Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610462C070209
Original file (9610462C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his records be corrected to show his entitlement to award of the Purple Heart (PH), in order that he may obtain PH license plates in his home state.

APPLICANT STATES:  He claims to have been wounded in action (WIA) in September 1966.  He is in receipt of a 30 percent service-connected disability rating by the VA, however, those records are not available due to an action he is pursuing with that agency.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military and medical records show:

On 8 July 1964, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 730 (Finance Clerk).  His MOS was later changed to 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

On 22 September 1966, while serving in the RVN, he accepted NJP for carelessly discharging his weapon while on patrol on 15 September 1966. His punishment was a forfeiture.

On 23 December 1966, at his normal rotation, he was reassigned from the 21st Casualty Staging Flight to the Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, Illinois.  There is no conformation available as to the basis for this move.

On 20 January 1967, he was assigned to full duty, with a physical profile of 111111A, to Fort Carson, Colorado, in MOS 11B, which was an acceptable assignment for MOS 11C. 

On 17 July 1967, a physical examination cleared him for separation.  The examination noted that he had a GSW to the right arm and had been treated at the 36th Medical Evacuation Hospital, Vung Tau, RVN, however, the date is not shown.  There was no indication that the GSW was a result of hostile action.

On 27 September 1967, he was honorably separated, under Army Regulation 635-200, based on the expiration of his term of service.  The appropriate section of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) makes no mention of any wounds incurred as a result of hostile action.  His Report of Separation indicates that he had 3 years of creditable service and 82 days of lost time.  He was authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the RVN Campaign Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge.
Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, indicates, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to soldiers who are wounded as a result of hostile action and are treated by a medical officer and that treatment is recorded in the official record.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  While there is evidence the applicant received a GSW to the right arm, there is no evidence indicating this was the result of hostile action.

3.  The Board notes that during the period in question, the applicant accepted NJP for carelessly discharging his weapon while on patrol.  However, there is no indication that he was wounded.

4.  The VA may award compensation based on the fact that a condition or injury exists, however, they may not judge whether the warrants an award from the Army.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070531C070402

    Original file (2002070531C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show the Presidential Unit Citation, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm, the RVN Civil Actions Honor,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064087C070421

    Original file (2001064087C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the PH. His DD Form 214 also does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and there is no evidence that he was ever denied the award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show award of the PH, the GCMDL, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005303

    Original file (20080005303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), and to receive those awards the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) previously indicated he was entitled to. During its original deliberations in this case, the Board concluded that there was no evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, or that he was ever treated for combat-related wounds by military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058621C070421

    Original file (2001058621C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show he was awarded the PH and other combat medals he earned during his active duty tenure. The Board did find that the evidence of record sufficiently documents the applicant’s participation in combat as an infantryman, assigned to an infantry unit, who had been involved in combat operations during his assignment tenure in the RVN. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004705

    Original file (20130004705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). 12 Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010876C080407

    Original file (20070010876C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever wounded in action or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving in the RVN. The PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41, and the applicant last audited the DA Form 20 on 28 March 1968, nearly a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007864

    Original file (20080007864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available medical evidence shows that the applicant received a fracture to his right tibia in October 1967. There is no evidence the applicant received a fractured tibia as a result of enemy action. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089097C070403

    Original file (2003089097C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he received the PH on 30 September 1967. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1965 for a period of 3 years. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show awards which were omitted through administrative error at the time the applicant was separated from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076090C070215

    Original file (2002076090C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign participated in while serving in the RVN. Lacking any derogatory information on file and/or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, which would preclude him from receiving the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant served a qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000038

    Original file (20080000038.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant was awarded the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 10 December 1965 through 9 December 1967, and that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, he is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and 2 bronze...