Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610225C070209
Original file (9610225C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


	IN THE CASE OF:.
	    


	BOARD DATE:            2 December 1998                  
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AC96-10225

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




	The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military 
                records
	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
	            advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That her records be corrected to show she was discharged for her physical disability, with compensation.

APPLICANT STATES:  That all injuries occurred before entering service; that she was unfit to stay in the service; that her condition became worse after entering the service; and, that she should receive some kind of compensation for her new injuries.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show she enlisted on 25 August 1995.  She was discharged, on 13 December 1995, under Army Regulation 635-200, for her failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards.

Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings, dated 28 November 1995, diagnosed her condition as chronic retropatellar pain syndrome, right, secondary to abnormal Q-angle, which had existed prior to service.  The EPSBD recommended she be discharged from the service.

The applicant concurred with the EPSBD findings and recommendations and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay on 5 December 1995.  The appropriate authority approved her request on 7 December 1995.

Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-9, provides for a separation to be described as an entry level separation (uncharacterized) if processing is initiated while a member is in an entry level status.

Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph      5-11 covers the separation of personnel who do not meet procurement medical fitness standards.  In pertinent part, it provides that personnel not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who become medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty for training for initial entry training, will be separated.  Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the soldier’s initial entrance on active duty.  This medical condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified them for entry on active duty for initial entry training had it been detected at the time and does not disqualify them for retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3.


Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3, sets forth the medical fitness standards for retention, promotion and separation in the active Army, Army National Guard and the Army Reserve.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  She was on active duty from 25 August to 13 December 1995, a total of         3 months and 19 days.  Shortly after entrance on active duty, competent medical authority determined the applicant was medically unfit for entrance on active duty due to a medical condition which was incurred prior to entry on active duty. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged without disability benefits from the Army.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RVO____  GDP____  JHK_____  DENY APPLICATION




						Loren G. Harrell
						       Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008630

    Original file (20120008630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 August 1995, she had two more episodes of palpitations and dizziness. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel: a. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provided that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008441

    Original file (20130008441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054158C070420

    Original file (2001054158C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017536

    Original file (20100017536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 October 1989, an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) evaluated her for a seizure disorder. The board found she did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation, 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11, her conditions were EPTS, and they were not service-aggravated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that: * a medical condition was identified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016567

    Original file (20100016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a copy of her SSA decision record which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019024

    Original file (20130019024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The EPSBD found that the applicant had an unstable left knee and accordingly recommended her separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002665

    Original file (20090002665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluating physician recommended on the DA Form 4707 that the applicant should be separated for not meeting the entrance standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness). A medical proceeding conducted by an entrance physical standards board (EPSBD), regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001377

    Original file (20140001377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The military doctor determined she was medically unacceptable for service in the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 2, paragraph 2-32, and that she should be separated from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). On 10 August 1990, the discharge authority approved the applicant's separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017473

    Original file (20090017473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 22 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090017473 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * she received an uncharacterized discharge that occurred during basic training * she had a medical examination by a doctor in an orthopedic clinic prior to her enlistment and she had an induction physical both of which she passed * she had a minor injury in 2001 and an orthopedic doctor stated she had recovered and was at 100 percent strength and had use of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018637

    Original file (20120018637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her: * years of service as January 2002 to April 2008 vice January to April 2008 * rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice private (PV1)/E-1 * foreign service for her two tours of Iraq * military occupational specialty (MOS) as 31B (Military Police) vice none * reason for discharge as medical vice failed medical/physical/procurement standards * Purple Heart and Iraq Campaign...