APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records by disenrolling him from SBP (Survivor Benefit Plan).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that with the additional expenses of a new baby, he can no longer afford the SBP.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSMs military records show:
The applicant was born on 14 June 1955. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 February 1974 and through subsequent reenlistments remained on active duty until his retirement. On 31 October 1994, the applicant elected SBP participation for his spouse and child based on a reduced amount of $300. He acknowledged that the election once made was irrevocable. His spouse concurred with his election. On 31 December 1994, the applicant retired, after serving more than
20 years of creditable active service. The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-7.
Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The election made by the member was irrevocable.
In those cases where the member elected not to participate in the SBP, to participate at less than the maximum coverage, or to exclude the spouse by designating children only as beneficiaries, it was required that the spouse was to be made aware of the member's decision and of the implications of that decision as it affected the spouse's future welfare.
In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from SBP Board which recommended, that the applicants request be denied.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
1. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP for his spouse and child at the minimum amount, and at the time acknowledged that his election was irrevocable.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence which would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
3. In view of the foregoing, there exists no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024346
The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate on 18 August 1994 electing immediate coverage under option C for children-only coverage upon receipt of his 20-year letter. At that time, his election would have been sent to HRC because DFAS had not yet established a retired pay account as he was still under the age of 60. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 30 August 1996.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511501C070209
On 8 July 1994, the applicant elected SBP participation for spouse and child coverage. The evidence of record shows that after her retirement, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP for spouse and child. If the applicant had not made an election automatic coverage would have gone into effect for her spouse.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008071
On 15 January 1996, the applicant submitted a request to DFAS, based on a proceeding of divorce and ratified by a court order signed and dated 17 October 1995, to be deemed the former spouse of the FSM for the purpose of survivor benefit coverage under the SBP. d. upon information and belief the SBP benefits have not been continued and the applicant had been unable to obtain military records to confirm the same; and e. the applicant requested the Court issue an order requiring release of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019757
The applicant elected spouse and child (i.e. spouse only) coverage based on less than his full retirement pay. If she non-concurred with the applicant's election, the applicant would receive automatic spouse SBP full coverage. An election to decline to participate in the SBP or elect SBP in a reduced amount, must be made and have the spouse's concurrence made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019212
The applicant states: * Army regulations in effect at the time the FSM submitted his retired pay application required the submission of a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) * After an exhaustive search with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised her that they could not find this document * She was never counseled or provided any documentation to sign for or notarize to relinquish of the SBP * She was married to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511044C070209
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: 1. The evidence of record shows that on 29 March 1979, the applicant elected SBP for spouse and dependent children (copy attached). The applicants allegation that he does not remember electing SBP participation does not provide a basis for granting the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020165
Had he been eligible for spouse election, his spouse would have had to consent to his election at the time. The evidence of record shows that upon retirement in 1987, he executed an SBP Election Certificate, electing children only SBP coverage based on the full amount. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he made a timely request to cover his post-retirement spouse under the SBP within 1 year of...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-079
The applicant stated that his son receives monthly Social Security Supplemental Income (SSI) benefits as well as Medicaid assistance to pay for group home care, day support, transportation, case management, medication, and psychiatric service, all of which amounts to a yearly benefit of approximately $105,333.21. CGPPC stated that the applicant did not elect out of SBP and instead elected child and spouse coverage, and that there is no evidence in the record that either the applicant or his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010237
BOARD DATE: 8 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010237 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When the error was discovered, his son was added to the SBP account and an adjustment was made from "declined" to "child" coverage, effective 1 July 2011. The law stipulates that a member who does not have a dependent child at the time of initial eligibility for SBP may elect coverage for a dependent child within the one-year period after acquiring the first dependent child.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074187C070403
The applicant’s 20-year letter was dated 6 August 1979 and his first DD Form 1883, in which he elected children only RCSBP coverage, was dated 19 May 1980. On 1 December 1980, within one year of his marriage, he elected to provide RCSBP coverage for his new spouse (and children) as by law he had the right to. At that time, his spouse costs were reinstated based upon his full retired pay (as provided by his original election of coverage and as he requested on the DD Form 1882).