MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 December 1998
DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-08738
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his release from the Army Reserves as an unsatisfactory participant be changed.
APPLICANT STATES: That he requested release from his unit on 2 May 1996 because of financial hardship. He was told that everything would be taken care of then he received orders assigning him to the USAR Control Group as an unsatisfactory participant.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was honorably discharged from the Regular Army in pay grade E-5 on 6 February 1995 after completing 8 years, 2 months and 6 days service. He enlisted in the USAR for 1-year, in grade E-5, on 26 September 1995.
On 16 January 1996 he receipted for a certified letter from his unit advising him that he was absent from unit training on 6 and 7 January 1996 and that unless his absence was excused, he would have accrued 4 unexcused absences in a 1-year period which commenced 6 January 1996.
On 2 May 1996 he was sent another absent from unit training letter for missing training on 13 and 14 April 1996. He was advised that since 6 January 1996 he had now accumulated 8 unexcused absences. The letter was sent to him by certified mail, but there is no indication that the he receipted for it.
On 26 June 1996 another certified letter was sent to him informing him that his absence from three of the four unit training assemblies on 22 and 23 June 1996 were unexcused and that he had now accrued 11 such absences in a 1-year period. The certified letter to him was not claimed.
The record contains no evidence that any of his unexcused absences were later reclassified as excused.
By order 250-38, effective 9 September 1996, the applicant was reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) for unsatisfactory participation.
Army Regulation 135-91, Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements and Enforcement Procedures, provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is an unsatisfactory participant when 9 or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1-year period.
The same regulation provides that a prescribed letter of instructions, unexcused absence, will be delivered to the soldier. Delivery will be either in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested. When certified mail is used, a copy of the notice and either a post office receipt confirming delivery or the returned unopened envelope showing the notice was not delivered will be placed in the soldiers MPRJ. Mail refused, unclaimed, or otherwise not delivered may not be used as defense against unexcused absences when notices were correctly addressed to the latest official mail address furnished to the unit by the soldier.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant was properly advised of the consequences of unexcused absences. The actions taken by his unit to advise him of his unexcused absences and to reassign him to the USAR Control Group for unsatisfactory participation were consistent with regulatory guidance. Despite his contention that he had made arrangements to be released from his unit for financial hardship, the record contains no evidence to support his claim.
2. It is difficult to believe that the applicant was unaware of his unexcused absences, even though he may not have received the notification letters for April and June absences, since he apparently attended unit training in February, March and May.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_JH_____ _FNE___ _TBR ___ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
INDEX
CASE ID
AC9708738
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
981209
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
950206
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
110.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708738
On 16 January 1996 he receipted for a certified letter from his unit advising him that he was absent from unit training on 6 and 7 January 1996 and that unless his absence was excused, he would have accrued 4 unexcused absences in a 1-year period which commenced 6 January 1996. On 26 June 1996 another certified letter was sent to him informing him that his absence from three of the four unit training assemblies on 22 and 23 June 1996 were unexcused and that he had now accrued 11 such...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007612C071029
Army Regulation 135-91 states general officer commanders are authorized to grant exceptions to unexcused absences. Army Regulation 135-91 states that, when the notices are personally delivered, the Soldier's signature will be obtained on the file copy as acknowledgment of receipt. The applicant next stated that, “…from his point of view at that time…” he was told that he was (i.e., a present action) in the “Inactive Army Ready Reserve.” It is acknowledged that the applicant had been in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008892
He and his commander signed this document wherein he stated: I, understand [that under the provisions of] [Army Regulation (AR)] 135-91 [Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures] and AR 135-178 [Enlisted Administrative Separations], as an Unsatisfactory Participant in the USAR unit to which I am assigned, [I] have been informed that I may receive a General Discharge. His record contains a letter from his commander, dated 21 May...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082577C070215
APPLICANT STATES : On his DA Form 1559-R (Inspector General Action Request), dated 25 August 2001, that he did not accrue 9 unexcused absences prior to being transferred to the IRR as an unsatisfactory participant. By endorsement dated 13 August 1998, the applicant informed the Commander, HHC, 7th ARCOM that Army Regulation 135-91 allowed for excused absences when circumstances beyond the soldier's control caused the absence. Army Regulation 135-91 states that general officer commanders...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019482
On 9 January 1982, he completed a Statement of Understanding of Reserve Obligation and Responsibilities and indicated he understood that if he were not excused from scheduled training periods by proper authority, he would be considered absent without leave (AWOL) and charged with an unexcused absence; that if he were charged with nine unexcused absences, he would be declared an unsatisfactory participant and be considered for separation under other than honorable conditions and subject to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007718C070208
The applicant did not appear. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. He signed the return receipt for the notification of his proposed separation on two separate occasions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011087
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to general under honorable conditions and a copy of his service records. The ABCMR corrects records; however, the Board is not the custodian of military records and therefore does not provide copies of military records. The applicant was required to attend all scheduled unit training assemblies and annual training periods and he was required to find a new Reserve unit in Delaware.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009936
The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 May 1986. CAL ARNG Form 614-10 (Letter of Notification Unexcused Absence) dated 21 July 1991 notified the applicant that unit attendance records showed he was absent from the scheduled unit training assemblies on 19, 20, and 21 July 1991 for a total of 5 unit training assemblies. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008609
Counsel provides: * Honorable Discharge Certificate, U.S. Navy, dated 14 November 1977 * extract of DA Form 61 (Application for Appointment), dated 21 July 1980 * DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 21 July 1980 * appointment letter, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC), St. Louis, MO, dated 20 November 1980 * Orders 29-10, Headquarters, 102nd U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command, St. Louis, MO, dated 7 April 1981 * diploma, Doctor of Dental...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089787C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that she enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 November 1987 for a period of 8 years under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). A review of the applicant's records shows no indication that the applicant was ever notified that she was being transferred to the IRR due to unsatisfactory participation. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to correct her records to show that as an exception to policy, she...