Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610834aC070209
Original file (9610834aC070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his record be corrected to show service on Eniwetok during the Korean Conflict.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he served on Eniwetok from March 1950 to June or July 1951.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

On 8 September 1948, he enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 3271 (Stevedore).

Records show that between 5-17 June 1951, after serving from March 1950, he proceeded from Eniwetok, Marshall Islands, to San Francisco Port of Embarkation; to Camp Stoneman, California; and, ultimately, to Fort Lawton, Washington.

On 14 September 1951, he was honorably separated under Army Regulation 615-360, based on the expiration of his term of service.  His Report of Separation indicates that he had    3 years and 7 days of creditable service.  He had 1 year,   3 months and 29 days of foreign and/or sea service.

Army Regulation 635-5, then in effect, did not allow for the placement of specific oversea locations on the Report of Separation, only the amount of time served.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The applicantÂ’s Report of Separation currently indicates the amount of his foreign service; however, there are no provisions for which the specific location may be entered.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the appellantÂ’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022700

    Original file (20100022700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served at Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands from 1955 to 1956. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 32 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 17 October 1957 the entry "Service at Eniwetok...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003612

    Original file (20120003612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of any awards and decorations to which he is entitled, to include the: * National Defense Service Medal * United Nations Service Medal (Korea) * Army Good Conduct Medal * Korean Service Medal with all bronze service stars * Republic of Korea Korean (War) Service Medal * Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation * Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009542

    Original file (20120009542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his appointment documents, active duty orders, and DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, 60 years later to show he should have been appointed in the grade of CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022481

    Original file (20110022481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Component and Branch or Class) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was in the Army Security Agency (ASA) as opposed to the Signal Corps. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. He contends his branch was not Signal Corps and his DD Form 214 should show his branch as Army Security Agency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015432

    Original file (20130015432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 January 1951 through 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003271

    Original file (20140003271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 shows: * he was promoted to the temporary rank of corporal on 11 November 1951 * he completed 11 months and 6 days of foreign service * he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star * United Nations Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019926

    Original file (20120019926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Based on the available evidence, a calculation of the approximate period of his service in Korea shows the following: 1951 01 02 approximate date of deployment to Korea + 0 11 24 total foreign service (from DD Form 214) = 1951 12 26 or 26 December 1951 - date returned to United States c. Thus, based on the available evidence, it is reasonable to conclude that the applicant served in Korea from 2 January 1951...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064011C070421

    Original file (2001064011C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that he is entitled to the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars and the United Nations Medal Service Medal based on award of the Korean Service Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing in item 27 (Decorations and Awards) of his DD Form 214, dated 10 July 1952, that he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010607

    Original file (20110010607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant attained the rank of corporal with just over 2 years of active service, he served in Alaska for 15 months, he had no time lost during the period under review, and he was honorably discharged with 3 years of active military service. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 June 1947 through 16 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006107

    Original file (20110006107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's NPRC file does not include any documents to show the applicant's USAR service. b. Paragraph 5-9 provides for award of the KSM and it states that the KSM is awarded for service in Korea between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954 and that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the ROK. However, in the event the applicant was seeking award of the ARCAM, the evidence of record does not...