| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Thomas D. Howard Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Member | |
| Mr. George D.Paxson | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his general/under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his medical condition was the cause of his behavior and he saw a psychologist at the time of his discharge and is currently being treated for psychological problems.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 17 January 1970 he entered the Regular Army for a period of 4 years at the age of 19. At the time of his enlistment in the Regular Army, he had already served honorably for 8 months and 1 day as an inductee in the Army of the United States. He also had successfully completed basic training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort McClellan, Alabama; he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman); and he had attained the rank of
specialist/E-4.
5. On 27 October 1971 the applicant’s unit commander, based on a recommendation of medical personnel, initiated separation action on the applicant, under the provisions of AR 635-212 for unsuitability. The unit commander recommended that the applicant be given a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD), and cited the recommendation of medical personnel, who indicated the applicant had a condition which represented a basic character and behavior disorder, as the basis for his action. They further commented that the condition was not amenable to hospitalization, treatment in a military setting, disciplinary action, training, or reclassification to another type of duty.
9. The applicant acknowledged that he had been notified by his commanding officer that his discharge was being recommended and completed his election of rights. On this document the applicant waived his right to the following: military counsel; a hearing before a board of officers; and he elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
10. The appropriate authority, in an undated endorsement, approved the applicant’s discharge for unsuitability, under the provisions of AR 635-212
(SPN 264-Character and Behavior Disorder), and directed he be issued a GD. Accordingly, on 29 November 1971 the applicant was discharged after completing 10 months and 7 days of his current enlistment, a total of 1 year.
6 months, and 8 days of active military service, and accruing 5 days of time lost due to AWOL.
11. Department of the Army message # 302221Z, March 1976 changed “character and behavior disorder” to “personality disorder”.
12. AR 635-200, currently in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 provides, in pertinent part, when separation is because of a personality disorder, the service of a soldier separated per this paragraph will be characterized as honorable unless an entry level separation is required under chapter 3, section III. Characterization of service under honorable conditions may be awarded to a soldier who has been convicted of an offense by general court-martial or who has been convicted by more than one special court-martial in the current enlistment, period of obligated service, or any extension thereof.
13. Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 1332.28, dated 11 August 1982, subject: Discharge Review Board Procedures and Standards, establishes uniform policies, procedures, and standards for the review of discharges or dismissals under Title 10, United States Code, section 1553, and applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments. Section 4 of that Directive sets forth the objectives for discharge review. It provides that a discharge shall be deemed proper unless it is determined that a change in policy by the military service of which the applicant was a member, made expressly retroactive to the type of discharge under consideration, requires a change in the discharge. Furthermore, a discharge shall be deemed to be equitable unless there is substantial doubt the applicant would have received the same discharge if relevant current policies and procedures had been available to the applicant at the time the discharge was considered, even though the discharge was determined to have been otherwise equitable and proper at the time of issuance.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s record of service does not meet the criteria for an under honorable conditions discharge by current Army regulations.
2. Had the ADRB reviewed the applicant’s discharge under DOD Directive 1332.28, it is reasonable to presume that his discharge would have been upgraded based on the application of the current regulation for discharges because of a personality disorder.
3. Although DOD Directive 1332.28 provides policy for review of discharges for Discharge Review Boards, it appears appropriate that this Board adopt and apply the standards set forth in this Directive for this particular case.
4. Accordingly, in view of the current standards for discharges issued because of a personality disorder, a discharge under honorable conditions was unduly harsh and unjust. It would now be appropriate to correct the inequity and issue the applicant an Honorable Discharge.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service with an Honorable Discharge Certificate on 29 November 1971.
2. That the Department of the Army issue to the individual concerned an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Regular Army, dated 29 November 1971, in lieu of the discharge under honorable conditions of the same date now held by him.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707034
Although specific medical records are not available the applicant’s unit commander, in his recommendation for the applicant’s discharge, cites the applicant’s character and behavior disorders as the reason for the action. The applicant’s record of service does not meet the criteria for an under honorable conditions discharge by current Army regulations. That the Department of the Army issue to the individual concerned an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707034C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Although specific medical records are not available the applicants unit commander, in his recommendation for the applicants discharge, cites the applicants character and behavior disorders as the reason for the action. The unit commander determined the applicant, after psychiatric and psychological counseling, improved sufficiently to be processed for elimination,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705600
The applicant requests, in effect, that her general/under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). The psychiatric recommendation was that the applicant be separated from the service under the appropriate administrative regulation (AR 635-212 6b); that retention on active duty could be expected to result in continued ineffectiveness and disciplinary infractions and that separation should be accomplished as expeditiously as possible. BOARD VOTE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018018
The applicant requests, in effect, that his general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD); his rank be changed from private first class (PFC)/E-3 to specialist four (SP4)/E-4; and to have his record show he was seriously wounded. On 21 December 1970, the applicants unit commander advised the applicant that he was recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009929
The applicant requests, in effect, that his general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). There is no indication that the applicant ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15 year statute of limitations. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, by reason of unsuitability (character and behavior disorder), as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705600C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The psychiatric recommendation was that the applicant be separated from the service under the appropriate administrative regulation (AR 635-212 6b); that retention on active duty could be expected to result in continued ineffectiveness and disciplinary infractions and that separation should be accomplished as expeditiously as possible. That all of the Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089239C070403
On 27 April 1971, the applicant was given a mental status examination at the Heilbronn Health Clinic. The applicant's chain of command was unanimous in recommending approval of the action and in recommending that the applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 20 May 1971, the appropriate authority, a colonel, approved the applicant's discharge and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service for unsuitability under the provisions of AR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029524
On 29 June 1971, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, by reason of unsuitability, with issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant made a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705680
Accordingly, in view of the current standards for discharges issued because of a personality disorder, a discharge under honorable conditions was unduly harsh and unjust. However, the medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention/separation at the time of his separation. Since the applicant's medical condition was not medically unfitting for retention at the time of his discharge, in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, there was no basis for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006383
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPN codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, by reason of unsuitability (character and behavior disorder). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...