Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608943C070209
Original file (9608943C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his records be corrected to show his rank as Technician 4th Grade (Tech 4).

APPLICANT STATES:  That all he did was miss roll call because he didn’t know what bus to catch; that he doesn’t think it was such a big deal; and that he earned the rank, and more.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military and medical records show:

During the period 4 April 1941-12 September 1945, he served in the Army of the United States, a total of 4 years,       5 months, and 10 days.  He was released from active duty in the grade of Tech 4 with military occupational specialty (MOS) 238 (Lineman, Telephone/Telegraph).

On 26 April 1949, he enlisted in the Enlisted Reserve Corps, as a Corporal, grade 4, MOS 3238 (Pole Lineman).

On 10 September 1950, he was ordered to active duty, as an enlisted reservist, for a period of 21 months, as a Corporal.

On 9 December 1950, while assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia, he was tried and found guilty of being drunk and disorderly, by civil authorities in Columbus, Georgia, after being confined for the period 4-8 December 1950.  His sentence is not a part of his official record.

During the period 1 March-17 June 1951, the applicant received company punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)  on 3 occasions, for being absent without leave (AWOL) on 1 March and 3 May 1951 and for being absent without a pass on 17 June 1951.  For these offenses, he received restriction on two occasions and an official reprimand, for one.


During the period 27 May-15 August 1951, he served in a unit in the Federal Republic of Germany.

On 25 July 1951, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, UCMJ, from the Commanding General, for being AWOL on 21 June 1951.  His punishment was a reduction to the rank of private first class (PFC), grade E-3.

On 28 July 1951, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, for misconduct and was reduced to the rank of private, grade E-2.

On 20 August 1951, the applicant was cleared for separation by a physical examination.  It was noted that he was instructed to report to the local health authorities because of a medical condition which had existed prior to service.

On 7 September 1951, he was honorably separated, in grade  E-2.  His Report of Separation indicates that he had       11 months and 23 days of creditable service with 5 days of lost time and total service of 5 years, 5 months and 3 days. He was entitled to award of the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany) for this period of service.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant held the rank of Tech 4 at the end of his first period of service.  The ranks held during the period in question were corporal, PFC, and private.

3.  The applicant’s rank and creditable service are correct as stated on his Report of Separation.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060574C070421

    Original file (2001060574C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case, particularly the separations documents in question, be corrected by amending the item numbers in the WD AGO 53-55 of the individual concerned, dated 7 September 1945, as indicated: Item 3 (grade) - corporal; Item 32 (battles and campaigns - Ardennes-Alsace; Central Europe; Normandy; Northern France; and Rhineland; Item 33 (awards and citations) -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004263C070205

    Original file (20060004263C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 3 (Grade) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) with a separation date of 3 February 1948, shows he was discharged from active duty in the grade of "T 5" [Tech 5th Grade]. Evidence shows during the applicant's first enlistment, he was promoted twice and held the grade of Tech 5th Grade at the time of his discharge which is correctly shown on his WD AGO Form 53. Evidence also shows at the time the applicant's discharge, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010931C070208

    Original file (20040010931C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show a field promotion to corporal and to show he is entitled to a Purple Heart for wounds received on or about 10 August 1950. Although some of the available documents list the applicant as a corporal, these records are insufficient in and of themselves to correct his records to show he was a corporal at the time of his separation. Available medical records do show he was wounded in action on 27 September 1950.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062514C070421

    Original file (2001062514C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: His DD Form 214 reflects his proper grade at the time of his discharge in June 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000668

    Original file (20080000668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge HD, or in the alternative, that his 15 September 1951 discharge for reenlistment be considered complete and unconditional; and that Item 29 (Other Service Training Courses Successfully Completed) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his military education. On 27 May 1957, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the board of officers, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003551

    Original file (20090003551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as that of S/Sgt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061054C070421

    Original file (2001061054C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The evidence of record clearly shows he was entitled to award of the GCMDL for the period 10 May 1950 to 19 July 1952, the CIB, the NDSM, the UNSM, and 2 bronze service stars to the KSM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the GCMDL for the period 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088676C070403

    Original file (2003088676C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This certificate shows the same information; the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 February 1950 and was discharged with an Bad Conduct Discharge on 10 June 1952 in the rank of Private. Army Regulation 615-364, then in effect, provided the policy for discharge of enlisted personnel pursuant only to approved sentences of a general court-martial empowered to impose a dishonorable discharge. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record, the Board found no cause for clemency and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006584

    Original file (20090006584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's reconstructed record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 29 October 1948 and was discharged on 30 May 1951 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. With respect to the applicant's rank/grade, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to the permanent rank/grade of PV2/E-2 on 20 August 1953.