2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) be changed to reflect that he successfully completed twelve years of high school and that his Social Security Number (SSN) should be corrected to read
.
3. He was born on 18 August 1957. The applicants enlistment contract and other legal documents shows that he completed 11 years of formal education. On 6 July 1976, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years. The applicants enlistment contract and his entire military personnel file shows his SSN as
. The applicant completed basic training. The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-2.
4. On 24 November 1976, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for the wrongful possession of Marijuana. His imposed punishment was a reduction to pay grade E-1 and a forfeiture of $75 pay per month for 2 months.
5. On 29 March 1977, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-2 under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, paragraph 5, for failure to maintain acceptable standards for retention (Expeditious Discharge Program) with a general discharge. He had completed 8 months and 24 days of creditable active service.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicants SSN is
and not
.
2. The applicant also alleges that he completed 12 years of formal education. However, there is no evidence in support of this allegation. The applicants enlistment contract and other legal documents shows that he only completed 11 years of formal education at the time of enlistment.
3. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the record, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214), by showing that his SSN is
instead of
.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706194
The applicant’s enlistment contract and other legal documents shows that he completed 11 years of formal education. The applicant also alleges that he completed 12 years of formal education. The applicant’s enlistment contract and other legal documents shows that he only completed 11 years of formal education at the time of enlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608696C070209
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, he enlisted in the Regular Army in 1976; that because of his maturity and misconduct, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC). On 20 September 1976, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of service with a discharge UOTHC. On his enlistment agreement contract, which he authenticated with his signature, it states that he had no prior military service On 31...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013314
After he completed training, he was placed back on alert for Vietnam, at which time he lost his nerve and feared for his life. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in pay grade E-1 on 5 August 1970, for 3 years. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provided that a general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510570C070209
The applicants date of entry in the military service is correct as listed on his DD Form 214. The applicants date of discharge listed on his DD Form 214 is correct. NOTE: The Commander, ARPERCEN is requested to review the applicants DD Form 214 and make the necessary correction by changing the applicants date of rank to show 23 January 1975, instead of 23 January 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018390
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078222C070215
It shows his assignments and clearly indicates that he was assigned to perform duties in MOS 11D. The commander cited the bases for his recommendation were the applicant's AWOL offenses; his punishment record; and the fact that he was very unstable and he had many family problems. On 18 June 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707443C070209
On 1 October 1975, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for wrongfully possessing marijuana. On 11 January 1977, the applicant was discharged, with a discharge UOTHC, in pay grade E-1 for the good of the service. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709044C070209
He completed 12 years of formal education. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement. There is no evidence in the applicants record which indicates that his SSN is in error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709044
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the applicant’s record which indicates that his SSN is in error. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of the request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025103
He provides: * his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 January 1974 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 August 1981 * his signed affidavit (un-notarized) * an extract of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service), dated July 1966 COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. He indicated he understood that if his request for discharge under Army Regulation...