Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607748C070209
Original file (9607748C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That her reentry (RE) code of RE-3 be corrected to an RE-1.

APPLICANT STATES:  That her knee problem was caused by her combat boots and she has not experienced any more problems with her knees since her discharge.  She wants to enlist in the Navy but cannot with an RE-3 code.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) on 16 July 1986 in pay grade E-1.

On 26 September 1986 she entered on her initial active duty for training.

While undergoing basic combat training, the applicant was treated for a variety of illnesses and injuries, including a stress fracture of her right knee, for which she was given physical profile limitations.  However, a several year history of generalized reaction following various stinging insect bites, including yellow jackets and hornets, which had required emergency room treatment on several occasions, required her medical fitness for further training to be evaluated by an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD).  The EPSBD found her reaction to stinging insects to be medically disqualifying under enlistment standards.

The applicant concurred with the EPSBD’s findings and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay.  

Accordingly, the applicant was honorably discharged on 13 February 1987 for not meeting procurement medical fitness standards, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11.  She was assigned a code of RE-3.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

RE-3 indicates that a person was not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  Persons separated for not meeting procurement medical fitness standards are assigned a code of RE-3.

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, provides for the involuntary separation of soldiers who do not meet procurement medical fitness standards due to conditions which did not disqualify them under retention medical fitness standards, and the unfitting conditions existed prior to their entry on active duty.  Those disqualification’s must be identified within 4 months of these soldiers entry on active duty.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  The applicant was determined medically disqualified due to a physical condition which had caused her problems well before her enlistment.  Therefore, the findings by the EPSBD are accepted.  

2.  Although the applicant was treated for a stress fracture of her knee, that condition was not found to be medically disqualifying.  As such, the applicant’s contention that her knee has healed and become stronger since her discharge is not germane to her case.

3.  In view of the preceding, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068426C070402

    Original file (2002068426C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully reviewing the application, military records and all other evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined that he had been properly and equitably discharged; accordingly, his request for a change in the character and/or reason for discharge was denied. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The evidence of record clearly indicates that it was the applicant who requested that he be separated from the US Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015586

    Original file (20080015586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides in support of his application, a copy of a letter addressed to him dated 25 March 2008, from the Director, Army Board for Correction of Military Records, notifying him of the decision made on his previous application; a copy of a Medical and Dental Appointment Receipt (DA Form 3982); Health Records-Chronological Records of Medical Care dated 5 June, 6 June, 7 June, 14 June, and 15 June 2006; a Developmental Counseling Form dated 19 June 2008; Orders 341-050 dated 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510724C070209

    Original file (9510724C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from AD, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. They are required to process a request for waiver under chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013865

    Original file (20110013865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the "discharge/medical coding" shown on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was given an honorable medical discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in October 2008. c. On 11 September 2008, Headquarters, Army Reserve Medical Command, Pinellas Park, FL, issued Orders 08-255-00035 honorably discharging her from the USAR under the authority of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005243

    Original file (20090005243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides various military and VA medical records in support of his application. The military medical records provided by the applicant show that he was treated for several medical conditions while on active duty. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), which governs the processing of Soldiers under the Disability Evaluation System (DES), chapter 3, Policies, paragraph 3–1, Standards of unfitness because of physical disability,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008441

    Original file (20130008441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029488

    Original file (20100029488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his examination physicians found no substantial evidence to support an asthma diagnosis. The EPSBD determined that the applicant did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment based on the applicant's history of asthma. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007602

    Original file (20130007602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from RE-3 to a more favorable code so she could reenter military service. Her RE code was assigned based on the fact she was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards - not erroneous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027903

    Original file (20100027903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006797C070206

    Original file (20050006797C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.