Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051866C070420
Original file (2001051866C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 3 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001051866

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Thomas F. Baxter Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be voided and he be placed in the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: He had received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) in 1986. When he was relocated from Texas to North Carolina in August 1986, he out-processed from his unit. He was unaware of the difference between “discharge” and “transfer to Retired Reserve.” Supporting evidence is as listed on the continuation to the DD Form 149.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 1 September 1943. After having had prior enlisted service in the U. S. Navy and U. S. Navy Reserve, he entered the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) as a commissioned officer on 1 February 1966. He was promoted to Major on 30 January 1979. His 20-year letter is dated 10 August 1986.

On 17 November 1986, the applicant was notified that he had been considered for promotion but not selected. He was informed that his commander would advise him of separation procedures and any options available to him by separate correspondence. The notification was sent to a North Carolina address.

Orders dated 27 January 1987 discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 3 February 1987. The authorities for separation listed on the orders were Army Regulation 140-10, paragraph 7-4b (removal from an active status due to second time nonselection for promotion) and Army Regulation 135-175, paragraph 4-4a(5)(a) (removal from an active status, with or without the officer’s consent by discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve (if eligible and if requested) due to second time nonselection for promotion).

The applicant’s Chronological Statement of Retirement Points dated 1 September 2000 erroneously credits him with 15 membership points earned after retirement year ending 31 January 1988.

In October 1999, guidance put out by the Under Secretary of Defense provided that former members of the Reserve Components are entitled to certain benefits.

Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to soldiers and former Reserve components soldiers. Each qualified individual is responsible for submitting an application for retired pay (DD Form 108) 6 months prior to age 60 and that those without a current military status may obtain the form from a local Reserve Component unit or by writing AR-PERSCOM.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board does not find it reasonable to believe that a field grade commissioned officer would not know the difference between “discharge” and “transfer to Retired Reserve.” The Board does not find it reasonable to believe that the applicant did not understand that the orders, which quoted two authorities for his separation, were discharging him for twice failing to be selected for promotion. His notification of nonselection for promotion was sent to his address in North Carolina. It indicated he would be apprised of his options by his commander by separate correspondence. If he did not have a commander in North Carolina, it would have been reasonable for him to contact the Army Reserve Personnel Center at that time to obtain information about his options.

3. The Under Secretary’s memorandum and attachment are provided to the applicant so he may utilize those administrative remedies to obtain the documents needed to authorize him the benefits to which he is currently entitled.
He will be entitled to retired pay and its accompanying benefits on 1 September 2003. He is reminded to submit an application for retired pay approximately 6 months prior to that date.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ __tfb___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001051866
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010403
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090860C070212

    Original file (2003090860C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter to her from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command dated 3 April 2003; the FSM's death certificate; the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) with counseling letter; the FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); a North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) letter dated 14 November 1999; the FSM's Retired Reserve certificate dated 12 August 1988; the FSM's Honorable Discharge certificate dated 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004562

    Original file (20070004562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show he transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 15 June 2005. The evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army with 19 years of creditable service for retired pay. Thus, the evidence of record shows that the applicant completed 20 creditable years of service prior to the date he was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087479C070212

    Original file (2003087479C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was reinstated on active duty in 1990; promoted to major in 1991; non-selected for promotion by the Active Component lieutenant colonel promotion board under the fiscal year (FY) 1995 criteria; requested early retirement in 1996; and placed on the Retired List 1 March 1996. He was considered but nonselected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Reserve Component promotion board under the selection criteria for FY 1998, FY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001219C070205

    Original file (20060001219C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the FSM was medically discharged from the Army National Guard (ARNG) with eligibility for early retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected to participate in the RCSBP on 31 May 1998 for spouse coverage, option C, full base amount and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022780

    Original file (20120022780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110018744, on 28 August 2012. 16 May 2000, wherein HRC notified him that he was considered for promotion to CPT by the November 1999 Army RCSB, but he was not selected for promotion and as a result of the second nonselection for promotion he must be discharged no later than 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067767C070402

    Original file (2002067767C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, that education requirements for promotion eligibility for MAJ are a bachelor degree and completion of an officer advanced course prior to the convening date of the promotion board. It does appear that the records reviewed by the promotion board did not correctly show this information.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003944C070208

    Original file (20040003944C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. He requests that the Secretary of the Army convene a special board to determine that he is entitled to be restored to active duty or to an active status in a Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003808C070205

    Original file (20060003808C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, that his service in the IRR (Individual Ready Reserve) be removed from his records in order to rejoin the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG). The regulation also specifies that officers who twice fail to be selected for promotion to the grade of chief warrant officer three will not be considered again for promotion, and will be transferred to the Retired Reserve, if they are eligible and request such transfer, or they will be discharged. The evidence shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080749C070215

    Original file (2002080749C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 April 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, 2 years after his removal was required by law. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. The applicant was separated from active duty on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051422C070420

    Original file (2001051422C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He goes on to state that upon receipt of his 20-Year Letter he was qualified for transfer to the Retired Reserve, that he completed a survivor benefit form, received a yearly printout of his retirement points, which all meant to him that he was retired. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it...