ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708811C070209
The report was changed to show the correct report period; this report the applicant refused to sign. Evidence in the records also shows the applicant received an NCO-ER for the period June 1991 through May 1992 which gave him three success and two needs some improvement ratings, the rater marking his overall potential for promotion as marginal, the senior rater marking his overall performance as poor and his overall potential for promotion as fair. The applicant does not contest...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012601
It instructs the reviewer to place an "X" in the appropriate box indicating either "Concur with Rater and Senior Rater Evaluations" or "Nonconcur with Rater and Senior Rater Evaluations." His rater rated his overall potential for promotion as "Fully Capable," but his senior rater rated his overall potential for promotion as "4" (Fair). Department of the Army Pamphlet 623-3 states a rater's "Fully Capable" rating is a "strong recommendation for promotion" but a senior rater's rating of "4"...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012601
It instructs the reviewer to place an "X" in the appropriate box indicating either "Concur with Rater and Senior Rater Evaluations" or "Nonconcur with Rater and Senior Rater Evaluations." His rater rated his overall potential for promotion as "Fully Capable," but his senior rater rated his overall potential for promotion as "4" (Fair). Department of the Army Pamphlet 623-3 states a rater's "Fully Capable" rating is a "strong recommendation for promotion" but a senior rater's rating of "4"...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024397
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012935
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020677
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the rating period 10 July 2011 through 29 February 2012 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's contention that he wasnt properly counseled and should have been rated differently by his rater and senior rater on some...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021705
The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period 11 December 2009 through 10 October 2010 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) to show he received a "Success" rating in Part IVd (Rater Values/NCO Responsibilities Leadership). c. An unsigned third-party letter of support, dated 2 December 2013, from the Soldier who served as his rater during the period covered by the contested NCOER states: * he served as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004262
Counsel further states that the applicant had not received any negative counseling in the past, she was harassed for having a physical profile, and that the same company commander who approved the bar had approved her request for reenlistment three months earlier. The rater placed an "X" in the Needs Improvement box in Part VId (Leadership) and provided the following comments "lacks initiative and motivation as an NCO to provide direction to subordinate soldiers" and "lacks the knowledge on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021468
He states the basis of his appeal of the contested NCOER is substantive inaccuracy due to a "no" mark for integrity, a "needs improvement" mark in leadership, and a "Fair (4)" for overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility. (3) Paragraph 4-11 states to justify deletion or amendment of a report, the appellant will produce evidence that establishes clearly and convincingly that the presumption of regularity will not be applied to the report under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005855