Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | ||||
Mr. Kenneth Aucock | Analyst |
Mr. James E. Vick | Chairperson | ||||
Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Member | ||||
Mr. Thomas D. Kuhn | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS
: In effect, the applicant requests that his record reflect that his reduction from Sergeant E-5 to Specialist Four E-4 on 26 February 1985 be declared null and void, and that he receive retroactive pay and allowances in pay grade E-5 up until his discharge on 6 August 1985.
The applicant was reduced to pay grade E-4 on 26 February 1985. The applicant’s commander directed that the record of nonjudicial punishment be filed in the applicant’s restricted portion of his official file. Information concerning the specific reason for his reduction is not available.
The applicant was AWOL from 13 March until 29 March 1985.
On 21 June 1985 the applicant’s commanding officer notified him that he was being recommended for elimination from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-13. The applicant acknowledged receipt of this notification, waived consulting counsel and waived consideration of his case by a board of officers. He declined to submit statements in his own behalf.
On 22 July 1985 the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the Army because of a personality disorder. That official stated that a psychiatric evaluation was submitted with his recommendation. On 25 July 1985 the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that the applicant be granted an honorable discharge. He was discharged on 6 August 1985 in the pay grade of E-4. The narrative reason for his discharge was “personality disorder.” He had a total of
3 years, 9 months, and 6 days of service during his latest period of service, and 16 days of lost time.
DETERMINATION
: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707715C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant was reduced to pay grade E-4 on 26 February 1985. The applicants commander directed that the record of nonjudicial punishment be filed in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199708967
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s service record indicates that the applicant was awarded the Silver Star award on 12 June 1971 by General Order #87.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708967
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s service record indicates that the applicant was awarded the Silver Star award on 12 June 1971 by General Order #87.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199709323
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show that he was separated by reason of physical disability. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710284C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 15 April 1960, he was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209, unsuitability, character behavior disorder, with a general discharge. There is no evidence the applicant ever submitted an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB); for an upgraded discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710284
On 18 May 1959, the applicant was convicted by special court-martial for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 20 March - 23 April 1959. On 15 April 1960, he was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209, unsuitability, character behavior disorder, with a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-209 set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unsuitability.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708825
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708673
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT STATES : In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707182
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708967C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge and that he be issued a citation for his Silver Star award. The applicants service record indicates that the applicant was awarded the Silver Star award on 12 June 1971 by General Order #87. ...