2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
3. The applicants military records show that he enlisted, at age 17, on 26 May 1969 for 3 years. After completing basic and advanced training he reported to his next permanent assignment in Germany.
4. On 4 February 1970 he received nonjudicial punishment for failure to go to his place of duty. On 25 June 1970 he received another nonjudicial punishment for failure to go to his place of duty and for failure to obey a lawful order.
5. On 12 August 1970 he was convicted by a summary court-martial for AWOL from 13 to 18 July 1970.
6. On 2 October 1970 the applicant underwent a psychiatric evaluation. He was found to suffer from a character and behavior disorder.
7. On 7 October 1970 he was advised that action was being initiated to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, unsuitability. The recommendation was based on his constant rebellion, failure to conform to military life. . . and the recommendation of a psychiatrist. The applicant waived his right to a hearing before a board of officers.
8. On 9 October 1970 the commander recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the service. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed that he be issued a General Discharge Certificate.
9. Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 26 October 1970 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability due to a character and behavior disorder.
10. There is no evidence that the applicant made application to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15 year statue of limitations.
11. Army Regulation 635-200 was revised on 1 December 1976, following settlement of a civil suit. Thereafter, the type of discharge and the character of service was to be determined solely by the individual's military record during the current enlistment. Further, any separation for unsuitability, based on personality disorder must include a diagnosis of a personality disorder made by a physician trained in psychiatry. In connection with these changes, a Department of the Army Memorandum dated 14 January 1977, and better known as the Brotzman Memorandum, was promulgated. It required retroactive application of revised policies, attitudes and changes in reviewing applications for upgrade of discharges based on personality disorders. A second memorandum, dated 8 February 1978, and better known as the Nelson Memorandum, expanded the review policy and specified that the presence of a personality disorder diagnosis would justify upgrade of a discharge to fully honorable except in cases where there are "clear and demonstrable reasons" why a fully honorable discharge should not be given. Conviction by general court-martial or by more than one special court-martial was determined to be "clear and demonstrable reasons" which would justify a less than fully honorable discharge.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with regulations then in effect.
2. However, it now appears that the facts and circumstances of the applicants case meet the criteria of the above-referenced Army memorandums, and his discharge should, therefore, be upgraded to fully honorable.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service with an Honorable Discharge Certificate on 26 October 1970.
2. That the Department of the Army issue to him an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, 26 October 1970, in lieu of the general discharge of the same date now held by him.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016836
The applicant states, in effect, that he was mistreated by a sergeant while he was in Vietnam. There is no evidence which indicates the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington Special Orders Number 296, dated 23 October 1970; b. issuing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019336
On 11 May 1960, having determined that the applicant was unsuitable for further military service, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 by reason of unsuitability and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. The applicant was accordingly discharged on 26 January 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074847C070403
On 20 November 1970, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability due to character and behavior disorders. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge) on 3 December 1970 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability due to character and behavior disorders. When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013402
The applicant was placed in military confinement for 2 days. On 8 January 1971, his unit commander initiated separation proceedings under Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability - personality or behavioral disorder. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service with an Honorable Discharge Certificate on 28 January 1971; b. issuing to him an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015031
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. When separation for unsuitability was warranted, an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by a. voiding the general discharge now held...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008068
However, the available records show that on 1 May 1970 the applicants commander advised the applicant that he was recommending that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability due to a character and behavior disorder. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016968
The applicant requests, in effect, that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 17 December 1971, the company commander notified the applicant of pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability - character and behavior disorders. When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004103
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to a fully honorable discharge. On 12 February 1971, the separation authority directed the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 by reason of unsuitability with a general discharge. His service medical records are not available for review with this case and there is no indication in his military personnel records that shows he suffered from PTSD or an illness or an injury that rendered him unable to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021713
On 25 September 1970, the separation authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, by reason of unsuitability, with the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant made a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075535C070403
The applicant requests in effect, that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The psychiatrist recommended that he be administratively separated from the military under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.