Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605651C070209
Original file (9605651C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected.  He states in effect, that his date of entry on his DD Form 214 and his total active service are incorrect on his DD Form 214.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 18 January 1952.  He completed 11 years of formal education.  On 6 May 1971, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  His Armed Forces Qualifications Test score was 48 (Category III).  The applicant’s record indicates that he only completed combat basic training.

On 3 August 1971, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for failure to repair.  His imposed punishment was a forfeiture of $20 pay, 7 days restriction, and extra duty.

Between 20 November 1971 and 4 April 1972, the applicant was counseled on five different occasions for his appearance and his poor duty performance.

On 4 May 1972, the commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge under the Qualitative Management Program, in accordance with DA Message 242110Z September 1971.  The commander’s recommendation was based on the applicant’s unkempt appearance, his unsatisfactory duty performance and his failure to respond to counseling. 

On 6 June 1972, a medical examination found the applicant fit for retention.

On 15 June 1972, the applicant was honorably discharged in accordance with DA Message 242110Z, September 1971, (Failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotional advancement).  His DD Form 214 indicated that he had completed 8 months and 14 days of creditable active service and 25 days of lost time. 

On 9 October 1974, the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty).  The applicant’s net service was corrected to show that he had served 1 year and 15 days of creditable active service instead of 8 months and 14 days of active service.  The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File indicates, that the date of entry recorded on his DD Form 214 is correct.

There is no evidence in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File in support of his allegations. 

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 
15 June 1972, the date the applicant was discharged.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 15 June 1975.

The application is dated 14 July 1994, and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013820

    Original file (20140013820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The recommendation for separation was submitted on 24 September 1973 and the appropriate authority approved the recommendation on 6 November 1973 under the provisions of Department of the Army message date time group (DTG) 242110Z September 1971, Subject: Extension of QMP to grades E-1 and E-2, due to failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotion advancement and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. He was properly issued a SPN of 21U to indicate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102487C070208

    Original file (2004102487C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 8 July 1971. On 23 June 1972, the unit commander formally counseled the applicant regarding his candidacy for separation under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP) due to his erratic performance of duty and admitted use of hard drugs. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007751

    Original file (20090007751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows that the applicant was AWOL for the period 1 February 1972 through 2 March 1972. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012332

    Original file (20090012332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In an undated statement apparently given to him when his commander notified him he was recommending his separation, the applicant acknowledged that his platoon sergeant, first sergeant, and battery commander had counseled him repeatedly for his failure to demonstrate the standards of acceptable conduct for members of the U.S. Army. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant's discharge processing was accomplished in accordance with the Army policy in effect at the time. Therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023140

    Original file (20100023140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant was arrested for larceny from an automobile and confined by civil authorities from 8 September 1971 to 1 October 1971, he was AWOL from 26 October 1971 to 10 January 1972 and from 8 March to 28 May 1972, he accepted NJP twice, and he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011571

    Original file (20100011571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following: * An upgrade of his character of service from under honorable conditions to honorable * Award of the Purple Heart, Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and all other awards that he may be entitled due to his Vietnam service 2. He states, in effect, his 201 file (Military Personnel Records Jacket) should show he received the Army Commendation Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014147

    Original file (20100014147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to honorable. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017791

    Original file (20100017791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1, on 8 December 1971, for 3 years. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008499

    Original file (20090008499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under honorable conditions (general) discharge to fully honorable. On 26 November 1971, by endorsement, the applicant's immediate commander was notified that the applicant's discharge was approved under the provisions of DA Message 242110Z Sep 71 with the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate by reason of failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotion advancement. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017396

    Original file (20110017396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017396 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.