APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge be revoked, that he be retained in the Army Reserves or transferred to the Retired Reserve or that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, his discharge was not warranted under applicable regulations and that the facts do not support his separation under any circumstances.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially joined the Army Reserve in 1973 and began his last term of service on 27 September 1990 when he reenlisted for 3 years. The applicant's record of service prior to the incident for which separation action was initiated is free of any disciplinary infractions.
On 23 March 1994 the applicant's unit commander initiated separation action on the applicant, under the provisions of paragraph 7-11c, AR 135-178 for commission of a serious offense. The commander cited the reason for the separation action as the applicants violation of Articles 90 and 128 of the UCMJ, in that, on 5 March 1994 he assaulted a commissioned officer with a dangerous weapon.
On 22 April 1994 the applicant completed his election of rights on which he requested that: he be provided counsel; his case be considered by a administrative separation board of officers; and that he personally appear before the administrative separation board of officers.
On 14 December 1995 an administrative separation board of officers convened to consider the applicant's case. The applicant personally appeared with counsel and presented his testimony regarding the incident for which separation action was initiated. The administrative separation board found that the allegations set forth in the notice of separation pertaining to the applicant were substantiated by the evidence presented. Additionally, the separation board recommended the applicant be discharged and his service be characterized as under other than honorable conditions.
The separation board findings and recommendations were approved by the appropriate authority and the applicant was cleared for discharge at the appropriate personnel command level based on a determination that he had over 18 but less that 20 years credible service for retired pay. Accordingly, on 23 May 1996 the applicant was discharged from the United States Army Reserve under other than honorable conditions.
Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the Army National Guard of the United States and the United States Army Reserve. Chapter 7 establishes policy and procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. The normal characterization of service for a soldier separated under the provisions of Chapter 7 is normally under other than honorable conditions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2 A properly constituted administrative separation board, at which the applicant appeared with counsel, recommended the applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation of the board and the applicant's discharge was cleared at the proper command level based on his years of credible service for retired pay. The evidence of record nor the evidence provided by the applicant is sufficient to establish that the applicant's years of credible service for retired pay exceeds that which was documented at the time of his separation.
3. All requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Even though a significant period of time elapsed between the initiation of separation action and the administrative separation board hearing, there is no evidence to suggest this prejudiced the final outcome of the case.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012200
The applicant requests an upgrade of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge from under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 26 August 1994, by memorandum sent via certified mail, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 7 of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) for misconduct commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs). On 27...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015577
On 6 June 1994, the applicant was mailed notification that action to separate him from the USAR had been initiated under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, for misconduct abuse of illegal drugs. However, there is no evidence in his official military record that shows he was diagnosed with any mental conditions while he was in the Army. The evidence of record shows he was discharged due to a positive urinalysis result for cocaine use.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005384
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserves on 8 April 2006 for a period of 8 years. On 8 July 2011, the separation authority, approved the applicants discharge IAW AR 135-178, chapter 12-1d, Abuse of Illegal Drugs, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025023
The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999025023 INDEX NUMBERS: A9218 Date of Review: 990428 A9236 Character of Service: GD A9412 Date of Discharge: 960419 A0100 Authority: AR 135-178 C7 Reason: A6730 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 3-2 A PART IX - VOTING RECORDName Reason Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005777
Applicant Name: ????? I had/ have over 13 years in the military, and all of it went up in smoke with this one, although serious, infraction. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the United States Army Reserve.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014165
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014165 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the reason and authority shown in his discharge packet and separation order from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be changed so that he may be eligible to reenlist in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011038
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the Applicants military records, during the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit a partial upgrade of the Applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicants record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110015859
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The counsel for the applicant states, in effect, that the applicants unit failed to comply with administrative regulations and procedures, and discharged the applicant without a hearing, despite a pending request for conditional waiver as documented by the attached e-mails, and that it amounts to violation of the Soldiers due process rights. The analyst noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001592
After another break in service the applicant joined the Army Reserve for a period of 6 years which is the subject of review. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Further, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013059
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he completed 20 years of qualifying service for Reserve retired pay and that he be paid compensation for the time he lost. The ADRB determined that the applicant was improperly discharged, citing that part of Army Regulation 135-178 that stated a Soldier having completed 18, but less than 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay would not be involuntarily discharged without the approval of the Commander, U. S....