Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051287C070420
Original file (2001051287C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001051287

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John H. Kern Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
        records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
                 advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: The sister, on behalf of the disabled former service member (FSM), requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: She states that new medical evaluations and documentation demonstrate the FSM suffered severe schizophrenia during his service in the Army and it has escalated over the years.

She states that the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the FSM’s request for an upgrade of his discharge based upon no requirement for a medical examination. She further states that a medical examination should have been performed after the FSM’s two periods of AWOL. She states that the FSM is slowly degenerating and the illness is progressively worsening with age and time. She states that the FSM lives in an assisted living program and an upgrade of his discharge would allow him to receive veterans benefits. In support of her application she submits a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty), conservator certificate from the state of Connecticut, a copy of the ADRB decisional document, and associate medical documents pertaining to the FSM’s illness.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The FSM entered the Army on 30 September 1976, for a period of three years. His highest rank attained was private (E-2). He completed basic combat training, advanced individual training, and was subsequently assigned to Fort Stewart, Georgia.

While assigned to Fort Stewart, Georgia the FSM accepted nonjudical punishment (NJP) for disobeying a lawful order and for possessing marihuana.

The FSM went AWOL from 1 June 1977 to 23 June 1977. He went AWOL again on 6 July 1977, and returned to military control on 5 October 1977, at the Personnel Control Facility, Fort Dix, New Jersey.

The FSM was notified on 7 October 1977, of the charges preferred against him for the two periods of AWOL. After consulting with counsel he voluntarily submitted a request to be discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

The request for discharge was approved by the appropriate authority and on
28 October 1977, the FSM was discharged from the Army under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served
9 months and 1 day of total active service and had 119 days of lost time due to AWOL.
The FSM submitted a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board, and it was denied on 17 February 1983.

Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) dated 7 October 1977, that cleared the FSM for separation, did not indicate that the FSM was suffering from any mental health problems.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after court-martial charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Although an honorable, or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The FSM’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.

2. The FSM chose to request an administrative discharge rather than risk the consequences of a court-martial. Although he may now feel that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date.

3. The evidence submitted by the applicant indicates that the FSM now suffers from schizophrenia. The Board determined that the evidence is insufficient to determine that the disabled service member’s diagnosis of schizophrenia was the reason he exhibited acts of misconduct.

4. The FSM’s separation medical examination dated 17 October 1977, that cleared him for separation, did not indicate that the FSM was suffering from any mental health problems. The Board concludes that the FSM was medically fit for the approval authority to accept his request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial.






5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JHK___ __MHM__ __MVT__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001051287
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010417
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 34.09
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709945C070209

    Original file (9709945C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Upon completion of his training he was transferred to Fort Stewart with a report date of 15 August 1976. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709945

    Original file (9709945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. However, they are not supported by the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016282

    Original file (20110016282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 10 March 2003, the discharge authority approved the FSM's request and directed that he be issued an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted pay grade. The applicant requests that the FSM's service be upgraded to honorable or general and that his rank be restored to private first class.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009537

    Original file (20120009537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). On 26 April 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed he be discharged in the lowest enlisted grade under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a UOTHC discharge. Although an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008599

    Original file (20120008599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected by upgrading his undesirable discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions. There is no evidence to show the FSM applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705681C070209

    Original file (9705681C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 February 1980, a Navy physician diagnosed the applicant with “inadequate personality.” On 14 February 1980, the Army sent the applicant for a mental status evaluation. The evaluating physician found no evidence of mental illness; however, because of his history of schizophrenia in Panama the physician referred him to Psychiatry. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705681

    Original file (9705681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 February 1980, the Army sent the applicant for a mental status evaluation. The evaluating physician found no evidence of mental illness; however, because of his history of schizophrenia in Panama the physician referred him to Psychiatry. On 23 April 1980, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009843

    Original file (20060009843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 issued to the FSM on 4 April 1973, the date of his discharge, confirms he was separated UOTHC under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Records show the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on should have been discovered on 4 April 1973, the date of the FSM's discharge, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106978C070208

    Original file (2004106978C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He states that he was given the option of taking a less than honorable discharge or trying to be medically discharged and that due to the fact that he was informed that it would be unlikely that he would be discharged for medical reasons, he opted to take a less than honorable discharge and he was sent home 3 days later. Accordingly, on 6 December 1978, the applicant was discharged, under other than honorable conditions, under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090021C070212

    Original file (2003090021C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the undesirable discharge (UD) her husband, a former service member (FSM), received be upgraded to an honorable discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM’s military records show: