Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610831C070209
Original file (9610831C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  In effect, the applicant requests physical disability retirement, and all his awards and decorations.  He states that he was physically handicapped in both legs and his back at the time of his discharge and also had hypertension and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  

3.  The applicant entered the Army on 31 March 1964, completed training and was assigned an artillery unit in Hawaii, later transferring to Thailand, and returning to Hawaii with his unit in September 1965.  In January 1966 he was assigned to Vietnam, completed his tour of duty, and was discharged on 18 January 1967. 

4.  The applicant reenlisted on 29 November 1968, was assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas, then to an artillery unit in Germany, and in November 1970 returned to Vietnam.  He completed his tour and was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas.  He was discharged on 23 July 1973.

5.  The applicant’s DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) show that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with first oak leaf cluster, and the Purple Heart.  The applicant was also awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, which are not shown on his DD Form 214.  During his two tours in Vietnam, the applicant participated in five campaigns.  Award of the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars credits the applicant with participation in only two campaigns.

6.  A 2 April 1973 report of medical examination indicates that the applicant was medically qualified for separation with a physical profile of 1 1 1 1 1 1.  The applicant stated that he was in fair health.

7.  On 26 February 1993 the VA denied the applicant’s claim for service connected disability for a neck injury, vein problem in legs, eye condition, combat wounds to legs and a stomach problem.  The applicant was awarded a zero percent 
service connected disability rating for a shrapnel wound to the back.  The VA denied the applicant’s claim for increased service connected compensation for hypertensive heart disease, PTSD, and hearing loss. 

8.  Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.

9.  Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

10.  Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, 
the Good Conduct Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  He participated in five campaigns during his two tours in Vietnam and should 
have been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star (NOTE:  A silver service star is awarded in lieu of five bronze service stars).  All of the applicant’s authorized awards should be shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's continued performance of duty raised a presumption of fitness which he has not overcome by evidence of any unfitting, acute, grave illness or injury concomitant with his separation.

3.  The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention at the time of his separation.  He has submitted no probative medical evidence to the contrary.

4.  The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency.  It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes.

5.  An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation.  The VA is not required to find unfitness for duty.  Operating under its own policies and regulations, the VA awards ratings because a medical condition is related to service, i.e., service-connected.  Furthermore, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.  The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.

6.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1.  That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star.

2.  That so much of the application as in excess of the foregoing be denied.                  

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011655

    Original file (20100011655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It may also be overcome if acute, grave illness or injury, or other deterioration of the Soldier's physical condition occurred immediately prior to, or coincident with, processing for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability which rendered the Soldier unfit for further duty. The FSM's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064938C070421

    Original file (2001064938C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that Company F, 52d Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation for the period 20 December 1967 – July 1968. The Board notes that the applicant had a permanent L3 physical profile as a result of his second set of injuries received in combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064686C070421

    Original file (2001064686C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    With the loss of his eye, he was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board and subsequently to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) correctly shows that he participated in five campaign periods during his service in Vietnam. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned is awarded the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Service Medal with a silver service star, Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007199C070208

    Original file (20040007199C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Kenneth Wright | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, the applicant requests that his record be corrected to show he was released from active duty because of a physical disability, with a 10 percent disability rating, and that he be awarded a Purple Heart because of his injury. Accordingly, the applicant was separated from active duty for reasons other than physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071274C070402

    Original file (2002071274C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart, physical disability retirement or separation, and deletion of the AWOL entry in his records. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s enlisted qualification record does not show that he was wounded in action, nor does it show award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090051C070212

    Original file (2003090051C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Battalion, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, by Department of the Army (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971; and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023014

    Original file (20100023014.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's final DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals , Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons) shows his awards as the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign ribbon with Device (1960) and one Overseas Bar. At that time, a DD Form 214 listed only awards received during that period of service. The applicant wants all of his awards to include the Army Commendation Medal, 10% disability due to hypertension and his education...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002785

    Original file (20080002785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. he has sufficient medical proof and examination of combat disabilities to show that the Army should have granted him a medical discharge or retirement under honorable conditions; b. his combat record shows that, as a medic, he was involved in 4 separate acts in a 15-hour period. The applicant's VA examination reports show he was diagnosed and evaluated by the VA some 35 years after his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record shows that: a. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002280

    Original file (20140002280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Honor Medal Second Class Citation * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star * Purple Heart * any unit awards he is entitled to based on his service in Vietnam 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057759C070420

    Original file (2001057759C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he should have received a complete physical examination before being discharged from the Army Reserves. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years on 16 May 1977. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 3 years on 22 August 1992.