APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. He states, in effect, he was not given counseling for drug addiction and was unable to serve because of psychiatric problems and racial discrimination. He was told he would receive an honorable discharge if he accepted an administrative discharge.
Counsel offers no evidence or argument beyond that submitted with the application.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant was 18 years old when he enlisted on 19 January 1968. On his first assignment at Fort Hood, Texas he went AWOL for 13 days. His record shows he continued to perform unsatisfactorily. He received punishment under Article 15, UCMJ for AWOL and pending his third special court-martial his commander recommended he be discharged for unfitness.
Prior to the finalization of the recommended discharge the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request acknowledged that he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge he might receive. The separation authority approved the applicants request and on 19 March 1970 he was issued an undesirable discharge. The total active duty service credited to him at separation was 1 year, 7 months, and 18 days and 196 days lost time.
On 3 May 1982 the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), in a unanimous decision, denied the applicants request to upgrade his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who
has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 3 May 1982, the date of the ADRB decision. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 3 May 1985.
The application is dated 3 April 1996 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064320C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016976
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge should be upgraded for the following reasons: (1) under current standards he would not have received the type of discharge he did; (2) that his first discharge was honorable; (3) that his conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were good; (4) that he received awards and decorations; (5) that he made it all the way to staff sergeant; (6) that he has combat service;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100618C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002083109
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant's Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) Proceedings, dated 21 May 1980, shows that he received three punishments under Article 15, the Uniform Code...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709821
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607036AC070209
On 29 June 1976 the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB, in a unanimous decision, denied the applicants request to change the character of the discharge. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Boards exhaustion requirement (AR 15-185, paragraph 8), effectively...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008473
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 30 November 1971, his request was approved under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. b. Paragraph 3-7b states that a General Discharge (GD) is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066848C070402
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board and, on 2 May 1995, by unanimous decision he was denied any change in the reason or character of discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057431C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 March 1974 the Army Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705615
He received counsel and acknowledged he understood he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 1 May 1990 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which...