APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Meritorious Service Medal.
APPLICANT STATES: He was originally recommended for award of the Meritorious Service Medal but an injustice occurred when the award was downgraded to an Army Commendation Medal. He cites several achievements during his military career which he believes justifies award of the Meritorious Service Medal, including serving as the public affair office representative during a deployment to Cuba, arranging media coverage for visiting dignitaries at Fort Drum, New York, coordination of a ceremony in Czechoslovakia, and production of a history of the 1st Infantry Division in Germany.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He served an initial period of active duty between 1976 and 1983 prior to reenlisting on 21 July 1988. During his initial term of service he was trained and performed duties as a journalist. Upon reenlisting he was trained as an infantryman but again primarily performed duties as a journalist.
While performing duties as a photo journalist during his assignment with the 1st Infantry Division in Germany he was awarded four Army Achievement Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. Two of the Army Achievement Medals were awarded on 1 October 1990; one for his contributions to the public affairs office which resulted in positive comments about the organizations newspaper by Department of the Army and the second for his involvement with the Czechoslovakian ceremony. In July 1991 he was recognized for his history of the 1st Infantry Division. He received an Army Achievement Medal and an Army Commendation Medal as a result of his deployment to Southwest Asia. While both were for essentially the same events and the same period one was awarded for achievement while the other was awarded for service.
The applicant was recommended for award of the Meritorious Service Medal for the period 21 July 1988 through 20 July 1992 by the NCO in charge of the Fort Drum, Public Affairs Office. The proposed recommendation noted the applicant had served exceptionally as a journalist and significantly contributed to meeting command and public information mission requirements. The divisions public affairs officer supported the recommendation but the commander, 10th Division Support Command downgraded the award to an Army Commendation Medal. The approving authority noted that while the applicant did a super job and [was] deserving of a medal...[he did] not feel that the responsibilities of his position and actions [were] commensurate with the award of a MSM.
On 20 July 1992 the applicant was released from active duty in pay grade E-4 having reached his retention control point.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that on individual is automatically entitled to an award and the decision to award an individual a decoration and the decision as to which award is appropriate are both subjective decisions made by the commander having award approval authority. The Army does not condone self-recognition; therefore, a soldier may not recommend himself/herself for award of a decoration.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. While his service and achievements as a journalist were certainly noteworthy they were more than adequately recognized by the seven awards he received during his four year enlistment contract.
3. The applicants Meritorious Service Medal recommendation was processed to conclusion with no evidence of error or injustice. The Army Commendation Medal awarded upon his separation in 1992 was appropriate and there is no reason for the Board to question the subjective decision of the awards approval authority.
4. The applicant's belief that he should have received the Meritorious Service Medal is not a basis for awarding the decoration and is tantamount to recommending himself for an award.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for
granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008417
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the ending period 23 May 1995 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device, the Army Achievement Medal 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster, and item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 to show the additional skill identifier (ASI) 11M20J300. There are no orders in his military records that show he was awarded an ASI after completion of the course. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016584
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of the Infantry School and Air Assault School * award of the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal * his service during Operation Desert Storm and all corresponding medals 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years, 8 months, and 7 days of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057959C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service during the Gulf War. COUNSEL CONTENDS : Based on the merits of this case, it is requested that corrective action be taken and grant the former service member the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003340
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests removal of Part V (Performance and Potential Evaluation (Rater)) and Part VII (Senior Rater) of his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the rating period 28 July 2006 through "2" (i.e., 27) July 2007. The evidence of record shows the applicant received a referred OER that stated his performance was mediocre, inconsistent, did not meet minimal acceptable standards, and he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000559
On 22 September 2004, the applicant's company commander (CO) submitted a DA Form 638 to the battalion commander recommending the applicant for award of the Army Commendation Medal with V Device for his actions on 18 September 2004. Army Regulation 600-8-22, table 3-2 (Steps for preparing and processing awards using the DA Form 638) states, in part: a. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows the appropriate approving authority did...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013371
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award). The applicant states: a. all of his awards were not listed on his DD Form 214; and b. his commander was going to initiate a request for the Meritorious Service Medal after Desert Storm. An undated DA Form 638-1 shows the applicant's commander recommended him for the MSM for meritorious service during the period 17 December 1988 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021857
The Soldier must retire on the approved retirement date. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Second, the approval authority for Soldiers who request retirement in lieu of PCS is the Commander, HRC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019897
His DD Form 214 lists his authorized awards as the: * Army Service Ribbon * National Defense Service Medal * Army Lapel Button * Army Good Conduct Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Overseas Service Ribbon with Numeral 1 * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) 6. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows two awards while the evidence of record shows he was awarded three Army Achievement Medals. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004510
The applicant requests, in effect, that an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) Certificate, dated 20 July 2012, and Permanent Orders (PO) 277-10, dated 3 October 2012, be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). His AMHRR contains the contested ARCOM Certificate, which shows he received the award for the period 19 August 2009 through 27 July 2012 while he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017283
The applicant states his award of the ARCOM should be recorded as the ARCOM with V Device based on the supporting statement from the brigade commander who "downgraded" it. On 22 September 2004, the applicant's company commander (CO) submitted a DA Form 638 to the battalion commander recommending the applicant for award of the ARCOM with V Device for his actions on 18 September 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...