Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706667C070209
Original file (9706667C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


	IN THE CASE OF:   
	

	BOARD DATE:                              
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AC9706667

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr.


Chairperson

Mr.


Member

Mr.


Member

	Also present, without vote, were:







Analyst

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

	The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military 
                records
	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
	            advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, the narrative reason for her separation be deleted from her DD Form 214.  She states this derogatory remark on her file is hindering her from promotions in her civilian occupation.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted into the Regular Army on 17 October 1979.

On 11 August 1980 she was recommended for discharge due to unsuitability based on personality disorder.  She was medically evaluated by an Army Psychiatrist, and he determined that she was unsuitable based on her personality disorder, so he recommended she be discharged.

She was honorably discharged on 26 August 1980 under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-4b (unsuitability-personality disorder).  She had 10 months of service.

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board to have the narrative reason for discharge removed from her records.

Army Regulation 635-200 set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 13-4b, in effect at this time, authorized separation for Unsuitability-Personality Disorder.  The regulation authorized an Honorable Discharge for this purpose.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 26 August 1980, the date of discharge.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 26 August 1983.

The application is dated 3 March 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Loren G. Harrell
		Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706667

    Original file (9706667.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board to have the narrative reason for discharge removed from her records. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017168

    Original file (20090017168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 15 June 1981, the applicant received her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) showing she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), paragraph 13-4b, by reason of administrative discharge – unsuitability, personality disorder. There is no record to show the applicant applied to the Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014706

    Original file (20060014706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The psychiatrist recommended that the applicant be separated under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 600-200. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-4b of Army Regulation 635-200 for unsuitability due to personality disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016821

    Original file (20070016821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the narrative reason for separation be changed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 27 February 1980. However, evidence shows the applicant's DD Form 214 was authenticated at the time of his discharge with his signature. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-4b of Army Regulation 635-200 for unsuitability due to personality disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606461C070209

    Original file (9606461C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve in December 1972, served on active duty from February through November 1973, when she was honorably discharged. He stated, in effect, that there was no evidence of any medical condition which rendered the applicant medically unfit and justified physical disability processing. The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention at the time of her separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003803

    Original file (20080003803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show she was issued a fully honorable discharge or “dishonorable discharge” and that all references to any medical or mental condition be removed from her record. In order to justify correction of a military record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022641

    Original file (20110022641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 August 1980 as follows: * Separation authority * Separation program designator (SPD) code * Reenlistment (RE) code * Narrative reason for separation 2. However, his records contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows on 19 August 1980, he was honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003518

    Original file (20130003518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge for unsuitability - personality disorder was in error and without justification. On 28 September 1981: a. he was notified by his unit commander that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13-4b, unsuitability- personality disorder. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-4 at the time, provided for separation due to personality...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011228

    Original file (20120011228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 February 1980, an official of the 573rd Personnel Service Company, Fort Bragg, NC, initiated a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) adjusting her enlistment grade from E-1 to E-3 effective 5 February 1979 (date of enlistment) in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). She was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action for unsuitability, the type of discharge she could receive and its effect on further enlistment or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060269C070421

    Original file (2001060269C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which indicates that he suffered from any medically disqualifying condition which would have...