Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609891C070209
Original file (9609891C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That he be reconsidered for promotion for major with his military records reflecting that he has two bachelor of science (BS) degrees.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he is fully qualified for promotion to major.  He has completed all required military and civilian educational requirements.

In support of his application he submits proof that he was awarded two BS degrees.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

In the processing of this case an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  The PERSCOM stated that the applicant’s record was complete when it was considered by the 1996 promotion selection board.  He was not selected for promotion because he had not completed Combined Arms and Service Staff School.  That he completed that school after the selection board adjourned does not entitle him to be reconsidered for promotion.

Army Regulation 135-155, Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers, requires the mandatory consideration of USAR commissioned officers for promotion to the next higher grade at specified times in their careers as determined by the officer’s years in grade and years of commissioned service.  While promotion consideration is mandatory, selection for promotion is contingent on an officer meeting promotion eligibility requirements and whether he or she has satisfactorily participated in Reserve training.  Mandatory promotion consideration to major occurs at 7 years time in grade as a captain.  Paragraph 2-6 and table 2-1.1 specify that to be selected for promotion to major, a captain must complete CAS3 not later than the date the selection board convenes. 

Implicit in the Army's promotion system is the universally accepted principal that officers have a responsibility for their own careers.  The general requirements and workings of the system are widely known and specific details such as selection board dates, eligibility requirements and promotion zones are widely published in official and quasi-official publications and official communications.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1.  The applicant records were complete and there is no indication that it did not contain documentation which showed that he had completed two BS degrees when he was considered for promotion.  As such there is no material error in which to base a promotion reconsideration in his case.

2.  The foregoing findings and conclusions are in consonance with the advisory opinion from the PERSCOM.

3.  In view of the forgoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091205C070212

    Original file (2003091205C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration to major under the criteria 1998 through 2000 by a United States Army Reserve (USAR) promotion board and promotion to major in the USAR. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, verified the applicant is currently still in an active duty status and has been considered and selected for promotion to major by a active duty promotion board. The regulation further specifies that an officer who has an established date for removal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078832C070215

    Original file (2002078832C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, stated that their office had the authority to grant an educational waiver for an upcoming RCSB only and the request must be received in their office prior to the convening date of the selection board. The applicant did not request a waiver prior to the convening date of the 2002 board; therefore, their office denied his request. However, based on the fact that the applicant had not completed his military education by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097212C070212

    Original file (03097212C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The TADLP Enrollment History, provided by the applicant, indicates that in July 2003, just prior to receiving notification that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to major a second time, the applicant enrolled in the Reserve Component Transportation Officer Advanced Course Phase I. All 12 courses associated with that OAC were issued to the applicant on 10 July 2003 and by 29 September 2003 the applicant had completed all of the course requirements. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087567C070212

    Original file (2003087567C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was passed over for the education requirement on his 2001 captain board and disallowed a special selection board (SSB), despite being educationally qualified at the time of the board. The Board concludes that it would be unjust to deny the applicant promotion reconsideration based on the technicality that his degree was not formally conferred prior to the convening date of the 2001 promotion board given he had completed all the academic requirements for a BS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015606

    Original file (20080015606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion packet was considered by the 2008 Major Army Promotion List (APL) Board, however, he was not selected for promotion due to lack of an education waiver. The memorandum, further alerted the applicant to the mandatory education requirements for promotion as specified in Army Regulation (AR) 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and warrant Officers Other than General Officers) and that if he had completed the education requirements not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078288C070215

    Original file (2002078288C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation provides that in order to be qualified for promotion to major an individual must have completed 7 years of time in grade as a captain and an officer advanced course on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The evidence of record clearly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091212C070212

    Original file (2003091212C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major under the 2003 criteria. The Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that the applicant was considered and not recommended for promotion to major by the 2002 RCSB because her record did not contain evidence that she had completed a baccalaureate degree or an OAC. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM can only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051960C070420

    Original file (2001051960C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that her civilian and military education and two officer evaluation reports (OER’s) were missing from her records when they were reviewed by the 1997 Reserve Major Promotion Board. Her records did not contain material error when considered by the 1997 and 1998 selection boards. In view of the facts presented, it was recommended that the applicant’s request be denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017581

    Original file (20080017581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he met the requirements for requesting an education waiver and submitted the request for a military education waiver to his branch manager prior to the Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08) Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The letter also notified him that the records reviewed by the RCSB did not indicate he had completed the required military education by the date the board convened and that he should review the mandatory education requirements for promotion as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090992C070212

    Original file (2003090992C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 October 2000, he was promoted to major by AR-PERSCOM with a date of rank of 1 September 1992 (the date of his appointment as a Reserve captain), based on the selection for promotion by the 1993 RCSB. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers) specifies that mandatory selection boards will be convened each year to consider Reserve and ARNG officers for promotion to captain through lieutenant colonel. The applicant is entitled to correction to his...