| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Vic Whitney | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 28 May 1970 discharge under conditions other than honorable be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he is a good member of the community and a family man. He submits a letter from his mother and two character reference letters in support of his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted and entered active duty on 25 October 1966. He completed training as a carpenter and was assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina. On 14 June 1967, he was convicted by a special court-martial of 21 days AWOL. The approved sentence included a forfeiture of pay and a one grade reduction to E-1.
The applicant was punished under Article 15, UCMJ on 22 August 1967, for 2 days AWOL. He was again punished under Article 15, UCMJ for 21 days AWOL in January 1968. The punishment included 14 days hard labor and a forfeiture of pay. On 24 May 1968 he was convicted by a summary court-martial of 97 days AWOL. The approved sentence included 21 days confinement. He was again convicted by a summary court-martial of 218 days AWOL on 10 June 1969. The approved sentence included a one grade reduction to E-2 and a forfeiture of pay.
On 6 May 1970 charges were preferred on the applicant for his AWOL from 6 September 1969 to 27 April 1970. After consulting with counsel the applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he acknowledged that he could receive a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge as a result of trial by court-martial. He declined to submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority, a brigadier general, approved the request and directed issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Effective 28 May 1970 the applicant was discharged under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had 1 year, 7 months, and 16 days creditable service and 718 days lost time. His reenlistment (RE) code was RE-4, which is a nonwaivable code for reenlistment.
The statement from the applicant’s mother mentions that he enlisted under another last name to avoid the stigma of his father’s background. He is a married family man now for the past 24 years and he needs to have his discharge upgraded.
The two character reference letters describe the applicant as a law abiding citizen was has provided for his family and is honest and hard working.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
Also noted in the available record are two additional discharges for the applicant. He enlisted again on 25 October 1972 stating that he had no prior period of active duty. He was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 14 February 1975, under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, with 5 months and 17 days creditable service and 672 days lost time.
He enlisted again on 24 October 1978 stating that he had no prior period of active duty. He was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 18 January 1984, under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 14, with 4 months and 8 days creditable service and 1,750 days lost time.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant's request for a discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with counsel, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received.
2. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. He was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf, but he declined to do so. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service
3. While the Board is empathetic, the applicant's personal problems and character reference letters are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__js____ __be____ ___cg___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001051394 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010419 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19700528 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9022464
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 on 6 January 1969 and he served in Vietnam until 18 June 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077317C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On an unknown date, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for the period of AWOL from 4 June 1969-3 June 1970. On 22 June 1970, the separation authority approved separation with a UD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100523C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military personnel records show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1970 for a period of 2 years and was assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina for basic combat training (BCT). Accordingly, on 21 June 1971, the applicant was discharged with a UD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009068
Following a period of honorable active service in the Army of the United States, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 November 1969. On 17 March 1976, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In his request for discharge he indicated: * he was making this request of his own free will and he had not been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002316C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 9 April 1971 the applicant was separated with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Presidential Proclamation 4313, issued on 16 September 1974, provided for the issuance of a clemency discharge to certain former Soldiers who voluntarily entered into and completed an alternate restitution program specifically designed for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069827C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067909C070402
On 23 December 1970, his unit commander preferred court-martial charges against the applicant for being AWOL for the period 28 April to 29 July 1970 and for escaping from lawful confinement on 26 August 1970. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: It was verified that the family conditions remained the same as when he enlisted 3 months earlier,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077142C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. On 5 October 1970 the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008421C070205
Scott Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record or evidence submitted with his application, sufficient mitigating circumstances...