Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 20010007766
Original file (20010007766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007766 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an adjustment of his effective date of promotion and date of rank (DOR) to major (MAJ) from 21 October 2009 to 11 February 2009 and back pay and allowances as a result of this correction.

2.  The applicant states he was selected for promotion to MAJ in July 2008 and he was eligible for promotion upon mobilization to active duty on 11 February 2009 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF); however, his Federal Recognition orders show a promotion date of 21 October 2009. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 255 AR, dated 21 October 2009; and a copy of Permanent Orders 103-008, issued on 13 April 2009, by the U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Fort Bragg, NC; in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant’s military records show he was appointed in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) as a second lieutenant and he executed an oath of office on 2 September 1993.  He served in various staff and command positions, completed several military training courses, and he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 3 September 2002. 



2.  On 10 March 2008, he was considered and selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2008 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) and on 11 June 2008, his name was placed on the approved selection board list published by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command.  

3.  On 11 February 2009, he was ordered to active duty as a member of his unit for a period not to exceed 400 days in support of OIF.

4.  On 19 October 2009, the Joint Force Headquarters, NCARNG, published Orders 292-861 promoting him to MAJ with an effective date and DOR of 19 October 2009.

5.  On 21 October 2009, the NGB published Special Orders 255 AR extending him Federal Recognition for promotion to MAJ effective 21 October 2009. 

6.  On 24 February 2010, an advisory opinion was obtained in the processing of this case.  An official at the NGB recommended partial approval of the applicant's request in that his effective date and DOR to MAJ should be adjusted to reflect the date he reached maximum time in grade (TIG) as a CPT, which is 3 September 2009, and retroactive pay and allowances from 3 September 2009 to 20 October 2009. 

7.  He was provided a copy of this advisory opinion but he did not respond. 

8.  NGB Memorandum Number 04-0025, dated 1 September 2004, Subject: Clarification of the Policy to promote DA (Department of the Army) Select Mobilized Officers at Maximum TIG, states in paragraph 3 that ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of CPT through lieutenant colonel under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), sections 12301, 12302, and 12304, who are on an approved mandatory selection board promotion list who reach their maximum TIG will be promoted to the next higher grade without regard to position vacancy unless that officer has voluntarily delayed or decline promotion.

9.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers, Other Than General Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for the promotion of Reserve and Army National Guard officers.  Chapter 2 (Promotion Eligibility and Qualification Requirements), Table 2-1 (Time in Grade Requirements Commissioned Officers, Other Than Commissioned Warrant Officers), provides, in pertinent part, that the minimum TIG as a CPT for promotion to MAJ is 4 years and the maximum TIG is 7 years. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his effective date and DOR to MAJ should be changed from 21 October 2009 to 11 February 2009. 

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was promoted to CPT on 
3 September 2002.  He was selected for promotion to MAJ by the March 2008 RCSB and his name was added to an approved mandatory selection board for promotion to MAJ on 11 June 2008.  He reached his maximum TIG of 7 years as a CPT on 3 September 2009.  

3.  There is no evidence that he voluntarily delayed or declined promotion. Although he was mobilized to active duty under section 12302 of Title 10, USC, on 11 February 2009, he attained maximum TIG as a CPT on 3 September 2009 while he was on active duty.  Therefore, he is entitled to an adjustment of his effective date and DOR to MAJ from 21 October 2009 to 3 September 2009 and retroactive pay and allowances from 3 September 2009 to 20 October 2009.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending NGB Special Orders Number 255 AR to show his effective date of promotion and DOR as 3 September 2009; and 

	b.  paying him retroactive pay and allowances from 3 September 2009 to 
20 October 2009 as a result of this correction.



2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adjusting his effective date and DOR to 11 February 2009.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007766



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007766



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028253

    Original file (20100028253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 110 AR, dated 27 May 2010 * Mobilization Orders 292-085, dated 19 October 2009 * his Personnel Qualification Record - Officers/Warrant Officers, prepared on 23 November 2009 * a Memorandum for Record, dated 2 October 2010 * NGB Policy Memorandum 04-0025, dated 1 September 2004 * North Carolina Adjutant General letter to his Member of Congress, dated 24 February 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028247

    Original file (20100028247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He was selected for State promotion in the Army National Guard (ARNG) with follow-on Federal recognition (FEDREC) orders, effective 27 May 2010. d. He states that DA promotion policy for officers selected for promotion who are mobilized provides for automatic eligibility for promotion by the date of the mobilization order. The State promoted the applicant to MAJ on 27 May 2010 while he was deployed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021115

    Original file (20100021115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021115 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was transferred from the USAR to the North Carolina ARNG (NCARNG) in the rank of CPT and executed an oath of office on 28 June 2007. This memorandum states that ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of CPT through lieutenant colonel mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code , and who are on an approved mandatory selection board promotion list who reach their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004741

    Original file (20110004741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Discussions and Conclusions portion of his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings noted he had signed a letter requesting a delay in promotion on 19 February 2009 after mobilizing and that there was no evidence showing exactly when he accepted promotion. The NGB recommended the applicant's DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC be corrected to 11 February 2009, the date of his mobilization under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008365

    Original file (20100008365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB stated that according to the memorandum officers mobilized under Title 10 USC who are on an approved mandatory selection board promotion list who reach their maximum time in grade (major - 7 years) will be promoted without regard to the existence of a vacancy unless that officer has voluntarily delayed or declined promotion. A memorandum, dated 1 September 2004, from the Chief of Personnel Policy and Readiness Division, NGB, Subject: Clarification of Policy to Promote DA Select...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012955

    Original file (20100012955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The delay in his promotion to CPT was addressed by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) which granted him relief in an earlier decision by adjusting his DOR as CPT to 1 March 2002. It appears he was deployed at the time (he was on active duty from 21 January 2003 through 7 July 2003) and the Tennessee ARNG made an election on his behalf to delay his promotion until 26 November 2005 with a stipulation that his name would remain on the promotion list for 3 years from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002411

    Original file (20140002411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 June 2008, the Board adjudicated his case and granted him partial relief in that it recommended: * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 2LT to 29 May 1998 * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 1LT to 29 May 2000 * forwarding his records before an SSB for promotion consideration to CPT under the 2004 criteria 13. Nevertheless, the Board corrected his records and adjusted his DOR and effective date of appointment to 2LT as well as promotion to 1LT. He was neither eligible for,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012999

    Original file (20100012999.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An advisory opinion stated that the effective date and DOR should be adjusted to reflect the date the applicant reached the maximum time in grade (TIG) as a captain, which was on 1 December 2008. The available evidence shows the applicant was promoted to captain on 1 December 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending NGB Special Orders Number 262 AR to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017515

    Original file (20120017515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment to her date of rank (DOR) for major (MAJ) from 21 July 2010 to 25 June 2007. The applicant states she was appointed in 2007 and went before an Army Special Selection Board and she was promoted to CPT with a DOR of 26 November 2008. Therefore, her military service records correctly show her DOR of 30 July 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009957

    Original file (20140009957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009957 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of the applicant's military records by granting him a special selection board (SSB) or, in the alternative, changing his date of promotion to major (MAJ) to 10 September 2007. The guidance addressing individuals who are not eligible for transfer to the ING is stated in paragraph 4-3(a) as "officers who...