Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610406C070209
Original file (9610406C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that he be credited with 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay.

3.  He states that he was told that he had 20 qualifying years of service when he was discharged.  He was later told that he only had 19 years, 11 months and 28 days of qualifying service and, therefore, was not entitled to retired pay.

4.  The applicant's military records show that he was born on 26 February 1932.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 1 March 1949 at the age of 17, served continuously through reenlistments and extensions, served as a wireman, personnel carrier driver and senior vehicle repairman, and was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service on 28 February 1969 in pay grade E-5.  He had turned age 37 two days before his discharge.  The NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, he was issued, item 26 (length this service) and item 27 (total service for pay purposes) both have 20 years, 0 months and 0 days entered.

5.  Contained in the applicant’s records is an endorsement from the applicant’s ARNG state adjutant general, dated 18 June 1968, wherein it was stated that the applicant had accrued 18 years, 3 months and 30 days of creditable service as of 30 June 1968.

6.  Also contained in the applicant’s records is an NGB Form 22A, Correction to NGB Form 22, dated 24 March 1969, wherein item 26 (length this service) was changed from 20 years to 7 years, 11 months and 28 days, and item 27 (total service for pay purposes) was changed from 20 years to 19 years, 11 months and 28 days.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1331, provides for the retirement of Reservists, upon application, who have at least 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay (a qualifying year of service is one in which the Reservist earns at least 50 retirement points) when they reach the age of 60.

8.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB.  The NGB confirmed that the applicant has 19 years, 11 months and 28 days of qualifying service, and opines that the applicant had reason to believe that he had completed 20 years of qualifying service since after he had been notified that he had completed 18 years, 3 months and 30 days of service, he served an additional 1 year and 8 months from the date of that notification, which would appear to give him 20 years of service.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record supports the NGB’s assessment that the applicant had reason to believe that he had completed 20 years of qualifying service.

2.  It is reasonable to presume that the applicant did not receive the correction to his NGB Form 22.  It is incomprehensible to think that an individual who after completing 19 years, 11 months and 28 days of continuous qualifying service for retired pay and requires only 2 more days of drills, one weekend, to qualify for such pay would not have taken some action, such as extending his enlistment, to perform that duty.

3.  Further, an individual who has completed more than 18 years of qualifying service should be retained until completion of 20 years of service unless separated sooner for cause.  The mere correction of his NGB Form 22 does not suffice to ensure his rights are protected.  Because of problems like this, the law now states that if a soldier has over 18 years of service, he must be counseled and must not be prevented from extending his enlistment to the date he reaches retirement eligibility, providing he or she is otherwise qualified.  The Board believes that these current standards should be applied in the applicant’s case.

4.  As such, the Board considers that the mistake made by the ARNG in calculating his qualifying service resulted in the applicant’s separation 2 days prior to his accruing sufficient qualifying service to collect retired pay at age 60.  The applicant should not be penalized for that mistake.

5.  In view of the preceding conclusions, it would be in the interest of justice to credit the applicant with 20 qualifying years of service, as he had been told that he had completed.

6.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by issuing to the individual concerned a 20-year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at the age of 60;

	b.  by crediting him with 20 years, 0 months and 0 days of qualifying service; and

	c.  by showing that he applied for retired pay in a timely fashion.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014423

    Original file (20110014423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The authority for discharging Soldiers from a State ARNG is the Adjutant General of the State with the exception of those Soldiers who are within 2 years of completing service required for retired pay. However, there is no evidence of record to show he was ever discharged from the USAR or transferred to the Retired Reserve on that date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * adjusting his chronological...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001123

    Original file (20120001123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his entitlement to retired pay and associated benefits at age 60. On 2 June 1970, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and he served until he was discharged on 10 September 1972. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022139

    Original file (20110022139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He remained in the IRR until his discharge on 21 May 1995. d. Several years later he received a letter from the U.S. Army Retired Reserve Personnel Command (correctly known as the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) at the time) asking him whether he wanted to receive his final discharge or be placed in the Retired Reserve. b. Paragraph 2-9 states that active status in the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve, and the Active National Guard after 30 June 1949, but insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001302

    Original file (20150001302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * correction of his record to show he is eligible to receive nonregular retired pay upon reaching 60 years of age * correction of his record to show he is eligible for back pay for officers with prior enlisted service (O-E) * removal of a suspension of favorable personnel actions (Flag) based on an Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) 2. c. The NGB conducted a thorough review of his personnel and retirement records and it was determined that he had not earned the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610294C070209

    Original file (9610294C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An NGB Form 23, Army National Guard Retirement Credits Record, show that the applicant had qualifying years of service from the date of his enlistment on 2 December 1970 to the date of his discharge on 1 December 1980, for a total of 10 qualifying years of service for retired pay. The Adjutant General stated that the applicant has only completed 14 qualifying years of service for retired pay. Those 2 years, plus his 2 years of active duty, plus his 10 years of continuous service in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003659

    Original file (20110003659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not have 20 years of creditable service for eligibility to a non-regular retirement at the time he was separated from the ARNG in May 1992. Additional factors making a denial inequitable are: a. the applicant provided honorable service spanning a period of over 23 years, of which he is shown to have 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days of creditable service for retirement; b. the applicant had over 15 years of service as of 1 October 1991 and would have qualified under Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060808C070421

    Original file (2001060808C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect sufficient Reserve Component service credit to receive retired pay. For the time that the applicant was appointed an officer in the ARNG, 1 June 1955 through 28 February 1959, only the period of 1 June 1955 through 6 June 1956, is credited with retirement points as 1 year creditable for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104809C070208

    Original file (2004104809C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years for a non-regular retirement. The advisory opinion noted that the Retirements and Annuities Section attempted to obtain additional documentation from the Alabama ARNG but, as of 9 April 2004, no additional documentation had been provided, in part, because the retirement section of the Alabama ARNG had been eliminated. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012394

    Original file (20100012394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also submits a letter dated 29 January 2010 from the KYARNG Director of Administrative Service who states he conducted a review of the applicant's records and following discussions with the SJA and Personnel Directorate (J1), along with the state attorney and former SJA, he believes the applicant was summarily discharged from the KYARNG without appropriate due process. The applicant had 18 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes at the time of his discharge from...