Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610986C070209
Original file (9610986C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 23, Type of Separation, have “Honorable” entered.

3.  He states that item 23 on his DD Form 214 was inadvertently left blank.

4.  His military records show that he was retired for years of service on 28 February 1994.  The DD Form 214 he was issued has both item 23 and item 24, Character of Service, left blank.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 provides guidance on the entries to be made on DD Forms 214.  This regulation specifies that item 23 must have one of seven types of separation entered, one of which being “Retirement”, and item 24 must have one of six characterizations of service entered, one of which being “Honorable.”

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214, items 23 and 24, have both been left blank in contravention with Army Regulation 635-5.

2.  The applicant was retired for years of service, denoting long, honorable service.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by showing that DD Form 214 of the individual concerned for the period ending 28 February 1994 have “Retirement” entered in item 23, Type of Separation; and

	b.  by entering “Honorable” in his DD Form 214, item 24, Character of Service.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000626

    Original file (20090000626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims that prior to his 16 August 1991 REFRAD, he had been issued five other separation documents, which characterized his service as “Honorable” and that he had continuously served in an active status in either the United States Army Reserve (USAR) or Army National Guard (ARNG), in both a commissioned and enlisted status, from 9 November 1976 through his placement on the Retired List on 7 July 1994, with no break in service. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012793

    Original file (20060012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the entries at Item 11 (Primary Specialty) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected. The records show the applicant entered active duty on 16 February 1973, completed training, and was awarded the MOS 11B. Item 11, on the 28 February 1995 DD Form 214, shows service in MOS 11B5O of 0 years and 0 months and in MOS 63B5O of 17 years and 2 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018380

    Original file (20120018380.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully considering the evidence of record, the board found the applicant unsuitable for further military service. The board recommended she be discharged for unsuitability with a general discharge under honorable conditions. Action would be taken to discharge an individual for unsuitability only when, in the commander's opinion, it was clearly established that: the individual was unlikely to develop sufficiently to participate in further military training and/or become a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076185C070215

    Original file (2002076185C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the reason for his discharge be changed and that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation) be corrected by changing his last duty assignment and by listing his secondary military occupational specialty (MOS), accrued leave, and security clearance and awards. The applicant states, in effect, that although he is grateful that the Army Discharge Review Board changed his discharge to honorable, he believes that the reason (unsuitability) used to discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004554

    Original file (20110004554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was medically retired with 19 years, 9 months, and 1 day of active service. [The applicant retired from active duty on 6 May 1995.] The evidence of record confirms the applicant's adjusted BASD was 6 August 1975 and that he completed 19 years, 9 months, and 1 day of total AD service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015617

    Original file (20140015617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – lieutenant colonel (LTC) instead of major (MAJ) * item 4b (Pay Grade) – O-5 instead of O-4 * item 12b (Separation Date this Period) – 18 March 1996 instead of 17 April 1991 * item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 29 June 1995 instead of 29 June 1989 * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011507C070208

    Original file (20040011507C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), and his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to reflect non-completion instead of failure to complete the Field Artillery Officer Basic Course (FAOBC) at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. The applicant states that his records are in error because he resigned his commission in February 1994 at the FAOBC. He states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004497

    Original file (20140004497.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states: * he would like an upgrade because his former wife was killed in 1978, which was the reason for his going absent without leave (AWOL) * "HONORABLE" is misspelled in item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * all of the dates are not on his record of service (DD Form 214) 3. Although an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004497 (2)

    Original file (20140004497 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states: * he would like an upgrade because his former wife was killed in 1978, which was the reason for his going absent without leave (AWOL) * "HONORABLE" is misspelled in item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * all of the dates are not on his record of service (DD Form 214) 3. Although an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004497

    Original file (20140004497 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states: * he would like an upgrade because his former wife was killed in 1978, which was the reason for his going absent without leave (AWOL) * "HONORABLE" is misspelled in item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * all of the dates are not on his record of service (DD Form 214) 3. Although an...