APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge, if possible.
APPLICANT STATES: That he needs an honorable discharge to get a job with the sheriffs department. He acknowledges he deserved an undesirable discharge and that he was irresponsible. Hes made up for his mistakes the best he could through his two sons, both of whom were honor roll students and who have had successful military tours/careers.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicants military records show:
He was born on 21 August 1942. He completed 11 years of formal education. On 7 September 1960 he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).
The applicant accepted non-judicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on seven different occasions for disciplinary infractions such as: sitting down while on guard duty; changing the date of birth on his identification card; traffic violations; leaving post without a pass; drinking alcoholic beverages while a minor, failure to repair and failure to clean his rifle.
The applicant was convicted by one special and two summary courts-martial for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 10 - 12 July 1961 and 15 - 18 July 1961; from 0600 - 1625 hours 9 October 1962; and from 17 - 20 November 1962, respectively. His sentences included forfeitures of pay, reductions to E-1, E-2 and E-1, respectively, and confinement at hard labor for his first and third convictions.
On 12 December 1962, the applicant received a psychiatric evaluation. No psychosis, neurosis, organic brain syndrome or mental deficiency was found. He was found to be able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right and to be mentally capable of understanding and participating in board proceedings.
The applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation.
On 14 December 1962, the applicants commander recommended he be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his right to appear before a board of officers and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 4 January 1963, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant receive an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
On 21 January 1963, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. He had completed 2 years, 2 months and 15 days of creditable active service and had 60 days of lost time (8 days AWOL and 52 days confinement).
Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. The regulation provided for the discharge of individuals by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it had been determined that an individuals military record was characterized by one of more of the following: frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities; sexual perversion; drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit forming narcotic drugs or marijuana; an established pattern for shirking; or an established pattern showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. While the Board is empathetic and admires the success the applicant has had in the raising of his sons, this is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708930
He completed 11 years of formal education. On 14 December 1962, the applicant’s commander recommended he be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. On 21 January 1963, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006283
On 11 December 1962, the applicant's immediate commander recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations) by reason of unfitness and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. After carefully considering all the evidence in his case, the board unanimously found that the applicant was unfit for further military service and recommended that he be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011911
His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he completed 6 months of active service. On 8 July 1963, the applicant's immediate commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness) by reason of unfitness. Multiple self-authored letters describing his military service and the challenges he is currently having with the VA. b. VA rating decision, dated 24 March 2010, that shows the applicant is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056270C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013857
On 7 September 1965, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010498C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040010498 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. It is also noted that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067566C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In this letter, the applicant was informed that he could submit a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board in accordance with Army Regulation 15-180. However, records show the applicant signed a letter during his last duty assignment at Fort Hood, Texas, acknowledging that he could submit a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013857
On 7 September 1965, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000292
The applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1 on 10 July 1964 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with an undesirable discharge. He has provided no evidence to show that he deserved an honorable or a general discharge at that time of separation or now. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006942
On 21 February 1963, the applicants company commander recommended the applicants separation from that military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. On 18 April 1963, the lieutenant colonel serving as Commander, 38th Transportation Battalion (Germany), recommended approval of the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and that the applicant be given an undesirable discharge. The applicants DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States...