regular Army enlisted Soldier who was involuntarily separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, and who are ineligible or, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016741

    Original file (20080016741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant specifically requests correction of his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code from “RE-1” to “RE-3” and his Separation Designator Code (SPD) from “KBK” to “JBK.” 2. On 5 February 1998, the applicant was honorably discharged in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for completion of required active service with entitlements to full involuntary separation pay. The SPD Code of "JBK" was used when the authority for involuntary discharge is...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011700

    Original file (AR20060011700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), then in effect, provide the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant’s release from active duty, establishes “LBK” as the proper separation code to assign to soldiers who are involuntarily released from active duty and reassigned to complete a military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062114C070421

    Original file (2001062114C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated March 2001, provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army soldiers and Reserve Component soldiers separated for cause. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The Board notes that the applicant was voluntarily separated from service at his normal ETS under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 4 and was issued an SPD code of “JBK” with a...