| Mr. | Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. | George D. Paxson | Member | |
| Ms. | Celia L Adolphi | Member |
| Mr. | Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Mr.. | Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOHC) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was the subject of mass punishment.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 5 June 1976 the applicant entered the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed One Station Unit Training at Fort Benning, Georgia, was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman), and sent to Fort Ord, California for his first permanent duty station.
The applicant’s record documents no individual acts of valor, achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and indicates the applicant never advanced beyond the rank of private/E-2. However, there is a record of repeated AWOL related disciplinary infractions which include the applicant accepting nonjudicial punishment (NJP), under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ.
On 31 October 1979 the applicant accepted an NJP for his first AWOL period of 28 days, between 13 September and 10 October 1979. His punishment for this offense was 14 days of restriction and extra duty.
The applicant had a second AWOL period of 8 days from 3 April to 11 April 1980. He again went AWOL from 15 April 1980 and remained away 195 days before returning to military control on 26 October 1980. The record also documents a 11 day period of confinement by civil authorities between 20 and 30 November 1980.
The evidence of record indicates that on 26 June 1980 a court-martial charge was preferred against the applicant for violation of Article 86 for his period of AWOL from 15 April to 26 October 1980. Although the applicant’s record is void of facts and circumstances concerning events that led to his discharge from the Army, it does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). This documents that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200, for administrative discharge-conduct triable by court-martial with a characterization of service of UOHC. This separation action could only have been accomplished after the applicant voluntarily requested separation from the Army in lieu of court-martial. In doing so, the applicant would have had to admit guilt to the stipulated offense or offenses for which he was charged.
The DD Form 214 also documents the applicant was discharged on 15 April 1981 after completing 1 year, 2 months, and 9 days of active military service and accruing 242 days of time lost due to AWOL and confinement.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges are preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no corroborating evidence to support the applicant’s contention that he was the subject of mass punishment. The Board examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and concluded the discrediting entries in the applicant’s record were not mitigated by prior or subsequent service of sufficient merit to warrant an upgrade of the discharge being reviewed.
2. The evidence of record, as documented by a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of administrative discharge-conduct triable by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board noted this separation action could only have been accomplished after the applicant voluntarily requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant would have had to admit guilt to the stipulated offense or offenses for which he was charged.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705772C070209
BOARD DATE: 3 June 1998 DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-05772 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOHC) be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709872
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705684
APPLICANT REQUESTS: The former service member’s (FSM) spouse requests, in effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOHC) be upgraded to honorable. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM’s military records show: On 3 January 1979 the FSM went AWOL from his unit at Fort Hood, Texas.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608125C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 2 April 1980 the applicant entered the Regular Army for 3 years at the age of 17. The applicants unit commander recommended approval of the applicants request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial and recommended the applicants be issued a UOHC. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709872C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707422
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 21 July 1980 the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709262
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711370
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709574
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705684C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: The former service members (FSM) spouse requests, in effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOHC) be upgraded to honorable. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSMs military records show: The FSM entered the Regular Army on 4 January 1977 for a period of 3 years. On 3 January...