Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711293
Original file (9711293.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
2. The applicant requests that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), had elected “spouse only” coverage upon his eligibility for retirement. He continued to pay premiums, even after their divorce, until his death.

3. The FSM’s military records show he was born on 18 January 1927. He and the applicant married on 25 September 1945. He was initially inducted into the Army on 8 October 1945, also served in the Air Force Reserve, and reentered the U.S. Army Reserve as a warrant officer on 17 November 1964. On 8 August 1979, the FSM elected “spouse, immediate option” coverage under the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP). The FSM was retired on 18 January 1987, upon reaching age 60.

4. On 26 April 1990, the FSM and the applicant divorced.

5. On 24 February 1991, the FSM died.

6. Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

7. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, dated 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP) to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.

8. Public Law 99-145, dated 8 November 1985, permitted retirees to elect SBP coverage for a former spouse under spouse coverage provisions vice insurable interest provisions.

9. The Headquarters, Army Retirement Services Office recommended that the applicant’s request be approved. That office noted that the applicant continued to pay SBP premiums after his divorce. While they found no evidence that he had ever requested that his SBP coverage be changed to “former spouse,” the fact that he did continue to pay the premiums is offered by the applicant and family members as evidence of his intent that his former spouse be covered in SBP. The opinion noted that, based upon lack of evidence that the FSM intended to deny his former spouse the benefit, and considering the nature of his relationship with his former spouse until his death as attested to by statements from the applicant and the FSM’s children, it is reasonable to change the FSM’s SBP election to “former spouse” and pay the applicant an annuity retroactive to his date of death.
CONCLUSIONS :

1. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected “spouse only” SBP coverage upon his eligibility for retirement. After his divorce on 26 April 1990, premiums continued to be deducted from his pay for coverage of his then ex-spouse, thus leading him to believe that her coverage continued.

2. Statements from his two children attest to the FSM’s intent to provide an SBP annuity for his former spouse. Their mother divorced their father only to try to force him to stop drinking; she never had any intention of leaving him. After the divorce, she continued to live with the FSM and take care of him. Both before and after the divorce, their father frequently mentioned that he was giving his survivor’s benefits to their mother.

3. The application is dated 7 March 1996, so the Barring Statute should not be a hindrance to any relief granted.

4. In view of the foregoing, it would be in the interest of justice to correct the records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM applied for “former spouse” coverage on 26 April 1990, the date of the divorce.

2. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s change in coverage retroactive to 24 February 1991, the date of his death.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                         

                          CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711274

    Original file (9711274.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 41, Record of Emergency Date, dated 7 October 1992, shows the FSM as divorced, the two youngest children as residing with their mother. The applicant is listed as the FSM’s spouse. The opinion noted that, based upon lack of evidence that the FSM intended to deny his former spouse the benefit, and considering the nature of his relationship with his former spouse until his death as attested to by statements from the applicant and the FSM’s children, it is reasonable to change the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012861

    Original file (20070012861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012861 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016383C070206

    Original file (20050016383C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rea Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, since the FSM continued to pay SBP spouse premiums after their divorce and he was not married at the time of his death, it appears that it was the FSM's intention to provide the SBP annuity to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011742

    Original file (20130011742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), as follows: * by showing he timely elected to change his election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage on 19 November 1994 * by showing the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) timely processed this change in election * by paying her an SBP annuity as the former spouse retroactive to the date of the FSM's death on 6 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003015

    Original file (20120003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 15 July 2002 letter, the applicant's attorney indicated she mailed documents (e.g., certified copy of the final decree of divorce, letter from the applicant, and agreement to name the applicant former spouse beneficiary under the SBP) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Denver, CO, with a return receipt request (7109 2817 3080 0000 0491). f. the necessary documentation was sent to DFAS in a timely manner along with the agreement between the spouses and a certified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020950

    Original file (20110020950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show: * his marital status be changed from "married" to "divorced" * "former spouse" Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be deemed to her mother as stipulated in their divorce decree 2. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072132C070403

    Original file (2002072132C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 October 1994, the FSM and the applicant divorced for the third time. When the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP in 1988, he was married to the applicant and he elected spouse coverage. He did not tell the Army that he was divorced and he continued to pay spouse premiums until his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008432

    Original file (20100008432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only in 1987 when he was married to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....