ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002816C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 NOVEMBER 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002816 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. David Haasenritter | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The separation authority action is not in the applicant's records.
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-044
In support of this allegation, the applicant submitted several entries from his medical record. Therefore, your request for hardship discharge is again disapproved.” 6. In addition, although the Commandant denied the applicant’s request for a hardship discharge the Coast Guard attempted to assist the applicant with his situation by approving his mother as his dependent making him eligible for BAQ and by offering the applicant and his mother housing on Governor’s Island.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020458
The applicant states: a. On 18 June 1981, the applicant was discharged accordingly. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007558
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Records show the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand on 1 October 1981 for overall unsatisfactory performance. He has not provided any evidence to mitigate the actions that he took during his period of active service; therefore, he has not established a basis to justify upgrading his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060585C070421
The regulation states that a member discharged for desertion and absence without leave who has returned to military control will be furnished an honorable, general, or under other than honorable conditions as determined by the convening authority. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included two nonjudicial punishments and 451 days of lost time and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005731
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was honorably discharged on 31 March 1981 in two separate applications. The applicant states: * 25 June 1984 is not the date of his expiration term of service (ETS) * 31 March 1981 is the date of his ETS * he was on leave from 8 December 1979 to 8 January 1980 * he was waiting for his port call and instructions to be mailed to him at his leave address and he never received them 3. On 25 June 1984, the applicant was discharged in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002689C070205
On 20 February 1981, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulations 635- 200, chapter14, for misconduct-conviction by civil court, with an UOTHC discharge. Therefore, after carefully evaluating the evidence submitted by the applicant and the evidence of record in this case, it is determined that the applicant’s discharge processing was conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and that the character of his service is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021748
The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the available record that indicates the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The fact that the applicant experienced some depression associated with family problems is duly noted and was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017959
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant's discharge by reason of misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, with a UOTHC character of service. An honorable or general discharge may be awarded by the separation authority if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, a discharge UOTHC is normally...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020037
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions. On 14 September 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu...