Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709495C070209
Original file (9709495C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that his Bronze Star Medal with V be upgraded to the Silver Star.  In personal statements he states he was recommended for the Silver Star and the company executive officer deliberately downgraded the recommendation ward to a Bronze Star with V.

3.  The military records show the applicant was inducted on 1 November 1967 and upon completion of basic airborne training he was assigned to Vietnam.  He attained pay grade E5 and after he was wounded with the 503rd Infantry (Airborne) he voluntarily extended, transferred and served with the N Company, 75th Infantry (Ranger), 173rd Airborne Brigade, until his discharge in June 1970.  In addition to the award at issue, the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service, two Air Medals, the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with V and oak leaf cluster and the Combat Infantryman Badge.

4.  In support of his request that the Bronze Star Medal with V Device should be upgraded to a Silver Star, he submits a letter from the Secretary of the 75th Ranger Regiment Association stating that based on their familiarity of awards of valor from the Vietnam era the applicant’s actions were deserving of the Silver Star.  Additionally letters from two former N Company commanders (now a retired lieutenant colonel and a retired colonel) and three former NCO’s who served in the company, all attest to the facts relating to Silver Star recommendations being downgraded. One of the former commanders writes that, in addition to the problem caused by the applicant’s executive officer downgrading award recommendations, as a separate brigade the 173rd Airborne was not authorized to award a Silver Star and that award recommendations sometime got downgraded or not approved because of the difficulty of pushing them through higher headquarters. One NCO, who received a Bronze Star Medal with V for action on the same day, writes that the applicant saved his life and the lives of his team and that the applicant deserved the Silver Star.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy.  The required gallantry (spirited and conspicuous acts of heroism and courage) must have been performed with marked distinction.

7.  The citation for the applicant’ Bronze Star Medal with V reads:

     For heroism in connection with ground operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam.  Sergeant [the applicant] distinguished himself by exceptionally valorous actions while engaged by an enemy force on 5 April 1970 . On this day [the applicant] volunteered to join a reaction force that was going to the aid of Radio Relay 81A who was under attack by a large size enemy force.   As the reaction force was inserted the enemy force retreated only to make another attack at 2000 hours that night.  The enemy crept to within 10 feet of the friendly position and began a small arms, grenade and satchel charge attack.  During a lull in the friendly fire and illumination [the applicant] observed an enemy soldier attempting to throw a hand grenade at a friendly position to his left, he opened fire on the enemy and killed him.  He then observed an enemy soldier attempting to infiltrate the perimeter in front of his position .  He immediately opened fire and killed this enemy.  At this time the position to his left came under renewed attack. [The applicant], leaving another man to cover his position, ran over to reinforce the perimeter.  Two enemy soldiers were attempting to throw hand grenades, but [the applicant] immediately opened fire and threw white phosphorous at them from 15 feet away.  The enemy were immediately killed. Throughout the battle [the applicant] moved through heavy small arms fire and grenades to cover different sectors of the perimeter [The applicant] exceptional heroism against a superior enemy force is in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The accounts of the downgrading of awards by the company executive officer, pressure to reconsider recommendations and failure to follow up amount to a situation that was both arbitrary and capricious.  While the Board is reluctant to substitute its judgment for that of the responsible commanders at the time in an unjust situation such as this it becomes necessary.

2.  The Board considers that the applicant’s actions described in the citation warrant award of the Silver Star.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Silver Star for gallantry in action on 5 April 1970 in lieu of the Bronze Star Medal with V currently held by him for that action.
. 
BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709495

    Original file (9709495.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In personal statements he states he was recommended for the Silver Star and the company executive officer deliberately downgraded the recommendation ward to a Bronze Star with V. 3. One of the former commanders writes that, in addition to the problem caused by the applicant’s executive officer downgrading award recommendations, as a separate brigade the 173rd Airborne was not authorized to award a Silver Star and that award recommendations sometime got downgraded or not approved because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002181

    Original file (20130002181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At first, the enemy could not see them. Like he said, he never saw the enemy. For awards of the Silver Star and below, the Army Decorations Board may disapprove the award recommendation or recommend forwarding the action to the Senior Decorations Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014952

    Original file (20080014952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. Letter, dated 22 May 2008, from the applicant's former platoon leader to the applicant's counsel. In June 2008, the applicant solicited the help of his counsel to assist him in upgrading his Bronze Star Medal. After returning the fire, [PFC Hxxxxxt] moved toward the enemy position and eliminated it with fire from his rifle.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009295

    Original file (20130009295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His reconsideration request to HRC for award of the Silver Star which included the following summary prepared by Colonel (Retired) D____ T. M____ who stated: (1) On 1 March 2011, the HRC Awards and Decorations Branch disapproved a number of awards including the Silver Star for the applicant, the Silver Star for First Sergeant J____ C____, and four awards of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for Soldiers whom the applicant had recommended for those awards. It suggested that he should...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016882

    Original file (20110016882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    [The applicant] was at the perimeter with the rest of my platoon and was fighting viciously against the enemy, as they overwhelmed our platoon defenses. He also stated: * Mr. D and Mr. B were eyewitnesses to the event * he was honored when his unit commander recommended him for award of the Medal of Honor * in 1985, he ran into LTG S, who was astonished to learn his award had been downgraded to a Distinguished Service Cross for what may have been an administrative error 10. The criteria...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019742

    Original file (20080019742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 February 1968, the applicant and four comrades were engaged with enemy soldiers when one of his comrades attempted to throw an un-pinned phosphorous grenade at an enemy position. At that time, the applicant moved across the room, grabbed the live grenade, and rolled toward a hole in the wall placing his body between the grenade and the other four men, and as he attempted to throw it, it detonated burning him critically, but saving the lives of four men. Army Regulation 600-8-22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099980C070208

    Original file (2004099980C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the Military Awards Branch advised the Member of Congress by letter, dated 16 May 1997, that the Army Decorations Board, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, had determined the degree of heroism for award of the Silver Star did not merit approval of award of the Distinguished Service Cross or the Medal of Honor. [Soldier's name omitted] distinguished himself while serving as commanding officer, Company D, on a reconnaissance-in-force mission against enemy forces near...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088483C070403

    Original file (2003088483C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the award of the Silver Star awarded to him for action on 28 January 1945 be upgraded to the Medal of Honor. The citation for this award of the applicant's Silver Star states: Records show that, on 18 May 1999, the applicant’s representative submitted a request to the President of the United States to upgrade the applicant’s Silver Star to the Medal of Honor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008825

    Original file (20080008825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, whose request was submitted to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) by his Member of Congress (MOC), requests in effect, reconsideration for an upgrade of the Bronze Star Medal, with “V” Device, to the Silver Star. The evidence shows the applicant was recommended for award of the Silver Star by his wartime commander on 3 January 1998 for his gallantry in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004355C070208

    Original file (20040004355C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant and another man volunteered to accompany him to the landing zone where they saw to his extraction and then returned to the team's position. Given the facts of the case, the Board has determined that the applicant's actions were not quite at the required degree of gallantry that earned Specialist W___ the Distinguished Service Cross and thus do...