APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her nonselection for promotion to captain be reconsidered.
APPLICANT STATES: That she believes that certain official documents were not in her file at the time she was considered for promotion by the 1993 captain Department of the Army Reserve Component Selection Board. Specifically, she says, the file lacked documentation showing that she had completed a current physical examination, the certificate of completion of the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Basic Course and the notice of completion of Phase I of the AMEDD Officer Advanced Course. In support of her request, she provides copies of the aforementioned documents.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She was considered but not selected for promotion to captain by the 1993 Department of the Army Reserve Component Selection Board. The reasons for her nonselection was not revealed by the selection boards.
The US Total Army Personnel Command in a comment to the Board (COPY ATTACHED) indicates that all critical elements were present in the applicants file when it was considered by the 1993 promotion selection board. Critical elements are officer evaluation reports, highest level of military education, highest level of civilian education and awards of the Silver Star and above. The Chief of the Promotions and Notification Branch also notes that the applicant was selected for promotion to captain by the 1994 annual board and, therefore, recommends that the applicants request be disapproved.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:
1. The available evidence indicates that her nonselection for promotion was not based on missing documents at the time her file was reviewed by the 1993 captain selection board. In fact, she has not shown that there were any administrative deficiencies with her records that might have led to her nonselection.
2. In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607878C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, promotion reconsideration to the rank of captain in the USAR. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 15 August 1986. It opined that a review of the applicants records revealed that his records were complete when considered by the 1993 and 1994 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Boards and that the applicant has no basis for reconsideration by a promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509596C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, promotion reconsideration to the rank of captain in the USAR. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 16 May 1986. It opined that a review of the applicants records revealed that his records were complete when considered by the 1993 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board and that the applicant has no basis for reconsideration by a promotion advisory board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029760
The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to colonel by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 and 2009 year criteria. She was promoted to lieutenant colonel, effective 22 November 1998. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. ensuring that her OMPF is complete and accurate, including her officer evaluation reports for the periods ending 24 September 2006, 25 April 2007, and 25 April 2008; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706108C070209
It further opined that Army Regulation 135-155 requires commissioned officers to complete their educational requirements no later than the date a selection board convenes. A staff member of the Board contacted officials at the Office of Reserve Components Promotions to request further clarification regarding whether or not the applicant had in fact been informed that she was exempt from the requirement to complete CAS III for promotion to the rank of major. Although the Board finds that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015946
a. Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date. The Fiscal Year 2013 promotion board convened on 27 November 2012 and considered her non-educationally qualified and she was again not selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016831
The applicant states that she was not promoted to COL, O-6 during the 17 May 2004 Promotion Board. Her record indicated she was not selected for promotion to LTC by the May 2000 Promotion Board when in fact she was selected for promotion to this rank in May 1999 and was promoted on 26 September 2000. In a 4 April 2008 email to the applicant, the Board analyst requested that she forward a fax confirmation to verify the date the 2004 COL AMEDD Selection Board received her documents for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706108
A staff member of the Board contacted officials at the Office of Reserve Components Promotions to request further clarification regarding whether or not the applicant had in fact been informed that she was exempt from the requirement to complete CAS III for promotion to the rank of major. It appears, based on the information provided by the applicant which was further substantiated by officials at the PERSCOM, that the applicant was informed that she was not required to complete the CAS III...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008985
The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant states, in effect, that he recently received a memorandum from U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 16 April 2007 informing him that he was not selected for promotion to major by the Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) that convened on 8 January 2007, and that this was his second...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018817
She provided 19 DA Forms 1380: * dated 12 December 1995 shows she earned a total of 4 retirement points for 11 and 12 December 1995 * dated 17 January 1996 shows she earned a total of 2 retirement points for 16 and 17 January 1996 * dated 11 July 1997 shows she earned a total of 4 retirement points for 10 and 11 July 1997 * dated 23 October 1997 shows she earned a total of 4 retirement points for 16 and 23 October 1997 * dated 18 November 1997 shows she earned a total of 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016101
It states that each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status or on an inactive-status list and who reaches the maximum age specified in section 14509, 14510, 14511, or 14512 of this title for the officers grade or position shall (unless the officer is sooner separated or the officers separation is deferred or the officer is continued in an active status under another provision of law) not later than the last day of the month in which the...