Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707237C070209
Original file (199707237C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


	IN THE CASE OF:   
	


	BOARD DATE:           14 January 1999                   
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AC98-07237
				   AR1999016000

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.



Member

	The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military 
                records
	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
	            advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS:  Correction of the deceased former service member’s (FSM) military records to show that he elected participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for his former spouse.

APPLICANT STATES:  That her former husband, the deceased FSM, was ordered by the county court in Arkansas to maintain her as a named beneficiary on his SBP after the divorce.  She also states in a follow-up letter that it was always his intent to take care of her after the divorce and in the event of his death.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The deceased FSM’s military records show:

He was married to the applicant on 6 March 1950.  He enlisted and entered active duty on 6 June 1950 with prior Navy service.  He remained on active duty until his retirement on 30 November 1970.

Information provided by the office of retirement services for the Army shows that the FSM elected spouse only coverage in the SBP program on 1 April 1973.  He and the applicant were divorced on 23 May 1983 and the applicant lost her eligibility for SBP coverage.  Although the state court ordered the FSM to maintain SBP coverage for his former spouse (applicant) it was unenforceable because there was no provision of Federal law that permitted divorce courts to order former spouse SBP coverage until Public Law 99-661 was enacted on 14 November 1986.  This law required the retiree to request the SBP change within one year after the divorce but the FSM and the applicant were divorced in 1983, three years before the law was passed.

In May 1984 the FSM was informed by the Army Finance Center that SBP coverage for his former spouse was terminated effective 23 May 1983 due to divorce and his new spouse was eligible for SBP coverage on the first anniversary of his remarriage.

In January and February 1989 the FSM wrote to the Army Finance Center to obtain the necessary forms to cancel his SBP coverage.  There is no record that he ever acted to cancel SBP coverage.  The FSM died on 15 December 1997 with spouse only SBP coverage in effect for the second spouse.

In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from HQDA, Army Retirement Services who recommend denial of the applicant’s request.  The opinion notes the legally unenforceable provision of former spouse SBP coverage in the divorce proceedings and the inaction by the FSM to provide for his former spouse (applicant) after the law allowed for such an election.


DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The deceased FSM’s SBP coverage for the applicant was properly terminated effective 23 May 1983 based on their divorce in accordance with the laws and regulations in effect at the time.

3.  The appropriate finance center properly made all changes requested by the deceased FSM based on changes in his marital status.  The actions by the Army in this case were proper, and there is no doubt to be resolved in favor of the applicant.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RVO_____  SLP_____  KAN_____  DENY APPLICATION




						Loren G. Harrell
						Director



INDEX

CASE ID
AC98-07237/AR1999016000
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
19990114
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
137.01
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707237

    Original file (199707237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of the deceased former service member’s (FSM) military records to show that he elected participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for his former spouse. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The deceased FSM’s military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553

    Original file (20060013553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005896

    Original file (20110005896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 September 2010, the applicant made application to the court to amend its previous order by showing that the FSM fraudulently submitted a spouse concurrence statement declining SBP coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. In September 2010, the applicant requested the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000163

    Original file (20140000163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter provided by the applicant from DFAS indicates that she was denied an SBP annuity because no election was made by the applicant or the FSM for former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce. Although there is no conclusive evidence that shows a proper former spouse election was made by the FSM, the applicant, or her attorney, the available evidence suggests that it was the FSM’s intention to provide an SBP annuity for the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011097

    Original file (20140011097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Although there is no conclusive evidence that shows a proper former spouse election was made by the FSM, the applicant, or her attorney, the available evidence suggests that it was the FSM’s intention to provide an SBP annuity for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060366C070421

    Original file (2001060366C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he did not cancel his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage but instead changed it to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091605C070212

    Original file (2003091605C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that she be determined to be the beneficiary of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM). The applicant provides the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 January 1964; their marriage license; his death certificate; a copy of a letter to her from the FSM dated 12 April 1983; a letter from the Chief, Army Retirement Services to the applicant dated 16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003265C070205

    Original file (20060003265C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states that they were legally separated on 7 November 1977 and the decision to conclude with a divorce was made in March 1980 prior to the FSM’s retirement. He should not have been paying SBP premiums from on or about 10 June 1980, when they divorced, until 24 September 1983, when former spouse coverage for retired members was established. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018306

    Original file (20100018306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected her as his former spouse to be the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The court order directed that the applicant receive 45 percent of the applicant's Army retired pay benefits. The law also permits the former spouse concerned to request a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made within 1 year of a date of a...