| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Ms. Gale Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. Thomas D. Howard, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis W. Barbee | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by upgrading his undesirable discharge. The applicant states that he was punished twice for the same offense.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 19 January 1953, he was inducted into the Army for a period of 2 years.
On 19 May 1953, he was advanced to the pay grade of E-2.
Between 3 August 1953 and 18 June 1954, he was convicted by 4 summary courts-martial, for being absent without leave (AWOL), and 1 special court-martial for wrongfully having an instrument purporting to be a military pass. His punishments included forfeiture, confinement at hard labor, reduction and performance at hard labor.
The applicant had two company punishments for being AWOL for the periods 14-27 July 1953 and 15-28 March 1954. His punishment was 14 days hard labor and restriction.
On 10 June 1954, his commander recommended that he be eliminated under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge. He states that by his actions and instability he has shown himself to be unfit for military service, that his repeated misconduct and disregard for duty clearly indicate he is unable to perform honorable military service.
On 30 June 1954, a final physical and mental evaluation cleared the applicant for separation.
On 15 July 1954, a board of officers convened under Army Regulation 615-368, recommended that the applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge.
On 29 July 1954, the board’s recommendation was approved.
On 31 August 1954, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368. His Report of Separation indicates he had 1 year, 7 months and 13 days of creditable service.
On 29 September 1969, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (AR 15-185, paragraph 8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the ABCMR should commence on the date of final denial by the ADRB. In complying with this decision, the Board has adopted the broader policy of calculating the 3 year time limit from the date of exhaustion in any case where a lower level administrative remedy is utilized. The Board will continue to excuse any failure to timely file when it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 29 September 1969, the date the ADRB finalized their action. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 September 1972.
The application is dated 24 July 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___tdh__ __lls______ __cwb___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708848C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709510
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. In 1962 the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board to grant him a medical discharge stating that he had been under the care of a psychiatrist at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062655C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059810C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 11 January 1954, the applicant’s commander requested that he appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008071
On 15 July 1954, his immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge. The regulation stated that discharge, if recommended, would be for unfitness,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710664
Mr.Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.ChairpersonMs.Karen L. WolfeMemberMr.James P. HuberMember Also present, without vote, were: Mr.Loren G. HarrellDirectorMr.Joseph A. AdrianceAnalyst The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709510C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001542
Should the command deem his performance to be useless to the service the applicant was to be separated from the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness), by reason of unfitness. The applicant was credited with 1 year, 7 months, and 10 days of active military service. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020467
Based on the results of the psychiatric evaluation and his continued failure to adapt to military duty, on 11 February 1956, the applicant's immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character)) to determine the applicant's fitness for retention. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his...