Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605799C070209
Original file (9605799C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of the military records of her late ex-husband, the former service member (FSM) to show that he changed his SBP (Survivor Benefit Plan) election from spouse and children to former spouse subsequent to his divorce.  She also states in effect, that, on 14 April 1994, her divorce decree mandated maintenance in the SBP for the former spouse.

3.  The applicant's military records show that FSM retired from active duty on 1 September 1975.  He elected SBP participation for his spouse and children.  The applicant was divorced on 14 April 1994.  A court order and the final divorce decree mandated maintenance in the SBP for his former spouse.  However, the FSM took action into his own hands, contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service Cleveland (DFAS-CL), suspended spouse coverage and decline conversion from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage.  On 5 July 1994, the applicant received her division of retirement pay.  On 20 July 1994, the FSM was shot and died. On 2 August 1994, the applicant received a second check, but she returned the check due to the death of the FSM.

4.  In October 1994, the applicant contacted DFAS-CL, via telephone concerning SBP.  The applicant was told to contact the legal department, which she did.  Thereafter, on many other occasions that followed her initial contact with DFAS, she was told that additional documentation was needed before a determination of her eligibility could be made.  The applicant submitted requested copies via certified mail.  (The applicant provided records of her mailings made to DFAS with return receipts signed and dated).

5.  In March 1995, near the end of the one year period, the applicant was told by DFAS that all the paperwork that she had submitted was lost and that she would need to resubmit her paperwork.  The applicant again resubmitted the requested copies via certified mail.  

6.  The applicant called DFAS-CL in April and in June 1995, in regard to her case, and it was during this time frame that the applicant was informed by DFAS that she had 1 year from the date of her divorce to file for SBP coverage.  When the applicant’s file was finally located more than one year had passed and her application was denied, but she was advised to apply to this Board.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

8.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement.  The law stipulated that the retiree had to request the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to change the SBP participation from spouse to former spouse.  This request had to made within 1 year from the date of the divorce.  The applicant decree stipulated that his spouse would be maintained in the SBP as a former spouse.

9.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the SBP Board which recommended the applicant’s SBP election be changed from spouse and child to former spouse, based on full retired pay, retroactive to date of divorce.  Further, that an annuity should be paid to former spouse (the applicant), retroactive to the FSM’s date of death on 20 July 1994.     

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was divorced on 14 April 1994.  The divorce decree stipulated maintenance in the SBP for the former spouse.  The FSM without consent suspended spouse coverage and did not convert spouse coverage to former spouse coverage.  

2.  The evidence of record also shows that on many occasions the applicant resubmitted requested documents via certified mail.  However, she was always told that additional documentation was needed before a determination of her eligibility could be made.  Finally in March 1995, DFAS lost her entire case and because of administrative error on the part of DFAS, the applicant was denied the annuity.  

3.  There appears to be no evidence of negligence on the part of the applicant.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing findings, conclusions and the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct the records as recommended below.  

RECOMMENDATION:  

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant is enrolled in SBP for former spouse based on the full retired pay, retroactive to date of divorce, with an annuity retroactive to date of FSM’s death, on 20 July 1994.  

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011742

    Original file (20130011742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), as follows: * by showing he timely elected to change his election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage on 19 November 1994 * by showing the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) timely processed this change in election * by paying her an SBP annuity as the former spouse retroactive to the date of the FSM's death on 6 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014270

    Original file (20140014270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to former spouse coverage and that she be provided an SBP annuity accordingly. Although it is unknown if the court ordered the FSM to make a former spouse SBP election, he paid the SBP/RCSBP premiums through the date of his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000590

    Original file (20140000590.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * FSM and applicant's marriage certificate * FSM and applicant's divorce decree * FSM's death certificate * FSM's Retiree Account Statement, dated 6 May 1996 * FSM's Retiree Account Statement, dated 25 March 2002 * letter from the FSM to the Army Finance and Accounting Center (currently known as the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)), dated 30 June 1994 * letter to the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030020

    Original file (20100030020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011434

    Original file (20110011434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, a former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests change of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage and payment of the SBP annuity. His service record is void of evidence that indicates the FSM made a voluntary election or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. e. On 17 July 2009, the applicant contacted DFAS again in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028877

    Original file (20100028877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence that shows he changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce, and there is no indication the applicant requested the SBP coverage be deemed to her as a former spouse. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002143

    Original file (20090002143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant married the FSM in "1995," but he did not inform DFAS within a year of the marriage, so the applicant was not eligible. DFAS issued the applicant two payments which were later collected because she was not entitled to an SBP annuity because the FSM was not married at the time of his retirement and had not elected coverage for her within one year of their marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003015

    Original file (20120003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 15 July 2002 letter, the applicant's attorney indicated she mailed documents (e.g., certified copy of the final decree of divorce, letter from the applicant, and agreement to name the applicant former spouse beneficiary under the SBP) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Denver, CO, with a return receipt request (7109 2817 3080 0000 0491). f. the necessary documentation was sent to DFAS in a timely manner along with the agreement between the spouses and a certified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003158

    Original file (20150003158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. Her former spouse's SBP election was then changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage. On 16 December 2014, by letter, DFAS informed the applicant that after a review of the FSM's pay records, it was determined that the wording in the divorce decree was insufficient to establish that the court...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007864

    Original file (20090007864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 17 May 2002. However, premiums were still being deducted from the FSM’s retired pay for "spouse only" coverage beyond the date of his death on 5 January 2009 through 13 April 2009, when it was terminated upon notification of his divorce and death through the applicant's request for SBP benefits. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the FSM voluntarily changed...