| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth Aucock | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. James M. Alward | Member | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member |
2. In effect, the applicant requests that her military records be corrected to show that she was enlisted in the Army on 18 February 1997 in pay grade E-4.
3. The applicant states that she completed three years of study in the university; however, that has not been acknowledged, because her transcripts from Nigeria were submitted [to this Board] without being evaluated. She has now had these transcripts evaluated.
4. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army on 18 February 1997 in pay grade E-1. She completed training and is currently assigned to a unit at Fort Hood, Texas.
5.
On 20 August 1997 she submitted a similar application to this Board stating that she received the college transcripts from Nigeria in July; however, her request was returned without action because her transcripts from her foreign college had not been evaluated and accredited.
6.
On 10 March 1998 the director of the Foreign Credentials Service of America, a private organization designed to provided timely and accurate assessments of the academic qualifications of persons who have completed their education outside the United States, stated that the applicant had attended the University of Uyo (in Nigeria) from 1991-1996 and received a bachelor of arts (BA) in French. The BA represented five years of full and part-time post-secondary education and is comparable to a bachelor’s degree in the United States.
7.
Army Regualation 601-210 prescribes the eligibility criteria governing the enlistment into the Regular Army. Paragraph 2-20 states in pertinent part that an applicant who has successfully completed a degree producing college program of 4 years duration and the college or university is listed in the Accredited Institutions of Postsecondary Education book, and has been awarded a Bachelor’s degree or higher will be enlisted in pay grade E-4 (Foreign degrees and transcripts must be evaluated).
8. Paragraph 2-20 states, in effect, that an applicant who lacks documentation required for advanced promotion at the time of enlistment may submit supporting documents to her personnel officer within 6 months of enlistment.
9. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from an official in the DA DCSPER, who is also the proponent of Army Regulation 601-210, the governing regulation in this case. That official stated that the applicant did have a four year degree; however, at the time of her enlistment the documentation was not available and she therefore entered the Army in the appropriate grade. He went on to say that the applicant did get the transcripts evaluated, and recommended an exception be granted to the requirement that a soldier must produce the transcripts within 6 months after enlistment in order to receive an advanced promotion.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was eligible to enlist in the Army in pay grade E-4; however, she had not the transcripts at the time of her enlistment. She received those transcripts from the college in Nigeria in July, five months after her enlistment, and requested relief from this Board in August 1997. After her application was returned, she had those transcripts evaluated. It appears to this Board that the applicant made every good effort to obtain the necessary documents in order to have her enlistment grade changed to pay grade E-4. Therefore, an exception to Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-20 is warranted.
2.
The applicant’s record should be changed to show that she enlisted in the Army on 18 February 1997 in pay grade E-4, as an exception to policy.
3.
The applicant should receive all due pay and allowances in pay grade E-4 from the date of her enlistment on 18 February 1997.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned enlisted in the Army on 18 February 1997 in pay grade E-4 and that she receive all pay and allowances due in pay grade E-4 from that date.
BOARD VOTE:
__jhl___ ___jma__ ___sk_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AC |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709590C070209
The applicant states that she completed three years of study in the university; however, that has not been acknowledged, because her transcripts from Nigeria were submitted [to this Board] without being evaluated. He went on to say that the applicant did get the transcripts evaluated, and recommended an exception be granted to the requirement that a soldier must produce the transcripts within 6 months after enlistment in order to receive an advanced promotion. The applicant was eligible to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072590C070403
The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 10 August 2000, and entered the Regular Army in the pay grade of E-3, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, Chapter 2, paragraph 2-20. Finally, the PERSCOM Chief, Retention Management Division, stated that a review of the records in this case revealed that the applicant was awarded a Bachelor’s degree on 29 July 2000, and therefore was eligible for advance promotion upon enlistment; and he recommended that the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102634C070208
Robert Rogers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The opinion stated that, in accordance with paragraph 2-20g, Army Regulation (AR) 601-210, if an applicant has completed a degree-producing college program from an accredited college or university, the enlistment grade would be E-4 (foreign transcripts would be subject to evaluation and accreditation). However, the applicant was considered to be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067494C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he enlisted in the rank and grade of Specialist (SPC), E-4 on 14 March 2001 with all due back pay and an $8,000 enlistment bonus. A Regular Army soldier who lacks documentation required for advance promotion at the time of enlistment may submit supporting documents to his personnel officer within 6 months of his enlistment. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016222
The applicant requests, in effect, that her enlistment contract be corrected to show she enlisted in pay grade E-4 instead of pay grade E-3. She provides: * Self-authored statement * DA Form 1559 (IG Action Request) * University of Hawaii BA certificate with transcript * Email * Excerpts from Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) * USAREC Form 1137 (Future Soldier (FS)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023000
His enlistment contract shows he enlisted as a PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-18 (Enlistment pay grades for personnel without prior service). c. in paragraph 2-18a(16) when an applicant lacks documentation required for advanced promotion under this paragraph at time of enlistment, they may submit supporting documents to the personnel officer within 6 months of enlistment. As a result of the applicant's request to this Board, he has again gone out and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011582C070206
The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show an enlistment grade of specialist four/E-4 with a date of rank of 17 October 2003 and that she be granted back pay, 2. In order to be eligible for entry on active duty as a specialist the applicant needed to provide verification of successful completion of her Bachelor's degree. The HRC's advisory opinion did not take into consideration that an unqualified agency evaluated and accredited the applicant's foreign degree; therefore,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010924
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010924 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that at the time of his enlistment he did not have his academic transcript. While the applicant has submitted a copy of his academic transcript from the University of Lagos, and that transcript has been properly evaluated and determined to be the equivalent of a bachelors degree, there is no evidence that the applicant submitted an original, certified...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075825C070403
His recruiter failed to inform him that if his degree was evaluated and it was determined to be worth 136 credit hours under the United States Educational System, he could enlist in pay grade E-3. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that the applicant failed to inform his recruiter, at the time of enlistment in the Army, that he had 136 college credit hours from the University of Guadalajara.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015726
When discussing his enlistment with his recruiter, he submitted copies of his college diplomas and transcripts to his recruiter who forwarded the documents to the University of Iowa for evaluation. Item 35 (Remarks) of the applicants DD Form 1966/4 (Record of Military Processing), dated 25 July 2008, shows the applicant was authorized an enlistment grade of private (PV2)/E-2 in accordance with paragraph 2-18 of AR 601-210. c. Paragraph 2-7 (Foreign Credentials), applicants completing high...